Neurocognition and Neuroplasticity: What Does It All Mean for Clinical Practice?

1. Albanese MC, Duerden EG, Bohotin V, Rainville P, Duncan GH. Differential effects of cognitive demand on human cortical activation associated with vibrotactile stimulation. J Neurophysiol 2009;102:1623–1631.

2. Johansen-Berg H, Lloyd DM. The physiology and psychology of selective attention to touch. Front Biosci 2000;5:D894–D904.

3. Fiorio M, Recchia S, Corra F, Simonetto S, Garcia-Larrea L, Tinazzi M. Enhancing non-noxious perception: Behavioural and neurophysiological correlates of a placebo-like manipulation. Neuroscience 2012;217:96–104.

4. Gazzaley A, Nobre AC. Top-down modulation: Bridging selective attention and working memory. Trends Cogn Sci 2012;16: 129–135.

5. Bauer CC, Diaz JL, Concha L, Barrios FA. Sustained attention to spontaneous thumb sensations activates brain somato-sensory and other proprioceptive areas. Brain Cogn 2014;87: 86–96.

6. Kowalewski R, Kattenstroth JC, Kalisch T, Dinse HR. Improved acuity and dexterity but unchanged touch and pain thresholds following repetitive sensory stimulation of the fingers. Neural Plast 2012;2012:974504.

7. Schlieper S, Dinse HR. Perceptual improvement following repetitive sensory stimulation depends monotonically on stimulation intensity. Brain Stimul 2012;5:647–651.

8. Hodzic A, Veit R, Karim AA, Erb M, Godde B. Improvement and decline in tactile discrimination behavior after cortical plasticity induced by passive tactile coactivation. J Neurosci 2004;24: 442–446.

9. Hoffken O, Veit M, Knossalla F, et al. Sustained increase of somatosensory cortex excitability by tactile coactivation studied by paired median nerve stimulation in humans correlates with perceptual gain. J Physiol 2007;584:463–471.

10. Pleger B, Dinse HR, Ragert P, Schwenkreis P, Malin JP, Tegenthoff M. Shifts in cortical representations predict human discrimination improvement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98: 12255–12260.

11. Ragert P, Franzkowiak S, Schwenkreis P, Tegenthoff M, Dinse HR. Improvement of tactile perception and enhancement of cortical excitability through intermittent theta burst rTMS over human primary somatosensory cortex. Exp Brain Res 2008;184:1–11.

12. Tegenthoff M, Ragert P, Pleger B, et al. Improvement of tactile discrimination performance and enlargement of cortical somatosensory maps after 5 Hz rTMS. PLoS Biol 2005;3:e362.

13. Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S, et al. Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm am-putation. Nature 1995;375:482–484.

14. Henderson LA, Gustin SM, Macey PM, Wrigley PJ, Siddall PJ. Functional reorganization of the brain in humans following spinal cord injury: Evidence for underlying changes in cortical anatomy. J Neurosci 2011;31:2630–2637.

15. Henry EC, Marasco PD, Catania KC. Plasticity of the cortical dentition representation after tooth extraction in naked molerats. J Comp Neurol 2005;485:64–74.

16. Sessle BJ, Yao D, Nishiura H, et al. Properties and plasticity of the primate somatosensory and motor cortex related to orofacial sensorimotor function. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2005; 32:109–114.

17. Avivi-Arber L, Martin R, Lee JC, Sessle BJ. Face sensorimotor cortex and its neuroplasticity related to orofacial sensorimotor functions. Arch Oral Biol 2011;56:1440–1465.

18. Sessle BJ. Face sensorimotor cortex: Its role and neuroplasticity in the control of orofacial movements. Prog Brain Res 2011; 188.:71–82.

19. Luraschi J, Korgaonkar MS, Whittle T, Schimmel M, Muller F, Klineberg I. Neuroplasticity in the adaptation to prosthodontic treatment. J Orofac Pain 2013;27:206–216.

20. Kimoto K, Ono Y, Tachibana A, et al. Chewing-induced regional brain activity in edentulous patients who received mandibular implant-supported overdentures: A preliminary report. J Prosthodont Res 2011;55:89–97.

21. Yan C, Ye L, Zhen J, Ke L, Gang L. Neuroplasticity of edentu-lous patients with implant-supported full dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:387–393.