Article Data

  • Views 351
  • Dowloads 65

Original Research

Open Access

Prospective Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal Intubation During Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation of the Trigeminal Ganglion

  • Cheng-fu Wan1
  • Dao-song Dong1
  • Qi Xi1
  • Yan Liu1
  • Wen-yao Cui1
  • Qiu-shi Wang1
  • Tao Song1,*,

1China Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pain Med, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, Peoples R China

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1785 Vol.32,Issue 2,June 2018 pp.28-33

Published: 30 June 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): Tao Song E-mail: songtaocmu@163.com

Abstract

Aims: To investigate whether nasopharyngeal airway (NPA) intubation could reduce the risk of complications caused by radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) of the trigeminal ganglion. Methods: From November 1, 2014 to May 1, 2015, 200 patients treated with sedation (combination of sufentanil and propofol) were randomly divided into two groups, one in which NPA intubation was used (intervention group) and one in which it was not used (control group). The primary outcome was the frequency of hypoxemia, and secondary outcomes were the frequency of hypotension, nasal mucosa damage, corneal numbness, masticatory weakness, palsies of other cranial nerves, and intracranial hemorrhage. Statistical analyses were performed by using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 19.0. A P value < .05 was considered to reflect statistical significance. Differences in the frequencies of adverse events between the two groups were assessed by using Fisher exact test. Results: Five patients in the intervention group showed minor nasal mucosa injury (P = .027). Hypoxemia (19 vs 3, P < .001), corneal numbness (12 vs 4), and masticatory weakness (11 vs 3) occurred more frequently in the control group than in the intervention group (P < .05). No significant differences in the incidence of hypotension or palsies of other cranial nerves were observed between the two groups (P > .05). Conclusion: NPA intubation can reduce the frequency of hypoxemia and complications related to the thermocoagulation of the trigeminal ganglion with minor risks for nasopharyngeal injury.

Keywords

airway;hypoxemia;radiofrequency thermocoagulation;trigeminal neuralgia

Cite and Share

Cheng-fu Wan,Dao-song Dong,Qi Xi,Yan Liu,Wen-yao Cui,Qiu-shi Wang,Tao Song. Prospective Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal Intubation During Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation of the Trigeminal Ganglion . Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2018. 32(2);28-33.

References

1.Fraioli MF, Cristino B, Moschettoni L, Cacciotti G, Fraioli C. Validity of percutaneous controlled radiofrequency thermoco-agulation in the treatment of isolated third division trigeminal neuralgia. Surg Neurol 2009;71:180–183.

2.Kanpolat Y, Savas A, Bekar A, Berk C. Percutaneous con-trolled radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy for the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: 25-year experience with 1,600 patients. Neurosurgery 2001;48:524–532.

3.Sharma VK, Nguyen CC, Crowell MD, Lieberman DA, de Garmo P, Fleischer DE. A national study of cardiopulmonary un-planned events after GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66:27–34.

4.Thompson AM, Wright DJ, Murray W, Ritchie GL, Burton HD, Stonebridge PA. Analysis of 153 deaths after upper gastrointes-tinal endoscopy: Room for improvement? Surg Endosc 2004; 18:22–25.

5.Jiang Z, Wu X, Liu Y, Ma Z. Reflux-preventing face mask de-signed for painless gastroscopy. J Clin Anesth 2012;24:432.

6.Kouga T, Tanoue K, Matsui K. Airway statuses and nasopha-ryngeal airway use for airway obstruction in syndromic cranio-synostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2014;25:762–765.

7.Zwank M. Middle turbinectomy as a complication of nasopharyn-geal airway placement. Am J Emerg Med 2009;27;513.e3–e4.

8.Enk D, Palmes AM, Van Aken H, Westphal M. Nasotracheal in-tubation: A simple and effective technique to reduce nasopha-ryngeal trauma and tube contamination. Anesth Analg 2002;95: 1432–1436.

9.Roberts K, Whalley H, Bleetman A. The nasopharyngeal air-way: Dispelling myths and establishing the facts. Emerg Med J 2005;22:394–396.

10.Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 2004;24(suppl):9–160.

11.Zheng S, Wu B, Zhao Y, et al. Masticatory muscles dysfunc-tion after CT-guided percutaneous trigeminal radiofrequency thermocoagulation for trigeminal neuralgia: A detailed analysis. Pain Pract 2015;15:712–719.

12.Froehlich F, Thorens J, Schwizer W, et al. Sedation and analge-sia for colonoscopy: Patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespira-tory parameters. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45:1–9.

13.Wehrmann T, Kokabpick S, Lembcke B, Caspary WF, Seifert H. Efficacy and safety of intravenous propofol sedation during routine ERCP: A prospective, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:677–683.

14.van Kleef M, van Genderen WE, Narouze S, et al. 1. Trigeminal neuralgia. Pain Pract 2009;9:252–259.

15.Kanto J, Gepts E. Pharmacokinetic implications for the clinical use of propofol. Clin Pharmacokinet 1989;17:308–326.

16.Riphaus A, Gstettenbauer T, Frenz MB, Wehrmann T. Quality of psychomotor recovery after propofol sedation for routine endoscopy: A randomized and controlled study. Endoscopy 2006;38:677–683.

17.Friedrich K, Stremmel W, Sieg A. Endoscopist-administered propofol sedation is safe—A prospective evaluation of 10,000 patients in an outpatient practice. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2012;21:259–263.

18.Wehrmann T, Riphaus A. Sedation with propofol for interven-tional endoscopic procedures: A risk factor analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008;43:368–374.

19.Björnsson MA, Norberg A, Kalman S, Karlsson MO, Simonsson US. A two-compartment effect site model de-scribes the bispectral index after different rates of propofol infusion. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2010;37:243–255.

20.Kiriyama S, Naitoh H, Kuwano H. Propofol sedation during en-doscopic treatment for early gastric cancer compared to mid-azolam. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:11985–11990.

21.Müller M, Wehrmann T, Eckardt AJ. Prospective evaluation of the routine use of a nasopharyngeal airway (Wendl Tube) during en-doscopic propofol-based sedation. Digestion 2014;89:247–252.

22.Gusmão S, Magaldi M, Arantes A. Trigeminal radiofrequency rhizotomy for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: Results and technical modification [in Portuguese]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2003;61(2B):434–440.

23.Lopez BC, Hamlyn PJ, Zakrzewska JM. Stereotactic radiosur-gery for primary trigeminal neuralgia: State of the evidence and recommendations for future reports. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:1019–1024.

24.Li X, Ni J, Yang L, et al. A prospective study of Gasserian gan-glion pulsed radiofrequency combined with continuous ra-diofrequency for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. J Clin Neurosci 2012;19:824–828.

25.Bajaj Y, Gadepalli C, Knight LC. Securing a nasopharyngeal airway. J Laryngol Otol 2008;122:733–734.

26.Earle R, Shanahan E, Vaghadia H, Sawka A, Tang R. Epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation: A randomized trial of the Parker Flex-Tip nasal endotracheal tube with a posterior facing bev-el versus a standard nasal RAE endotracheal tube. Can J Anaesth 2017;64:370–375.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top