Article Data

  • Views 294
  • Dowloads 44

Original Research

Open Access

Predicting the Outcome of a Physical Medicine Treatment for Temporomandibular Disorder Patients

  • Glenn T. Clark1
  • Kazuyoshi Baba2,*,
  • Charles P. McCreary3

1Center for Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Sciences School of Dentistry, University of Southern California Los Angeles, California, USA

2Department of Prosthodontics School of Dentistry, Showa University Tokyo, Japan

3Neuropsychiatric Institute, Department of Biobehavioral Sciences University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, California, USA

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.23.3.08 Vol.23,Issue 3,September 2009 pp.221-229

Published: 30 September 2009

*Corresponding Author(s): Kazuyoshi Baba E-mail: kazuyoshi@dent.showa-u.ac.jp

Abstract

Aims: To investigate whether any of the pretreatment physical signs, symptoms, and responses on psychological questionnaires would predict treatment outcomes after a standardized temporomandibular disorder (TMD) treatment program. Methods: The care provided to 157 TMD patients was a short course of physical therapy, an occlusal appliance, and over-the-counter nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OTC NSAIDs). A multidimensional outcome assessment was performed using six variables. Follow-up data were available on 81.5% of enrolled subjects and elapsed time from initial visit to the two follow-up points was 13 ± 4.7 and 33.6 ± 9.8 months, respectively. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between 18 predictor variables and the six outcome variables. Results: The results showed that the combination of a higher initial visual analog scale (VAS) pain score plus a lower jaw function interference score was significantly associated with a reduction of VAS pain after treatment (P < .05; adjusted R2 = 0.54). Moreover, the combination of a higher initial activity limitation score plus a lower jaw function interference score was associated with a greater reduction of the activity limitation score after treatment (P < .05; adjusted R2 = 0.36). None of the other outcomes were found to relate to any of the pretreatment variables. It must be noted that no single variable was a strong predictor and the odds ratios between the above three variables and the predicted outcomes were not robust. Conclusion: The corollary of these results suggests that if a high degree of jaw function interference is present (eg, clicking, locking), then the prognosis of improvement with brief self-directed physical therapy, an occlusal appliance, and OTC NSAID is lower, at least within the time frame of this study.

Keywords

multiple logistic regression analysis; physical medicine treatment; predictors; temporomandibular disorders; treatment outcome

Cite and Share

Glenn T. Clark,Kazuyoshi Baba,Charles P. McCreary. Predicting the Outcome of a Physical Medicine Treatment for Temporomandibular Disorder Patients. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2009. 23(3);221-229.

References

1. McNeill C (ed). Temporomandibular Disorders: Guidelines for Classification, Assessment, and Management. Chicago: Quintessence, 1993:11.

2. Clark GT. Diagnosis and treatment of painful temporomandibular disorders. Dent Clin of North Am 1987;31: 645–674.

3. Clark GT, Seligman DA, Solberg, WK, Pullinger AG. Guidelines for the examination and diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders. J Craniomandib Disord 1989;3: 7–14.

4. McNeill C, Mohl ND, Rugh JD, Tanaka TT. Temporomandibular disorders: Diagnosis, management, education, and research. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:253–261.

5. Greene CS, Laskin DM. Long-term evaluation of treatment for myofascial pain-dysfunction syndrome: A comparative analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;107:235–238.

6. Wedel A, Carlsson GE. Factors influencing the outcome of treatment in patients referred to a temporomandibular joint clinic. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:420–426.

7. Salter MW, Brooke RI, Merskey H. Temporomandibular pain and dysfunction syndrome: The relationship of clinical and psychological data to outcome. J Behav Med 1986;9:97–109.

8. Clark GT, Lanham F, Flack F. Treatment outcome results for consecutive TMJ clinic patients. J Craniomandib Disord 1988;2:87–95.

9. Dworkin SF, Turner JA, Mancl L, et al. A randomized clinical trial of a tailored comprehensive care treatment program for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2002;16:259–276.

10. Suvinen TI, Hanes KR, Gerschman JA, Reade PC. Psychophysical subtypes of temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1997;11:200–205.

11. Suvinen TI, Reade PC, