Article Data

  • Views 544
  • Dowloads 102

Original Research

Open Access

Malocclusion and Temporomandibular Disorders: Verification of the Controversy

  • Amira A. Aboalnaga1
  • Nehal M. Amer1
  • Mohamed O. Elnahas1
  • Mona M. Salah Fayed1,2,*,
  • Sanaa A. Soliman1
  • Amr E. ElDakroury1
  • Amr H. Labib1
  • Fady H. Fahim1

1Cairo Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, 11 Saraya ElManial St, Cairo, Egypt

2Univ Malaya, Fac Dent, Dept Pediat Dent & Orthodont, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.2260 Vol.33,Issue 4,December 2019 pp.440-450

Submitted: 14 May 2018 Accepted: 20 January 2019

Published: 30 December 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): Mona M. Salah Fayed E-mail: mona.fayed@um.edu.my

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the dental and skeletal aspects of malocclusion in the anteroposterior and vertical dimensions in a sample of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients and to correlate these aspects with the signs and symptoms of TMD. Methods: A total of 150 TMD patients were divided into five groups according to the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD: Group 1 = myalgia (M); Group 2 = disc displacement with reduction (DDWR); Group 3 = disc displacement without reduction (DDWOR); Group 4 = degenerative disorders (D); and Group 5 = subluxation (S). Molar and canine relations, overjet, overbite, occlusal guidance, occlusal interferences, and centric slides were recorded for each patient, and the skeletal craniofacial patterns were analyzed for each patient using cone beam computed tomography. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the variable means of the different groups. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlations of quantitative continuous variables. Significance level was considered at P < .05. Results: No significant difference was found among the groups regarding any aspects of dental occlusion except for mediotrusive interferences, which were significantly higher in Group 3 (DDWOR) (P = .02). Regarding skeletal craniofacial pattern, Group 4 (D) had significantly smaller mean± standard deviation sella-nasion–B (SNB) point angle (74.31 ± 3.04 degrees) than Group 3 (DDWOR) (78.04 ± 4.88 degrees), and Group 1 (M) showed the greatest SNB angle (79.87 ± 3.73 degrees) (P = .03). Group 3 (DDWOR) showed significantly greater mean mandibular plane/SN angle (39.56 ± 6.19 degrees) than Group 1 (M) (34.73 ± 5.65 degrees) (P = .04). Relations between occlusal variables and TMD parameters were nonsignificant. Conclusion: This study provides robust evidence to diminish the TMD-malocclusion association, especially in myogenic types of TMD.

Keywords

craniofacial pattern;DC/TMD;malocclusion;temporomandibular disorders

Cite and Share

Amira A. Aboalnaga,Nehal M. Amer,Mohamed O. Elnahas,Mona M. Salah Fayed,Sanaa A. Soliman,Amr E. ElDakroury,Amr H. Labib,Fady H. Fahim. Malocclusion and Temporomandibular Disorders: Verification of the Controversy. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2019. 33(4);440-450.

References

1. Okeson JP, American Academy of Orofacial Pain. Orofacial Pain: Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996.

2. De Leeuw R. Orofacial Pain: Guidelines for Classification, Assessment, and Management, ed 4. Chicago: 2008.

3. McNeill C. Temporomandibular Disorders: Guidelines for Classification, Assessment, and Management. Chicago: Quin- tessence, 1993.

4. Okeson JP. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion, ed 7. St Louis: Mosby, 2012.5. Visscher CM, obbezoo F. TMD pain is partly heritable. A sys- tematic review of family studies and genetic association stud- ies. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42:386–399.

6. Berger M, Szalewski L, Bakalczuk M, Bakalczuk G, Bakalczuk S, Szkutnik J. Association between estrogen levels and tem- poromandibular disorders: A systematic literature review. Prz Menopauzalny 2015;14:260–270.

7. Roldán-Barraza C, Janko S, Villanueva J, Araya I, Lauer HC. A systematic review and meta-analysis of usual treatment versus psychosocial interventions in the treatment of myofascial tem- poromandibular disorder pain. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:205–222.

8. Maísa Soares G, Rizzatti-Barbosa CM. Chronicity factors of temporomandibular disorders: A critical review of the litera- ture. Braz Oral Res 2015;29. Epub 2015 January 3.

9. McNamara JA Jr, Seligman DA, Okeson JP. Occlusion, ortho- dontic treatment, and temporomandibular disorders: A review. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:73–90.

10. Manfredini D, Perinetti G, Stellini E, Di Leonardo B, Guarda- Nardini L. Prevalence of static and dynamic dental malocclusion features in subgroups of temporomandibular disorder patients: Implications for the epidemiology of the TMD-occlusion asso- ciation. Quintessence Int 2015;46:341–349.

11. Manfredini D, Perinetti G, Guarda-Nardini L. Dental malocclu- sion is not related to temporomandibular joint clicking: A logis- tic regression analysis in a patient population. Angle Orthod 2014;84:310–315.

12. Zonnenberg AJ, Mulder J. The incidence of centric slides in healthy individuals and TMD patients. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2013;21:109–113.

13. Türp JC, Schindler H. The dental occlusion as a suspected cause for TMDs: Epidemiological and etiological consider- ations. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:502–512.

14. Manfredini D, Castroflorio T, Perinetti G, Guarda-Nardini L. Dental occlusion, body posture and temporomandibular disor- ders: Where we are now and where we are heading for. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:463–471.

15. Coêlho TG, Caracas HC. Perception of the relationship be- tween TMD and orthodontic treatment among orthodontists. Dental Press J Orthod 2015;20:45–51.

