Can We Further Improve Clinical Orofacial Pain Research?

1. Equator network. Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research. Accessed 6 March 2023. https://www. equator-network.org/

2. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache Guidelines for Authors. Updated July 2020. Accessed 6 March 2023. http:// www.quintpub.com/journals/ofph/guidelines.pdf

3. Häggman-Henrikson B, Lobbezoo F, Durham J, Peck C, List T. The voice of the patient in orofacial pain management. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2022;22(1S):101648.

4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome mzeasures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims: Draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:79.

5. Hua F. Increasing the value of orthodontic research through the use of dental patient-reported outcomes. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2019;19:99–105.

6. John MT. Standardization of dental patient-reported outcomes measurement using OHIP-5–Validation of Recommendations for use and scoring of Oral Health Impact Profile versions. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2022;22(1S):101645.

7. Reissmann DR. Dental patient-reported outcome measures are essential for evidence-based prosthetic dentistry. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2019;19:1–6.

8. Shayestehpour S, Sharma K, Mosor E, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures for pediatric dental patients: A methodological review and mapping exercise. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2022;22(1S):101661.

9. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: Recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:6–27.

10. International Classification of Orofacial Pain, 1st edition (ICOP). Cephalalgia 2020;40:129–221.

11. COMET Initiative. Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials. Accessed 6 March 2023. https://www.comet-initiative.org/

12. Murad MH, Asi N, Alsawas M, Alahdab F. New evidence pyramid. Evid Based Med 2016;21:125–127.

13. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005;113:9–19.

14. Carey B, Farag AM, Nasri-Heir C, et al. IMMPACT-recommended outcome measures and tools of assessment in burning mouth syndrome RCTs: An international Delphi survey protocol. Trials 2020;21:711.

15. Nova CV, Zakrzewska JM, Baker SR, Riordain RN. Treatment outcomes in trigeminal neuralgia–A systematic review of domains, dimensions and measures. World Neurosurg X 2020;6:100070.

16. Haythornthwaite JA. IMMPACT recommendations for clinical trials: Opportunities for the RDC/TMD. J Oral Rehabil

2010;37:799–806.

17. Lobbezoo F, Aarab G, Kapos FP, et al. The global need for easy and valid assessment tools for orofacial pain. J Dent Res 2022;101:1549–1553.

18. Powell JT, Koelemay MJW. Systematic reviews of the literature are not always either useful or the best way to add to science. EJVES Vasc Forum 2021;54:2–6.

19. Ioannidis JP. The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Milbank Q 2016;94:485–514.

20. Manfredini D, Greene CS, Ahlberg J, De Laat A, Lobbezoo F, Klasser GD. Evidence-based dentistry or meta-analysis illness? A commentary on current publishing trends in the field of temporomandibular disorders and bruxism. J Oral Rehabil 2019;46:1–4.

21. Roberts I, Ker K. How systematic reviews cause research waste. Lancet 2015;386(10003):1536.