Article Data

  • Views 563
  • Dowloads 110

Original Research

Open Access

The Effectiveness of Physiotherapy in the Management of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Maria Paço1
  • Bárbara Peleteiro2
  • José Duarte3
  • Teresa Pinho1,4,*,

1CESPU, Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada em Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde, Gandra PRD, Portugal

2EPI Unit, Institute of Public Health, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Predictive Medicine and Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

3CIAFEL, The Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

4IBMC, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1661 Vol.30,Issue 3,September 2016 pp.210-220

Published: 30 September 2016

*Corresponding Author(s): Teresa Pinho E-mail: teresa.pinho@iscsn.cespu.pt

Abstract

Aims: To analyze the methodologic quality, summarize the findings, and perform a meta-analysis of the results from randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of physiotherapy management of temporomandibular disorders. Methods: A literature review was performed using the electronic databases PubMed, Science Direct, and EBSCO. Each article was independently assessed by two investigators using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Jadad scales, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A meta-analysis was conducted by using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects method to obtain summary estimates of the standardized mean differences (SMD) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Between-study heterogeneity was computed and publication bias was assessed. Results: Seven articles met the inclusion criteria and were used in the analysis, corresponding to nine estimates of SMD. The meta-analysis showed that for pain reduction, the summary SMD favored physiotherapy (SMD = −0.63; 95% CI: −0.95 to −0.31; number of studies = 8; I2 = 0.0%), while for active range of movement (ROM) the differences between the intervention and control groups were not statistically significant (SMD = 0.33; 95% CI: −0.07 to 0.72; number of studies = 9; I2 = 61.9%). Conclusion: Physiotherapy seems to lead to decreased pain and may improve active ROM. However, the results are not definitive and further studies and meta-analyses are needed before these results can be considered fully generalizable.

Keywords

mandibular function; pain; RCT

Cite and Share

Maria Paço,Bárbara Peleteiro,José Duarte,Teresa Pinho. The Effectiveness of Physiotherapy in the Management of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2016. 30(3);210-220.

References

1. McNeill C. History and evolution of TMD concepts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:51–60.

2. Okeson JP. Orofacial Pain: Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis and Management. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996.

3. Greenberg MS, Glick M, Ship JA (eds). Burket's Oral Medicine, ed 11. Hamilton, Ontario: BC Decker, 2008.

4. Oral K, Bal Küçük B, Ebeog˘lu B, Dinçer S. Etiology of temporomandibular disorder pain. Ag˘rı 2009;21:89–94.

5. Gremillion HA. The prevalence and etiology of temporomandibular disorders and orofacial pain. Tex Dent J 2000;117:30–39.

6. LeResche L. Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: Implications for the investigation of etiologic factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:291–305.

7. Suvinen TI, Reade PC, Kemppainen P, Könönen M, Dworkin SF. Review of aetiological concepts of temporomandibular paindisorders: Towards a biopsychosocial model for integration of physical disorder factors with psychological and psychosocial illness impact factors. Eur J Pain 2005;9:613–633.

8. Poveda Roda R, Bagan JV, Díaz Fernández JM, Hernández Bazán S, Jiménez Soriano Y. Review of temporomandibular joint pathology. Part I: Classification, epidemiology and risk factors. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007;12:E292–E298.

9. Ingawalé S, Goswami T. Temporomandibular joint: Disorders, treatments, and biomechanics. Ann Biomed Eng 2009;37: 976–996.

10. Kalamir A, Pollard H, Vitiello AL, Bonello R. Manual therapy for temporomandibular disorders: A review of the literature. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2007;11:84–90.

11. List T, Axelsson S. Management of TMD: Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37: 430–451.

12. Scrivani SJ, Keith Da, Kaban LB. Temporomandibular disorders. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2693–2705.

13. Yuasa H, Kino K, Kubota E, et al. Primary treatment of temporomandibular disorders: The Japanese Society for the temporomandibular joint evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, ed 2. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2013;49:89–98.

