Article Data

  • Views 320
  • Dowloads 37

Original Research

Open Access

A New Equation for Predicting Evolution of Oral Pain in Orthodontic Treatment: A Longitudinal, Prospective Cohort Study

  • Monica Larrea1
  • Rosario Salvador2
  • Rosa Cibrian2
  • Jose Luis Gandia1
  • Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo1,*,

1Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

2Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

3Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

4,

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1723 Vol.31,Issue 2,June 2017 pp.172-179

Published: 30 June 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo E-mail: Vanessa.paredes@uv.es

Abstract

Aims: To develop an equation capable of relating the evolution of oral pain to the time elapsed, measured from the moment of dental archwire fitting and identifying when pain begins, peaks, and ends; and secondly, to compare pain during orthodontic treatment in relation to archwire material (steel or nickel-titanium [Ni-Ti]) and position (maxillary or mandibular) and patient age (child, teenager, or adult) and gender (male or female). Methods: A longitudinal prospective cohort study was conducted of 112 patients who filled in a scale to evaluate pain, noting the times when the pain occurred. The total sample consisted of 60 males and 52 females with a mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age of 19.8 ± 6.2 years. The sample was divided into five groups depending on archwire material and position, and patient age and gender. A univariate four-way ANOVA model was performed to compare mean pain levels between groups. Bonferroni test was used for multiple comparisons. A univariate non-linear regression model was carried out for pain level, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated, and the statistic R2 was used. Results: An equation was developed based on pain levels in relation to time elapsed, measured from the moment when the archwire had been fitted in the mouth. The equation had three coefficients related to mean pain values: overall pain, peak pain, and how pain decreased. It fitted all study groups with a correlation coefficient > 0.9. The model showed that pain levels were influenced by archwire material and patient gender and age, but not archwire position. Conclusion: The equation reproduced the data registered and can be applied to studies of pain derived from archwires, and this methodology could be used for other external agents fitted in the mouth. Patients receiving dental treatment involving external agents can be made aware of the pain they can expect to experience. This will enable them to distinguish expected pain from other pain, which will help them identify other pathologies requiring medical attention and to approach treatment with better motivation since the pattern of pain evolution is known in advance.

Keywords

archwire; dental treatment; evolution of pain; mathematical equation; visual analog scale


Cite and Share

Monica Larrea,Rosario Salvador,Rosa Cibrian,Jose Luis Gandia,Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo. A New Equation for Predicting Evolution of Oral Pain in Orthodontic Treatment: A Longitudinal, Prospective Cohort Study. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2017. 31(2);172-179.

References

1. Krishnan V. Orthodontic pain: From causes to management—A review. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:170–179.

2.

Barbieri G, Solano P, Alarcón JA, et al. Biochemical markers of bone metabolism in gingival crevicular fluid during early orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod 2013;83:63–69.

3. Oliver RG, Knapman YM. Attitudes to orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1985;12:179–188.

4.

Kvam E, Gjerdet NR, Bondevik O. Traumatic ulcers and pain during orthodontic treatment. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1987;15:104–107.

5. Scheurer PA, Firestone AR, Bürgin WB. Perception of pain as a result of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:349–357.

6. Barros Vde M, Seraidarian PI, Côrtes MI, de Paula LV. The impact of orofacial pain on the quality of life of patients with temporomandibular disorder. J Orofac Pain 2009;23:28–37.

7. Jones ML. An investigation into the initial discomfort caused by placement of an archwire. Eur J Orthod 1984;6:48–54.

8.

Williams JM, Murray JJ, Lund CA, Harkiss B, de Franco A. Anxiety in the child dental clinic. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1985;26:305–310.

9. Ngan P, Kess B, Wilson S. Perception of discomfort by patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:47–53.

10. Jones M, Chan C. The pain and discomfort experienced during orthodontic treatment: A randomized controlled clinical trial of two initial aligning arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:373–381.

11. Ngan P, Wilson S, Shanfeld J, Amini H. The effect of ibuprofen on the level of discomfort in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:88–95.

12. Fernandes LM, Ogaard B, Skoglund L. Pain and discomfort experienced after placement of a conventional or a superelasticNiTi aligning archwire. A randomized clinical trial.J Orofac Orthop 1998;59:331–339.

13. Firestone AR, Scheurer PA, Bürgin WB. Patients’ anticipation of pain and pain-related side effects, and their perception of pain as a result of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:387–396.

14. Erdinç AME Dinçer B. Perception of pain during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:79–85.

15. Polat O, Karaman AI. Pain control during fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Angle Orthod 2005;75:214–219.

16. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics, ed 5. St Louis: Elsevier/Mosby, 2012.

17. Fuck LM, Drescher D. Force systems in the initial phase of orthodontic treatment—A comparison of different leveling arch wires. J Orofac Orthop 2006;67:6–18.

18. Jian F, Lai W, Furness S, et al. Initial arch wires for tooth alignment during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(4):CD007859.

19. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 2014; 12:1495–1499.

20. Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain 2011;152:2399–2404.

21. Cameron AC, Windmeijer FAG. An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models. J Econom 1997;77:329–342.

22. Jones ML, Richmond S. Initial tooth movement: Force application and pain—A relationship? Am J Orthod 1985;88:111–116.

23. Bergius M, Kiliaridis S, Berggren U. Pain in orthodontics: A review and discussion of the literature. J Orofac Orthop 2000; 61:125–137.

24. Bergius M, Berggren U, Kiliaridis S. Experience of pain during an orthodontic procedure. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:92–98.

25. Giannopoulou C, Dudic A, Kiliaridis S. Pain discomfort and crevicular fluid changes induced by orthodontic elastic separators in children. J Pain 2006;7:367–376.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top