16. Luther F. Orthodontics and the temporomandibular joint: Where are we now? Part 1. Orthodontic treatment and tem- poromandibular disorders. Angle Orthod 1998;68:295–304.

17. Michelotti A, Iodice G. The role of orthodontics in temporo- mandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:411–429.

18. Bavia PF, Rodrigues Garcia RC. Vertical craniofacial morphol- ogy and its relation to temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2016;7:e6.

19. Colonna A, Manfredini D, Lombardo L, et al. Comparative analysis of jaw morphology and temporomandibular disorders: A three-dimension imaging study. Cranio 2018:1–10.

20. Hwang CJ, Sung SJ, Kim SJ. Lateral cephalometric char- acteristics of malocclusion patients with temporomandibu- lar joint disorder symptoms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:497–503.

21. Jung WS, Kim H, Jeon DM, Mah SJ, Ahn SJ. Magnetic reso- nance imaging-verified temporomandibular joint disk displace- ment in relation to sagittal and vertical jaw deformities. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:1108–1115.

22. Manfredini D, Segù M, Arveda N, et al. Temporomandibular joint disorders in patients with different facial morphology. A systematic review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74:29–46.

23. Mohlin B, Axelsson S, Paulin G, et al. TMD in relation to maloc- clusion and orthodontic treatment: A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2007;77:542–548.

24. Mackie A, Lyons K. The role of occlusion in temporomandib- ular disorders—A review of the literature. N Z Dent J 2008; 104:54–59.

25. Badel T, Marotti M, Pavicin IS, Basic´-Kes V. Temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. Acta Clin Croat 2012;51:419–424.

26. Farronato G, Rosso G, Giannini L, Galbiati G, Maspero C. Correlation between skeletal Class II and temporomandib- ular joint disorders: A literature review. Minerva Stomatol 2016;65:239–247.

27. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: Recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:6–27.

28. Sakar O, Calisir F, Oztas E, Marsan G. Evaluation of the effects of temporomandibular joint disk displacement and its progres- sion on dentocraniofacial morphology in symptomatic patients using lateral cephalometric analysis. Cranio 2011;29:211–218.

29. Plesh O, Sinisi SE, Crawford PB, Gansky SA. Diagnoses based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders in a biracial population of young women. J Orofac Pain 2005;19:65–75.

30. Angle EH. Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos 1988;41:248–264.

31. Dawson PE. Evaluation, Diagnosis and Treatment of Occlusal Problems, ed 2. St Louis: Mosby, 1989.

32. Graber TM. Orthodontics: Principles and Practice, ed 3. Philadelphia: W.R. Saunders, 1972.

33. Rinchuse DJ, Sassouni V. An evaluation of eccentric occlu- sal contacts in orthodontically treated subjects. Am J Orthod 1982;82:251–256.

34. Department of Oral Medicine Orofacial Pain Research Group. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. University of Washington Department of Oral Medicine, 2011. https://ubwp.buffalo.edu/rdc-tmdinterna- tional/wp-content/uploads/sites/58/2017/01/RDC_Booklet_ updated2011-modified_2015_12_01-1.pdf. Accessed 24 April, 2019.

35. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam com- puted tomography in orthodontics. [Corrected]. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 116:238–257.

36. Swennen GRJ, Schutyser F, Hausamen JE. Three-dimensional cephalometry: A color atlas and manual. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2005.

37. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A Jr, Tartaglia GM. The use of lin- ear and angular measurements of maxillo-mandibular antero- posterior discrepancies. Clin Orthod Res 1999;2:34–41.

38. Anwar N, Fida M. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:516–522.

39. Kirveskari P, Alanen P. Association between tooth loss and TMJ dysfunction. J Oral Rehabil 1985;12:189–194.

40. Schmid-Schwap M, Bristela M, Kundi M, Piehslinger E. Sex- specific differences in patients with temporomandibular disor- ders. J Orofac Pain 2013;27:42–50.

41. Robinson ME, George SZ, Dannecker EA. Sex differences in pain anchors revisited: Further investigation of “most intense” and common pain events. Eur J Pain 2004;8:299–305.

42. El-Mangoury NH, Mostafa YA. Epidemiologic panorama of dental occlusion. Angle Orthod 1990;60:207–214.

43. Kim BI, Bayome M, Kim Y, et al. Comparison of overjet among 3 arch types in normal occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e253–e260.

44. Ceylan I, Eröz UB. The effects of overbite on the maxillary and mandibular morphology. Angle Orthod 2001;71:110–115.

45. Rinchuse DJ, Kandasamy S, Sciote J. A contemporary and evidence-based view of canine protected occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:90–102.

46. Bósio JA, Burch JG, Tallents RH, Wade DB, Beck FM. Lateral cephalometric analysis of asymptomatic volunteers and symp- tomatic patients with and without bilateral temporomandibu- lar joint disk displacement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:248–255.

47. Araujo RP, Groppo FC, Ferreira LE, Guimarães AS, Figueroba SR. Correlation between facial types and muscle TMD in women: An anthropometric approach. Braz Oral Res 2015;29.

48. Ahn SJ, Kim TW, Nahm DS. Cephalometric keys to inter- nal derangement of temporomandibular joint in women with Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:486–494.

49. Jung WS, Kim H, Jeon DM, Mah SJ, Ahn SJ. Magnetic reso- nance imaging-verified temporomandibular joint disk displace- ment in relation to sagittal and vertical jaw deformities. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:1108–1115.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top