The International Classification of Orofacial Pain: What Have We Gained, and What Is Still Missing?

Maria Pigg

doi:10.11607/ofph.2020.2.e

Article Menu

Export Article

Article Data

Views 3323
Dowloads 80

Editorials

Open Access

The International Classification of Orofacial Pain: What Have We Gained, and What Is Still Missing?

Maria Pigg

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.2020.2.e Vol.34,Issue 2,June 2020 pp.117-118

Published: 30 June 2020

PDF (84.6 kB) View Full-text

Cite and Share

Maria Pigg. The International Classification of Orofacial Pain: What Have We Gained, and What Is Still Missing? Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2020; 34(2): 117-118. doi: 10.11607/ofph.2020.2.e

URL:

https://www.jofph.com/articles/10.11607/ofph.2020.2.e

References

1. Häggman-Henrikson B, Liv P, Ilgunas A, et al. Increasing gender differences in the prevalence and chronification of orofacial pain in the population. Pain 2020. Epub ahead of print.

2. Gaskin DJ, Richard P. The economic costs of pain in the United States. J Pain 2012;13:715–724.

3. Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin Books, 2011.

4. International Classification of Orofacial Pain, 1st edition (ICOP). Cephalalgia 2020;40:129–221.

5. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: Recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:6–27.

6. Glickman GN. AAE Consensus Conference on Diagnostic Terminology: Background and perspectives. J Endod 2009;35: 1619–1620.

7. Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment. Methods of Diagnosis and Treatment in Endodontics: A Systematic Review [Internet]. Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU), 2010.

8. The EQUATOR Network. https://www.equator-network.org.