Article Data

  • Views 391
  • Dowloads 55

Original Research

Open Access

Predictors of Clinically Significant Outcome for Adolescents with Temporomandibular Disorders

  • Kerstin Wahlund1,*,
  • Bo Larsson2

1Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Kalmar County Hospital, Kalmar, Sweden

2Regional Center for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare – Central Norway, and National Competency Center for Complex Disorders, St Olav Hospital, Trondheim, Norway

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1774 Vol.31,Issue 3,September 2017 pp.217-224

Published: 30 September 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): Kerstin Wahlund E-mail: kerstin.wahlund@ltkalmar.se

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate and identify baseline characteristics of the adolescent patients included in two previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that may predict a clinically significant outcome after treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) with an occlusal appliance (OA) or relaxation training (RT) in a clinical sample of adolescents. Methods: This study combined two patient samples from the earlier RCTs for a total of 167 adolescents with frequent TMD pain (once a week or more often), diagnosed according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD. They were treated with OA, RT, or received information only (control). Outcome (response to treatment vs nonresponse) was assessed using four measures: the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), pain intensity rated on a numeric rating scale (NRS), pain frequency levels, and pain severity levels prospectively recorded in a pain diary. Predictors of outcome were evaluated posttreatment for the whole sample and at 6 months follow-up for participants from the first trial. Associations and differences between groups obtained in the bivariate analyses were further examined in subsequent multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: At posttreatment, treatment condition (OA being more effective than RT/control), gender (boys being more responsive than girls), arthralgia (predicting lower response), lower levels of somatic complaints (predicting better response), and shorter TMD pain history (predicting better response) emerged as significant predictors of a clinical response. At 6-month follow-up, lower consumption of analgesics and shorter TMD pain history emerged as significant predictors of treatment outcome, while treatment condition approached significance after multivariate analysis. Conclusion: This study revealed that treatment condition and gender were the most consistent predictors of a clinically significant outcome across outcome measures in a clinical sample of adolescents with TMD. Treatment with OA reduced TMD pain in the adolescents.

Keywords

adolescence; occlusal appliance; predictors; relaxation training; temporomandibular disorders

Cite and Share

Kerstin Wahlund,Bo Larsson. Predictors of Clinically Significant Outcome for Adolescents with Temporomandibular Disorders. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2017. 31(3);217-224.

References

1. List T, Wahlund K, Wenneberg B, Dworkin SF. TMD in children and adolescents: Prevalence of pain, gender differences, and perceived treatment need. J Orofac Pain 1999;13:9–20.

2. Nilsson IM, List T, Drangsholt M. Prevalence of temporomandibular pain and subsequent dental treatment in Swedish adolescents. J Orofac Pain 2005;19:144–150.

3. Hongxing L, Astrøm AN, List T, Nilsson IM, Johansson A. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorder pain in Chinese adolescents compared to an age-matched Swedish population. J Oral Rehabil 2016;43:241–248.

4. Hirsch C, John MT, Schaller HG, Türp JC. Pain-related impairment and health care utilization in children and adolescents: A comparison of orofacial pain with abdominal pain, back pain, and headache. Quintessence Int 2006;37:381–390.

5. Nilsson IM, List T, Drangsholt M. Headache and co-morbid pains associated with TMD pain in adolescents. J Dent Res 2013;92:802–807.

6. Karibe H, Shimazu K, Okamoto A, Kawakami T, Kato Y, Warita-Naoi S. Prevalence and association of self-reported anxiety, pain, and oral parafunctional habits with temporomandibular disorders in Japanese children and adolescents: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Oral Health 2015;15:8.

7. List T, Wahlund K, Larsson B. Psychosocial functioning and dental factors in adolescents with temporomandibular disorders: A case-control study. J Orofac Pain 2001;15:218–227.

8. Nilsson IM, Drangsholt M, List T. Impact of temporomandibular disorder pain in adolescents: Differences by age and gender. J Orofac Pain 2009;23:115–122.

9. Hirsch C, Türp JC. Temporomandibular pain and depression in adolescents—A case-control study. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:145–151.

10. van Selms MK, Visscher CM, Naeije M, Lobbezoo F. Bruxism and associated factors among Dutch adolescents. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2013;41:353–363.

