Article Data

  • Views 337
  • Dowloads 42

Original Research

Open Access

Systematic Mapping of Pressure Pain Thresholds of the Masseter and Temporalis Muscles and Assessment of Their Diversity Through the Novel Application of Entropy

  • Ana M. Álvarez-Méndez1
  • Fernando G. Exposto2,3,*,
  • Eduardo E. Castrillon2,3
  • Peter Svensson2,3,4

1Departamento de Enfermería, Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

2Section of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Department of Dentistry, HEALTH, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

3Scandinavian Center for Orofacial Neurosciences (SCON), Huddinge, Sweden

4Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1927 Vol.31,Issue 4,December 2017 pp.362-371

Published: 30 December 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): Fernando G. Exposto E-mail: fernando.exposto@odont.au.dk

Abstract

Aims: To assess the diversity of pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) within the masseter and temporalis muscles by using the novel concept of entropy and to assess the differences in PPT scores between different sites of the masseter and temporalis muscles. Methods: In this randomized, single-blinded study, the left and right masseter and temporalis muscles of 14 healthy volunteers were divided into 15 sites each, and the PPT was assessed for each of these sites. PPT assessments were performed in two different sessions. Entropy and center of gravity (COG) values were calculated for the PPTs of each muscle. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to assess differences between muscles, sides, and sites for PPT, entropy, and COG scores. Results: The main findings were: (1) PPT scores varied significantly between the masseter and temporalis muscles and within each of these muscles; (2) entropy values of PPT scores were not different between the masseter and temporalis muscles; and (3) COG values of PPT scores varied statistically, but these changes do not seem to be clinically relevant. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the anatomical layout of the masseter and temporalis muscles has implications for mechanical pain sensitivity and that areas have different sensitivities within these muscles. Furthermore, reference values for the entropy of PPTs in healthy individuals have been estimated, and comparing these values with those of patients with muscle-related pain conditions can provide quantitative information about the spatial heterogeneity of mechanical pain sensitivity, which may be a valuable clinical outcome measure.

Keywords

entropy; mechanical pain sensitivity; palpation; pressure pain thresholds; quantitative sensory test

Cite and Share

Ana M. Álvarez-Méndez,Fernando G. Exposto,Eduardo E. Castrillon,Peter Svensson. Systematic Mapping of Pressure Pain Thresholds of the Masseter and Temporalis Muscles and Assessment of Their Diversity Through the Novel Application of Entropy. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2017. 31(4);362-371.

References

1. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, List T, et al. Diagnostic criteria for headache attributed to temporomandibular disorders. Cephalalgia 2012;32:683–692.

2. Abboud J, Marchand AA, Sorra K, Descarreaux M. Musculoskeletal physical outcome measures in individuals with tension-type headache: A scoping review. Cephalalgia 2013;33:1319–1336.

3. Ashina S, Babenko L, Jensen R, Ashina M, Magerl W, Bendtsen

L. Increased muscular and cutaneous pain sensitivity in cephalic region in patients with chronic tension-type headache. Eur J Neurol 2005;12:543–549.

4. Burstein R, Noseda R, Borsook D. Migraine: Multiple processes, complex pathophysiology. J Neurosci 2015;35:6619–6629.

5. Andersen S, Petersen MW, Svendsen AS, Gazerani P. Pressure pain thresholds assessed over temporalis, masseter, and frontalis muscles in healthy individuals, patients with tension-type headache, and those with migraine—A systematic review. Pain 2015;156:1409–1423.

6. Fischer AA. Pressure algometry over normal muscles. Standard values, validity and reproducibility of pressure threshold. Pain 1987;30:115–126.

7. Marini I, Bortolotti F, Bartolucci ML, Inelmen EM, Gatto MR, Bonetti GA. Aging effect on pressure pain thresholds of head and neck muscles. Aging Clin Exp Res 2012;24:239–244.

8. Blanksma NG, van Eijden TM. Electromyographic heterogeneity in the human temporalis and masseter muscles during static biting, open/close excursions, and chewing. J Dent Res 1995;74:1318–1327.

9. Korfage JA, Brugman P, Van Eijden TM. Intermuscular and intramuscular differences in myosin heavy chain composition of the human masticatory muscles. J Neurol Sci 2000;178:95–106.

10. Widmer CG, English AW, Morris-Wiman J. Developmental and functional considerations of masseter muscle partitioning. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52:305–308.

11. Chang Y, Cantelmi D, Wisco JJ, Fattah A, Hannam AG, Agur AM. Evidence for the functional compartmentalization of the temporalis muscle: A 3-dimensional study of innervation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:1170–1177.

12. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: Recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:6–27.

13. Binderup AT, Arendt-Nielsen L, Madeleine P. Pressure pain threshold mapping of the trapezius muscle reveals heterogeneity in the distribution of muscular hyperalgesia after eccentric exercise. Eur J Pain 2010;14:705–712.

14. Ohrbach R, Gale EN. Pressure pain thresholds in normal muscles: Reliability, measurement effects, and topographic differences. Pain 1989;37:257–263.

15. Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Ge HY, Cuadrado ML, Madeleine P, Pareja JA, Arendt-Nielsen L. Bilateral pressure pain sensitivity mapping of the temporalis muscle in chronic tension-type headache. Headache 2008;48:1067–1075.

16. Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Madeleine P, Cuadrado ML, Ge HY, Arendt-Nielsen L, Pareja JA. Pressure pain sensitivity mapping of the temporalis muscle revealed bilateral pressure hyperalgesia in patients with strictly unilateral migraine. Cephalalgia 2009;29:670–676.

17. Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 1948;27:379–423, 623–656.

18. Jost L. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 2006;113:363–375.

19. Castrillon EE, Exposto FG, Sato H, et al. Entropy of masseter muscle pain sensitivity: A new technique for pain assessment. JOral Facial Pain Headache 2017;31:87–94.

20. Gonzalez YM, Schiffman E, Gordon SM, et al. Development of a brief and effective temporomandibular disorder pain screening questionnaire: Reliability and validity. J Am Dent Assoc 2011; 142:1183–1191.

21. Thygesen TH, Nørholt SE, Jensen J, Svensson P. Spatial and temporal assessment of orofacial somatosensory sensitivity: A methodological study. J Orofac Pain 2007:21:19–28.

22. Santos Silva RS, Conti PC, Lauris JR, da Silva RO, Pegoraro LF. Pressure pain threshold in the detection of masticatory myofascial pain: An algometer-based study. J Orofac Pain 2005; 19:318–324.

23. Michelotti A, Farella M, Steenks MH, Gallo LM, Palla S. No effect of experimental occlusal interferences on pressure pain thresholds of the masseter and temporalis muscles in healthy women. Eur J Oral Sci 2006;114:167–170.

24. Lee JY, Kim JN, Yoo JY, et al. Topographic anatomy of the masseter muscle focusing on the tendinous digitation. Clin Anat 2012;25:889–892.

25. Kim DH, Hong HS, Won SY, et al. Intramuscular nerve distribution of the masseter muscle as a basis for botulinum toxin injection. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:588–591.

26. Ziccardi VB, Mu L, Schneider RE, Sanders I. Innervation pattern of the temporalis muscle. J Craniofac Surg 1998;9:185–189.

27. Bakke M, Tuxen A, Vilmann P, Jensen BR, Vilmann A, Toft M. Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:164–171.

28. Chesterton LS, Barlas P, Foster NE, Baxter GD, Wright CC. Gender differences in pressure pain threshold in healthy humans.Pain 2003;101:259–266.

29. Jensen R, Rasmussen BK, Pedersen B, Lous I, Olesen J. Cephalic muscle tenderness and pressure pain threshold in a general population. Pain 1992;48:197–203.

30. Isselée H, De Laat A, Bogaerts K, Lysens R. Short-term reproducibility of pressure pain thresholds in masticatory muscles measured with a new algometer. J Orofac Pain 1998;12: 203–209.

31. Isselée H, De Laat A, Lesaffre E, Lysens R. Short-term reproducibility of pressure pain thresholds in masseter and temporalis muscles of symptom-free subjects. Eur J Oral Sci 1997; 105:583–587.

32. Lee KH, Lee MH, Kim HS, Kim JH, Chung SC. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) of head and neck muscles in a normal population. J Musculoskelet Pain 1994;2:67–81.

33. Jensen K, Andersen HO, Olesen J, Lindblom U. Pressure-pain threshold in human temporal region. Evaluation of a new pressure algometer. Pain 1986;25:313–323.

34. Lee TR, Kim YH, Sung PS. Spectral and entropy changes for back muscle fatigability following spinal stabilization exercises.J Rehabil Res Dev 2010;47:133–142.

35. Sung PS, Zurcher U, Kaufman M. Comparison of spectral and entropic measures for surface electromyography time series: A pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007;44:599–609.

36. Rolke R, Baron R, Maier C, et al. Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Standardized protocol and reference values. Pain 2006; 123:231–243.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top