Myofascial Pain: Ultrasound Width of the Masseter Muscle

Aims: To determine whether subjects with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) manifesting as chronic myofascial pain (MFP) involving the masseter muscle present with significantly greater masseter muscle width, as evidenced by ultrasound, compared to individuals without MFP. Methods: A case-control study was carried out. A total of 31 subjects presenting with MFP of the masticatory muscles involving the masseter muscle and 35 controls with TMD but no diagnosis of MFP, matched by age and sex, were included. Ultrasound was used to measure the maximum width of both masseter muscles at the intermediate point between the origin and insertion of the muscle in the light occlusal contact (LOC) position and under maximum contraction. Each side was analyzed separately. Means were compared by using single-factor analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U test; P < .05 was considered to reflect statistical significance. Results: In the study group, the right masseter muscle had a mean ± standard deviation width of 8.6 ± 1.8 mm under LOC (controls: 8.6 ± 1.6 mm; P = .85) and 11.5 ± 2.1 mm under maximum contraction (controls: 11.7 ± 1.9 mm; P = .86). The analagous measures in the left masseter muscle were 8.6 ± 1.6 mm under LOC (controls: 8.2 ± 1.5 mm; P = .42) and 11.3 ± 1.8 mm under maximum contraction (controls: 11.5 ± 1.8 mm) (P = .79), respectively. The increase in width of the right masseter muscle was 2.9 ± 2.1 mm (controls: 3.1 ± 1.2 mm; P = .67) in absolute terms and 1.4 ± 0.3 mm (controls: 1.4 ± 0.2 mm; P = .91) in relative values (width at maximum contraction/LOC width). In the case of the left masseter muscle, the respective values were 2.8 ± 1.7 mm (controls: 3.2 ± 0.9 mm; P = .25) and 1.3 ± 0.2 mm (controls: 1.4 ± 0.1 mm; P = .32). Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in masseter muscle width between MFP subjects and control subjects under LOC conditions or maximum contraction. The increase in width under maximum contraction was likewise not significantly different between the groups.

chronic pain;masseter;myofascial pain;ultrasound

1.Fernandes G, Franco-Micheloni AL, Siqueira JT, Gonçalves DA, Camparis CM. Parafunctional habits are associated cumulatively to painful temporomandibular disorders in adolescents. Braz Oral Res 2016;30. pii: S1806-8324201600100214.

2.Ohrbach R, Bair E, Fillingim RB, et al. Clinical orofacial character-istics associated with risk of first-onset TMD: The OPPERA pro-spective cohort study. J Pain 2013;14(suppl):T33–T50.

3.Phillips SM, Tipton KD, Aarsland A, Wolf SE, Wolfe RR. Mixed muscle protein synthesis and breakdown after resistance exercise in humans. Am J Physiol 1997;273:E99–E107.

4.Burd NA, Mitchell CJ, Churchward-Venne TA, Phillips SM. Bigger weights may not beget bigger muscles: Evidence from acute mus-cle protein synthetic responses after resistance exercise. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2012;37:551–554.

5.Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

6.Shochat T, Gavish A, Arons E, et al. Validation of the BiteStrip screener for sleep bruxism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:e32–e39.

7.Okkerse W, Brebels A, Spaepen AJ, et al. A new method for semi-automatic analysis of surface EMG in patients with oral parafunc-tions. Cranio 2004;22:241–249.

8.Kato T, Masuda Y, Yoshida A, Morimoto T. Masseter EMG activity during sleep and sleep bruxism. Arch Ital Biol 2011;149:478–491.

9.Jadidi F, Nørregaard O, Baad-Hansen L, Arendt-Nielsen L, Svensson P. Assessment of sleep parameters during contingent electrical stimulation in subjects with jaw muscle activity during sleep: A polysomnographic study. Eur J Oral Sci 2011;119:211–218.

10.Goiato MC, Zuim PRJ, Moreno A, et al. Does pain in the masseter and anterior temporal muscles influence maximal bite force? Arch Oral Biol 2017;83:1–6.

