Thermal Perception as a Key Factor for Assessing Effects of Trigeminal Nerve Injury

Aims: To conduct a functional examination using multimodal exploration of a sample of patients with iatrogenic trigeminal nerve injury to understand the underlying mechanisms of neuropathic pain following trigeminal nerve injury. Methods: Subjective and objective symptoms and responses to thermal and electrical quantitative sensory testing (QST) were evaluated in 85 patients with unilateral trigeminal nerve injury. Objective symptoms were measured by seven clinical sensory tests. Thermal QST included cold detection threshold (CDT), warm detection threshold (WDT), and heat pain threshold (HPT). Electrical current perception threshold was performed with electrical stimuli of 2,000, 250, and 5 Hz. The time since injury was included as a possible independent variable. The data were analyzed using chi-square test, independent t test, Mann Whitney U test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Kruskal-Wallis test. Further analyses with Pearson correlation analysis, Spearman rank correlation analysis, and cluster analysis were applied. Results: Unlike objective symptoms, thermal and electrical QST values and subjective symptoms did not improve in patients with an old injury. Thermal QST, particularly WDT, showed the highest positive correlation with subjective symptoms in all tests. Cluster analysis of the thermal QST values identified three subgroups: cluster 1, which was characterized by prominent cold and warm hypoesthesia; cluster 2, which presented elevated WDT; and cluster 3, which showed the smallest thermal differences for all thermal variables but had the highest proportion of neuropathic pain. Conclusion: These findings have demonstrated that thermal QST is a suitable tool for evaluating and characterizing the sensory effects of trigeminal nerve injury. Three subgroups with different thermosensory profiles showed that the less the damage, the more neuropathic pain occurs. The loss of warm perception in particular might play a pivotal role in the chronicity and severity of subjective sensory symptoms.

prognosis; thermal; trigeminal nerve injury; quantitative sensory testing; warm

1. Renton T, Yilmaz Z. Profiling of patients presenting with posttraumatic neuropathy of the trigeminal nerve. J Orofac Pain 2011; 25:333–344.

2. Libersa P, Savignat M, Tonnel A. Neurosensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve: A retrospective study of complaints in a 10-year period. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:1486–1489.

3. Deppe H, Mücke T, Wagenpfeil S, Kesting M, Linsenmeyer E, Tölle T. Trigeminal nerve injuries after mandibular oral surgeryin a university outpatient setting--a retrospective analysis of 1,559 cases. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:149–157.

4. Benoliel R, Eliav E. Neuropathic orofacial pain. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2008;20:237–254.

5. Phillips C, Essick G. Inferior alveolar nerve injury following orthognathic surgery: A review of assessment issues. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:547–554.

6. Robinson PP. Observations on the recovery of sensation following inferior alveolar nerve injuries. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;26:177–189.

7. Zuniga JR, Essick GK. A contemporary approach to the clinical evaluation of trigeminal nerve injuries. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1992;4:353–367.

8. Jääskeläinen SK. Clinical neurophysiology and quantitative sensory testing in the investigation of orofacial pain and sensory function. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:85–107.

9. Jääskeläinen SK. The utility of clinical neurophysiological and quantitative sensory testing for trigeminal neuropathy. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:355–359.

10. Essick GK. Psychophysical assessment of patients with posttraumatic neuropathic trigeminal pain. J Orofac Pain 2004; 18:345–354.

11. Eliav E, Gracely RH, Nahlieli O, Benoliel R. Quantitative sensory testing in trigeminal nerve damage assessment. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:339–344.

12. Jääskeläinen SK, Teerijoki-Oksa T, Forssell H. Neurophysiologic and quantitative sensory testing in the diagnosis of trigeminal neuropathy and neuropathic pain. Pain 2005;117:349–357.

13. Caissie R, Landry PE, Paquin R, Champigny MF, Berthod F. Quantitative method to evaluate the functionality of the trigeminal nerve. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:2254–2259.

14. Rolke R, Baron R, Maier C, et al. Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Standardized protocol and reference values. Pain 2006;123: 231–243.

15. Chong PS, Cros DP. Technology literature review: Quantitative sensory testing. Muscle Nerve 2004;29:734–747.

16. Maier C, Baron R, Tölle TR, et al. Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Somatosensory abnormalities in 1236 patients with different neuropathic pain syndromes. Pain 2010;150:439–450.

