Article Data

  • Views 494
  • Dowloads 79

Reviews

Open Access

Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Myofascial Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Fernando M. Munguia1
  • John Jang1
  • Mahmoud Salem1
  • Glenn T. Clark2
  • Reyes Enciso3,*,

1USC, Herman Ostrow Sch Dent, Sci Program Orofacial Pain & Oral Med, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA

2USC, Herman Ostrow Sch Dent, Div Periodontol Diagnost Sci & Dent Hyg, Sci Orofacial Pain & Oral Med Program, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA

3USC, Herman Ostrow Sch Dent, Div Dent Publ Hlth & Pediat Dent, 925 West 34th St,Room 4268, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.2032 Vol.32,Issue 3,September 2018 pp.287-297

Published: 30 September 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): Reyes Enciso E-mail: renciso@usc.edu

Abstract

Aims: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in treating temporomandibular myofascial pain in adults compared to laser placebo. Methods: Randomized, placebo-controlled studies were identified by a search on March 2, 2016 and updated on February 9, 2017 in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Three of the authors assessed the studies for risk of bias. Outcomes included pain reduction on a visual analog scale (VAS) and interincisal opening. Results: The initial search strategy yielded 142 unduplicated references assessed independently by three review authors. After evaluation, this number was reduced to eight relevant studies for inclusion in this review. Of these eight studies, four were at unclear risk of bias and four were at high risk. In a meta-analysis, pain intensity was significantly reduced after treatment in the group that received LLLT as compared to laser placebo (an average of 2.2 units on a scale of 0 to 10) (P = .005) and an average of 2.4 units 3 to 4 weeks later (P = .022). Pooled results showed a significant increase in interincisal opening at 1 month after treatment (P = .012), but not when the treatment was completed (P = .079). Conclusion: The findings from this systematic review showed that LLLT seems to be effective in reducing pain in patients with temporomandibular myofascial pain with moderate-quality evidence. However, due to the high heterogeneity, small number, and high risk of bias of the included studies, the results are not definitive, and further well-designed studies are needed.

Keywords

low-level laser therapy;meta-analysis;myofascial pain;randomized controlled trials;visual analog scale

Cite and Share

Fernando M. Munguia,John Jang,Mahmoud Salem,Glenn T. Clark,Reyes Enciso. Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Myofascial Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2018. 32(3);287-297.

References

1.Travell J, Simons D. Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1983.

2.Dworkin SF. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Current status & future relevance. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37:734–743.

3.Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

4.Simons DG. Review of enigmatic MTrPs as a common cause of enigmatic musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2004;14:95–107.

5.Bron C, Dommerholt JD. Etiology of myofascial trigger points. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2012;16:439–444.

6.Kitchen S, Partridge C. A review of low level laser therapy: Part I: Background, physiological effects and hazards. Physiotherapy 1991;77:161–168.

7.Melis M, Di Giosia M, Zawawi KH. Low level laser therapy for the treatment of temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review of the literature. Cranio 2012;30:304–312.

8.Simunovic Z. Low level laser therapy with trigger points tech-nique: A clinical study on 243 patients. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1996;14:163–167.

9.Bjordal JM, Johnson MI, Iversen V, Aimbire F, Lopes-Martins RA. Low-level laser therapy in acute pain: A systematic review of pos-sible mechanisms of action and clinical effects in randomized placebo-controlled trials. Photomed Laser Surg 2006;24:158–168.

10.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.

11.Carrasco TG, Guerisoli LD, Guerisoli DM, Mazzetto MO. Evaluation of low intensity laser therapy in myofascial pain syn-drome. Cranio 2009;27:243–247.

12.Ahrari F, Madani AS, Ghafouri ZS, Tunér J. The efficacy of low-level laser therapy for the treatment of myogenous temporomandibular joint disorder. Lasers Med Sci 2014;29:551–557.

13.Cetiner S, Kahraman SA, Yücetas S¸u. Evaluation of low-level laser therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders. Photomed Laser Surg 2006;24:637–641.

14.Demirkol N, Sari F, Bulbul M, Demirkol M, Simsek I, Usumez A. Effectiveness of occlusal splints and low-level laser therapy on myofascial pain. Lasers Med Sci 2015;30:1007–1012.

15.de Moraes Maia ML, Ribeiro MA, Maia LG, et al. Evaluation of low-level laser therapy effectiveness on the pain and masticato-ry performance of patients with myofascial pain. Lasers Med Sci 2014;29:29–35.

16.Shirani AM, Gutknecht N, Taghizadeh M, Mir M. Low-level laser therapy and myofacial pain dysfunction syndrome: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci 2009;24:715–720.

17.Uemoto L, Garcia MA, Gouvêa CV, Vilella OV, Alfaya TA. Laser therapy and needling in myofascial trigger point deactivation. J Oral Sci 2013;55:175–181.

18.Venezian GC, da Silva MA, Mazzetto RG, Mazzetto MO. Low level laser effects on pain to palpation and electromyographic activity in TMD patients: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Cranio 2010;28:84–91.

19.Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org. Accessed 05 February 2018.

20.Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experi-ments. Biometrics 1954;10:101–129.

21.Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539–1558.

22.Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J 2001;18:205–207.

23.Herranz-Aparicio J, Vázquez-Delgado E, Arnabat-Domínguez J, España-Tost A, Gay-Escoda C. The use of low level laser therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders. Review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013;18:e603–e612.

24.Chen J, Huang Z, Ge M, Gao M. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the treatment of TMDs: A meta-analysis of 14 randomised con-trolled trials. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42:291–299.

25.Doeuk C, Hersant B, Bosc R, et al. Current indications for low level laser treatment in maxillofacial surgery: A review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;53:309–315.

26.Shukla D, Muthusekhar M. Efficacy of low-level laser thera-py in temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2016;7:62–66.

27.Petrucci A, Sgolastra F, Gatto R, Mattei A, Monaco A. Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in temporomandibular dis-orders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orofac Pain 2011; 25:298–307.

28.Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and re-search applications: Recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:6–27.

29.Mazzetto MO, Hotta TH, Pizzo RC. Measurements of jaw move-ments and TMJ pain intensity in patients treated with GaAlAs laser. Braz Dent J 2010;21:356–360.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top