11.Prieto L, Lamarca R, Casado A. Assessment of the reliability of clinical findings: The intraclass correlation coefficient [in Spanish]. Med Clin (Barc) 1998;110:142–145.

12.Anderson GC, Gonzalez YM, Ohrbach R, et al. The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. VI: Future directions. J Orofac Pain 2010;24:79–88.

13. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: Recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:6–27.

14.Ariji Y, Sakuma S, Izumi M, et al. Ultrasonographic features of the masseter muscle in female patients with temporomandibular dis- order associated with myofascial pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:337–341.

15.Emshoff R, Emshoff I, Rudisch A, Bertram S. Reliability and tem- poral variation of masseter muscle thickness measurements utiliz- ing ultrasonography. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:1168–1172.

16.Bakke M, Thomsen CE, Vilmann A, Soneda K, Farella M, Møller E.Ultrasonographic assessment of the swelling of the human masseter muscle after static and dynamic activity. Arch Oral Biol 1996;41:133–140.

17.Ariji Y, Sakuma S, Kimura Y, et al. Colour Doppler sonograph-ic analysis of blood-flow velocity in the human facial artery and changes in masseter muscle thickness during low-level static con-traction. Arch Oral Biol 2001;46:1059–1064.

18.Imanimoghaddam M, Davachi B, Madani AS, Nemati S. Ultrasonographic findings of masseter muscle in females with tem-poromandibular disorders. J Craniofac Surg 2013;24:e108–e112.

19.Bertram S, Bodner G, Rudisch A, Brandlmaier I, Emshoff R. Effect of scanning level and muscle condition on ultrasonographic cross-sectional measurements of the anterior masseter muscle. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:430–435.

20.Lione R, Franchi L, Noviello A, Bollero P, Fanucci E, Cozza P. Three-dimensional evaluation of masseter muscle in different ver-tical facial patterns: A cross-sectional study in growing children. Ultrason Imaging 2013;35:307–317.

21.Biondi K, Lorusso P, Fastuca R, et al. Evaluation of masseter mus-cle in different vertical skeletal patterns in growing patients. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2016;17:47–52.

22.Kiliaridis S, Mahboubi PH, Raadsheer MC, Katsaros C. Ultrasonographic thickness of the masseter muscle in growing indi-viduals with unilateral crossbite. Angle Orthod 2007;77:607–611.

23.Bhoyar PS, Godbole SR, Thombare RU, Pakhan AJ. Effect of complete edentulism on masseter muscle thickness and changes after complete denture rehabilitation: An ultrasonographic study. J Investig Clin Dent 2012;3:45–50.

24.Müller F, Hernandez M, Grütter L, Aracil-Kessler L, Weingart D, Schimmel M. Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable im-plant-supported prostheses: A cross-sectional multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:144–150.

25.Close PJ, Stokes MJ, L’Estrange PR, Rowell J. Ultrasonography of masseter muscle size in normal young adults. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:129–134.

26.Tircoveluri S, Singh JR, Rayapudi N, Karra A, Begum M, Challa P. Correlation of masseter muscle thickness and intermolar width—An ultrasonography study. J Int Oral Health 2013;5:28–34.

27.Palinkas M, Bataglion C, de Luca Canto G, et al. Impact of sleep bruxism on masseter and temporalis muscles and bite force. Cranio 2016;34:309–315.

28.Strini PJ, Strini PJ, Barbosa Tde S, Gavião MB. Assessment of thickness and function of masticatory and cervical muscles in adults with and without temporomandibular disorders. Arch Oral Biol 2013;58:1100–1108.

29. Pereira-Cenci T, Pereira LJ, Cenci MS, Bonachela WC, Del Bel Cury AA. Maximal bite force and its association with temporoman-dibular disorders. Braz Dent J 2007;18:65–68.

30.Kogawa EM, Calderon PS, Lauris JR, Araujo CR, Conti PC. Evaluation of maximal bite force in temporomandibular disorders patients. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:559–565.

31.Xu L, Fan S, Cai B, Fang Z, Jiang X. Influence of sustained sub-maximal clenching fatigue test on electromyographic activity and maximum voluntary bite forces in healthy subjects and patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil 2017;44:340–346.