17. Svensson P, Baad-Hansen L, Pigg M, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for assessment of somatosensory function in orofacial pain conditions—a taskforce report. J Oral Rehabil 2011; 38:366–394.

18. Gottrup H, Nielsen J, Arendt-Nielsen L, Jensen TS. The relationship between sensory thresholds and mechanical hyperalgesia in nerve injury. Pain 1998;75:321–329.

19. Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jääskeläinen S, Forssell K, Virtanen A, Forssell H. An evaluation of clinical and electrophysiologic tests in nerve injury diagnosis after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;32:15–23.

20. Robinson PP, Boissonade FM, Loescher AR, et al. Peripheral mechanisms for the initiation of pain following trigeminal nerve injury. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:287–292.

21. Leffler AS, Hansson P. Painful traumatic peripheral partial nerve injury-sensory dysfunction profiles comparing outcomes of bedside examination and quantitative sensory testing. Eur J Pain 2008;12:397–402.

22.

Kim HK, Kim KS, Kim ME. Influence of test site and baseline temperature on orofacial thermal thresholds. J Orofac Pain 2013;27:263–270.

23. Zuniga JR, Meyer RA, Gregg JM, Miloro M, Davis LF. The accuracy of clinical neurosensory testing for nerve injury diagnosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56:2–8.

24. Aasvang EK, Brandsborg B, Christensen B, Jensen TS, Kehlet

H. Neurophysiological characterization of postherniotomy pain. Pain 2008;137:173–181.

25. Dualé C, Guastella V, Morand D, et al. Characteristics of the neuropathy induced by thoracotomy: A 4-month follow-up study with psychophysical examination. Clin J Pain 2011;27:471–480.

26. Vilholm OJ, Cold S, Rasmussen L, Sindrup SH. Sensory function and pain in a population of patients treated for breast cancer. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009;53:800–806.

27. Gottrup H, Andersen J, Arendt-Nielsen L, Jensen TS. Psychophysical examination in patients with post-mastectomy pain. Pain 2000;87:275–284.

28. Van Boven RW, Johnson KO. A psychophysical study of the mechanisms of sensory recovery following nerve injury in humans. Brain 1994;117:149–167.

29. Hillerup S, Stoltze K. Lingual nerve injury II. Observations on sensory recovery after micro-neurosurgical reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:1139–1145.

30. Nygaard OP, Kloster R, Mellgren SI. Recovery of sensory nerve fibres after surgical decompression in lumbar radiculopathy: Use of quantitative sensory testing in the exploration of different populations of nerve fibres. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64:120–123.

31. Renton T, Thexton A, Hankins M, McGurk M. Quantitative thermosensory testing of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves in health and after iatrogenic injury. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 41:36–42.

32. Jensen TS, Baron R. Translation of symptoms and signs into mechanisms in neuropathic pain. Pain 2003;102:1–8.

33. Jääskeläinen SK, Teerijoki-Oksa T, Virtanen A, Tenovuo O, Forssell H. Sensory regeneration following intraoperatively verified trigeminal nerve injury. Neurology 2004;62:1951–1957.

34. Hillerup S. Iatrogenic injury to oral branches of the trigeminal nerve: Records of 449 cases. Clin Oral Investig 2007;11: 133–142.

35. Dyck PJ, Zimmerman I, Gillen DA, Johnson D, Karnes JL, O’Brien PC. Cool, warm, and heat-pain detection thresholds: Testing methods and inferences about anatomic distribution of receptors. Neurology 1993;43:1500–1508.

36. Hoitsma E, Reulen JP, de Baets M, Drent M, Spaans F, Faber CG. Small fiber neuropathy: A common and important clinical disorder. J Neurol Sci 2004;227:119–130.

37. Technology review: The Neurometer Current Perception Threshold (CPT). AAEM Equipment and Computer Committee. American Association of Electrodiagnostic medicine. Muscle Nerve 1999;22:523–531.

38. Svensson P, Baad-Hansen L, Thygesen T, Juhl GI, Jensen TS. Overview on tools and methods to assess neuropathic trigeminal pain. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:332–338.

39. Yoon YW, Dong H, Arends JJ, Jacquin MF. Mechanical and cold allodynia in a rat spinal cord contusion model. SomatosensMot Res 2004;21:25–31.