Article Menu

Export Article

More by Authors Links

Article Data

  • Views 308
  • Dowloads 34

Commentaries

Open Access

Reliability and Validity of the DC/TMD Axis I

  • Michel H. Steenks1,*,
  • Jens Christoph Türp2
  • Anton de Wijer3

1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht, The Netherlands

2Department of Oral Health & Medicine, Division of Temporomandibular Disorders/Orofacial Pain, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

3University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Department of Physical Therapy, Utrecht, The Netherlands

4Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Oral Function & Prosthetic Dentistry, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.2018.1.ar Vol.32,Issue 1,March 2018 pp.27-28

Published: 30 March 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): Michel H. Steenks E-mail: M.H.Steenks@umcutrecht.nl

PDF (70.7 kB) View Full-text

Cite and Share

Michel H. Steenks,Jens Christoph Türp,Anton de Wijer. Reliability and Validity of the DC/TMD Axis I. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2018. 32(1);27-28.

URL:

https://www.jofph.com/articles/10.11607/ofph.2018.1.ar

References

1. Steenks MH, Türp JC, de Wijer A. Reliability and validity of the Diagnostic Criteria forTemporomandibular Disorders Axis I in clinical and research settings: A critical appraisal. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2018;32:7–18.

2. Lobbezoo F, Visscher CM, Naeije M. Some remarks on the RDC/TMD Validation Project: Report of an IADR/Toronto-2008 workshop discussion. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:779–783.

3. Svensson P, Michelotti A, Lobbezoo F, List T. The many faces of persistent orofacial muscle pain. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2015;29:207–208.

4. Gonzalez YM, Schiffman E, Gordon SM, et al. Development of a brief and effective temporomandibular disorder pain screen- ing questionnaire: Reliability and validity. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:1183–1191.

5. Ohrbach R. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disor- ders Clinical Protocol and Assessment Instruments. Version: 20Jan2014. https://www.mah.se/PageFiles/770497432/DC- TMD%20Axis%20I%20_Axis%20II%20Protocol%20-%20 2013_06_08.pdf. Accessed 9 January, 2018.

6. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: Recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:6–27.

7. Lobbezoo-Scholte AM. Diagnostic Subgroups of Craniomandibular Disorders [thesis]. Utrecht, Netherlands: University of Utrecht, 1993.

8. de Leeuw R. Psychosocial Aspects and Symptom Character- istics of Craniomandibular Dysfunction [thesis]. Utrecht, Neth- erlands: University of Utrecht, 1993.

9. de Wijer A. Temporomandibular and Cervical Spine Disorders [thesis]. Utrecht, Netherlands: University of Utrecht, 1995.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top