11. Franco-Micheloni AL, Fernandes G, de Godoi Gonçalves DA, Camparis CM. Temporomandibular disorders in a young adolescent Brazilian population: Epidemiologic characterization and associated factors. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2015;29:242–249.

12. Fernandes G, van Selms MK, Gonçalves DA, Lobbezoo F, Camparis CM. Factors associated with temporomandibular disorders pain in adolescents. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42:113–119.

13. Kitai N, Takada K, Yasuda Y, Verdonck A, Carels C. Pain and other cardinal TMJ dysfunction symptoms: A longitudinal survey of Japanese female adolescents. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24:741–748.

14. LeResche L, Mancl LA, Drangsholt MT, Huang G, Von Korff M. Predictors of onset of facial pain and temporomandibular disorders in early adolescence. Pain 2007;129:269–278.

15. Carlsson GE, Egermark I, Magnusson T. Predictors of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders: A 20-year follow-up study from childhood to adulthood. Acta Odontol Scand 2002;60:180–185.

16. Skeppar J, Nilner M. Treatment of craniomandibular disorders in children and young adults. J Orofac Pain 1993;7:362–369.

17. Wahlund K, List T, Larsson B. Treatment of temporomandibular disorders among adolescents: A comparison between occlusal appliance, relaxation training, and brief information. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;61:203–211.

18. Wahlund K, Nilsson IM, Larsson B. Treating temporomandibular disorders in adolescents: A randomized, controlled, sequential comparison of relaxation training and occlusal appliance therapy. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2015;29:41–50.

19. Turner JA, Holtzman S, Mancl L. Mediators, moderators, and predictors of therapeutic change in cognitive–behavioral therapy for chronic pain. Pain 2007;127:276–286.

20. Litt MD, Porto FB. Determinants of pain treatment response and nonresponse: Identification of TMD patient subgroups. J Pain 2013;14:1502–1513.

21. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6: 301–355.

22. Wahlund K, List T, Dworkin SF. Temporomandibular disorders in children and adolescents: Reliability of a questionnaire, clinical examination, and diagnosis. J Orofac Pain 1998;12:42–51.

23. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 1988;8(suppl):s1–s96.

24. Larsson B. The role of psychological, health-behaviour and medical factors in adolescent headache. Dev Med Child Neurol 1988;30:616–625.

25. Achenbach TM. Manual for the Youth Self-Report and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry, 1991.

26. Broberg AG, Ekeroth K, Gustafsson PA, et al. Self-reported competencies and problems among Swedish adolescents: A normative study of the YSR. Youth Self Report. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001;10:186–193.

27. Larsson B, Carlsson J, Fichtel A, Melin L. Relaxation treatment of adolescent headache sufferers: Results from a school-based replication series. Headache 2005;45:692–704.

28. Emshoff R, Emshoff I, Bertram S. Estimation of clinically important change for visual analog scales measuring chronic temporomandibular disorder pain. J Orofac Pain 2010;24:262–269.

29. Birnie KA, McGrath PJ, Chambers CT. When does pain matter? Acknowledging the subjectivity of clinical significance. Pain 2012;153:2311–2314.

30. Trautmann E, Lackschewitz H, Kröner-Herwig B. Psychological treatment of recurrent headache in children and adolescents—A meta-analysis. Cephalalgia 2006;26:1411–1426.

31. Nilsson H, Limchaichana N, Nilner M, Ekberg EC. Short-term treatment of a resilient appliance in TMD pain patients: A randomized controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:547–555.

32. Ekberg E, Nilner M. The influence of stabilisation appliance therapy and other factors on the treatment outcome in patients with temporomandibular disorders of arthrogeneous origin. Swed Dent J 1999;23:39–47.

33. Lynch AM, Kashikar-Zuck S, Goldschneider KR, Jones BA. Sex and age differences in coping styles among children with chronic pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007;33:208–216.

34. Gale EN, Funch DP. Factors associated with successful outcome from behavioral therapy for chronic temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain. J Psychosom Res 1984;28:441–448.

35. Fricton JR, Olsen T. Predictors of outcome for treatment of temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1996;10:54–65.

36. Grossi ML, Goldberg MB, Locker D, Tenenbaum HC. Reduced neuropsychologic measures as predictors of treatment outcome in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2001;15:329–339.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top