14. McNeely ML, Olivo SA, Magee DJ. A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical therapy interventions for temporomandibular disorders. Phys Ther 2006;86:710–725.

15. Medlicott MS, Harris SR. A systematic review of the effectiveness of exercise, manual therapy, electrotherapy, relaxation training, and biofeedback in the management of temporomandibular disorder. Phys Ther 2006;86:955–973.

16. Craane B, Dijkstra PU, Stappaerts K, De Laat A. One-year evaluation of the effect of physical therapy for masticatory muscle pain: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain 2012;16:737–747.

17. Kalamir A, Bonello R, Graham P, Vitiello AL, Pollard H. Intraoral myofascial therapy for chronic myogenous temporomandibular disorder: A randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2012;35:26–37.

18. Mulet M, Decker KL, Look JO, Lenton PA, Schiffman EL. A randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy of adding 6 x 6 exercises to self-care for the treatment of masticatory myofascial pain. J Orofac Pain 2007;21:318–328.

19. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, ed 5. http://handbook.cochrane.org . Accessed 19 July 2016.

20. de Morton NA. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: A demographic study. Aust J Physiother 2009;55:129–133.

21. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1–12.

22. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005;5:13.

23. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–188.

24. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539–1558.

25. Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: Power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:1119–1129.

26. Carmeli E, Sheklow SL, Bloomenfeld I. Comparative study of repositioning splint therapy and passive manual range of motion techniques for anterior displaced temporomandibular discs with unstable excursive reduction. Physiotherapy 2001;87:26–36.

27. Craane B, Dijkstra PU, Stappaerts K, De Laat A. Randomized controlled trial on physical therapy for TMJ closed lock. J Dent Res 2012;91:364–369.

28. Fernández-Carnero J, La Touche R, Ortega-Santiago R, et al. Short-term effects of dry needling of active myofascial trigger points in the masseter muscle in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2010;24:106–112.

29. Kalamir A, Graham PL, Vitiello AL, Bonello R, Pollard H. Intraoral myofascial therapy versus education and self-care in the treatment of chronic, myogenous temporomandibular disorder: A randomised, clinical trial. Chiropr Man Therap 2013;21:17.

30. Tuncer AB, Ergun N, Tuncer AH, Karahan S. Effectiveness of manual therapy and home physical therapy in patients with temporomandibular disorders: A randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2013;17:302–308.

31. De Laat A, Stappaerts K, Papy S. Counseling and physical therapy as treatment for myofascial pain of the masticatory system. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:42–49.

32. Michelotti A, Steenks MH, Farella M, Parisini F, Cimino R, Martina R. The additional value of a home physical therapy regimen versus patient education only for the treatment of myofascial pain of the jaw muscles: Short-term results of a randomized clinical trial. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:114–125.

33. de Leeuw R, Klasser GD. Orofacial Pain: Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management, ed 5. Chicago: Quintessence, 2013.

34. van Grootel RJ, van der Glas HW. Statistically and clinically important change of pain scores in patients with myogenous temporomandibular disorders. Eur J Pain 2009;13:506–510.

35. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001;94: 149–158.

36. Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, Price DD, Robinson ME, George SZ. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: A comprehensive model. Man Ther 2009;14:531–538.

37. Schmid A, Brunner F, Wright A, Bachmann LM. Paradigm shift in manual therapy? Evidence for a central nervous system component in the response to passive cervical joint mobilisation. Man Ther 2008;13:387–396.

38. Schmid AB, Nee RJ, Coppieters MW. Reappraising entrapment neuropathies--mechanisms, diagnosis and management. Man Ther 2013;18:449–457.

39. Backonja MM, Attal N, Baron R, et al. Value of quantitative sensory testing in neurological and pain disorders: NeuPSIG consensus. Pain 2013;154:1807–1819.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top