Ethnic Background as a Factor in Temporomandibular Disorder Complaints

Aims: To examine the associations between the ethnic backgrounds of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients in the Netherlands and the level of TMD pain complaints and psychological/behavioral factors and whether these associations are influenced by socioeconomic factors. Methods: A sample of 504 consecutive patients from a TMD clinic completed the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD) Axis II questionnaire (pain intensity, pain-related disability, somatization, depression, ethnic background, and socioeconomic status), an oral parafunctions questionnaire, and questions related to stress. Ethnic background was classified, following the method of Statistics Netherlands (CBS), using the country of birth from subject and both parents. This resulted in a classification into three subgroups: Native Dutch (ND; 69.6%), Non-Native Western (NNW; 14.8%), and Non-Native Non-Western (NNNW; 15.6%). Statistics used were chi-square, one- and two-way ANOVA, and Kruskall-Wallis tests; for post-hoc interpretation, standardized residual values, Bonferroni, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used. Results: No differences in age or gender were found between the three ethnic groups, nor were there any differences in characteristic pain intensity or oral parafunctions. However, TMD patients from the NNNW subgroup had significantly higher scores on psychological factors, namely pain-related disability, disability days, somatization, depression, and stress. These patients had a lower incidence of employment, a lower level of education, and a lower income level than patients from the ND and NNW ethnic backgrounds. Analysis of variance showed no interaction effects between ethnic background and socioeconomic factors in relation to the psychological variables mentioned. Conclusion: Ethnic background of TMD patients in the Netherlands is associated with psychological factors, regardless of socioeconomic status, but not with TMD pain complaints or oral parafunctions.

ethnic background; pain; pain-related disability; socioeconomic status; temporomandibular disorders

1. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. Cranio 1992;6:301–355.

2. International RDC/TMD Consortium website. Available at: www.rdc-tmdinternational.org/translations/frmtranslations.htm.

3. Yap AUJ, Dworkin SF, Chua EK, List Th, Tan, KBC, Tan HH. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorder subtypes, psychologic distress, and psychological dysfunction in Asian patients. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:21–29.

4. Plesh O, Sinisi SE, Crawford PB, Gansky SA. Diagnoses based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders in a biracial population of young women. J Orofac Pain 2005;19:65–76.

5. Widmalm SE, Christiansen RL, Gunn SM. Race and gender as TMD risk factors in children. Cranio 1995; 13:163–166.

6. Reiter S, Eli I, Gavish A, Winocur E. Ethnic differences in temporomandibular disorders between Jewish and Arab populations in Israel according to RDC/TMD evaluation. J Orofac Pain 2006;20:36–43.

7. Lobbezoo F, van Selms MK, John MT, Huggins K, Ohrbach R, Visscher CM, van der Zaag J, van der Meulen MJ, Naeije M, Dworkin SF. Use of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders for multinational research: translation efforts and reliability assessment in The Netherlands. J Orofac Pain 2005;19:301–308.

8. Meulen MJ van der, Lobbezoo F, Aartman IHA, Naeije

M. Self-reported oral parafunctions and pain intensity in temporomandibular disorder patients. J Orofac Pain 2006;20:31–36.

9. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992;50:133–149.

10. Arrindell WA, Ettema JHM. Symptom checklist SCL-90: Handleiding bij een Multi-dimensionele Psychopathologie-indicator. Lisse: Swets Test Publishers, 1986.

11. Bhopal R, Donaldson L. White, European, Western, Caucasian, or what? Inappropriate labelling in research on race, ethnicity, and health. Am J Public Health 1998; 88:1303–1307.

12. Edwards ChL, Fillingim RB, Keefe F. Race, ethnicity and pain. Pain 2001;94:133–137.

13. Sheldon, TA., Parker H. Race and ethnicity in health research. J Public Health Med 1992;14:104–110.

14. LaVeist ThA. On the study of race, racism, and health: A shift from description to explanation. Int J Health Serv 2000;30:217–219.

15. Roberts DE. Legal constraints on the use of race in biomedical research: toward a social justice framework. J Law Med Ethics 2006: 526–535.

16. Kaplan, JB, Bennett, T. Use of race and ethnicity in biomedical publications. JAMA 2003;289:2709–2716.

17. Bhopal R. Race and ethnicity: Responsible use from epidemiological and public health perspective. J Law Med Ethics 2006;39:500–507.

18. Shanawani H, Dame L, Schwartz DA, Cook-Deegan, R. Non-reporting and inconsistent reporting of race and ethnicity in articles that claim associations among genotype, outcome, and race or ethnicity. J Med Ethics 2007;32: 724–728.

19. Groenendijk K. Allochtonen of burgers: definitiemacht in debat en wetgeving over immigranten. In: Duyvendak JW et al. Macht en Verantwoordelijkheid. Essays voor Kees Schuyt. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2007:101–112.

20. Stronks K, Ravelli ACJ, Reijneveld SA. Immigrants in the Netherlands: Equal access for equal needs? J Epidemiol Community Health 2001;55:701–707.

21. Sue S, Dhindsa MK. Ethnic and racial health disparities research: Issues and problems. Health Educ & Behav 2006;33;459–469.

22. Hilton C. For debate: Collecting ethnic group data for inpatients: is it useful? Br Med J 1996;313:923–925.