Article Menu

Export Article

More by Authors Links

Article Data

  • Views 265
  • Dowloads 39

Commentaries

Open Access

Authors’ Response to Critical Commentaries: Validity of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis I in Clinical and Research Settings

  • Michel H. Steenks1,2,*,
  • Anton de Wijer1,2

1Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, Division Surgical Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht, The Netherlands

2Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dental Science, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.23.1.06 Vol.23,Issue 1,March 2009 pp.26-27

Published: 30 March 2009

*Corresponding Author(s): Michel H. Steenks E-mail: m.h.steenks@umcutrecht.nl

PDF (41.66 kB) View Full-text

Cite and Share

Michel H. Steenks,Anton de Wijer. Authors’ Response to Critical Commentaries: Validity of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis I in Clinical and Research Settings. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2009. 23(1);26-27.

URL:

https://www.jofph.com/articles/10.11607/ofph.23.1.06

References

1. Goulet J-P. Critical commentary on focus article: Validity of the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders Axis I in clinical and research settings. J Orofac Pain 2009;23:17–19.

2. Greene CS. Critical commentary on focus article: Validity of the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders Axis I in clinical and research settings. J Orofac Pain 2009;23:20–23.

3. Svensson P. Critical commentary on focus article: Validity of the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders Axis I in clinical and research settings. J Orofac Pain 2009;23:24–25.

4. Steenks MH, de Wijer A. Focus Article: Validity of the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders Axis I in clinical and research settings. J Orofac Pain 2009;23:9–16.

5. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

6. Truelove EL, Sommers EE, LeResche L, Dworkin SF, Von Korff M. Clinical diagnostic criteria for TMD: New classification permits multiple diagnoses. J Am Dent Assoc 1992;123:47-54.

7. Steenks MH. Inclusion, exclusion or diagnosis? [guest editorial] J Orofac Pain 2004;18:81.

8. Steenks MH. The gap between dental education and clinical treatment in temporomandibular disorders and orofacial pain. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:475–477.

9. Cimino R, Steenks MH, Michelotti A, Farella M, PierFrancesco N. Mandibular condyle osteochondroma. Review of the literature and report of a misdiagnosed case. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:254–261.

10. Yap AUJ, Dworkin SF, Chua EK, List T. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorder subtypes, psychologic distress, and psychological dysfunction in Asian patients. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:21–28.

11. List T, Dworkin SF. Comparing TMD diagnoses and clinical findings at Swedish and US TMD centers using research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1996;10:240–253.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top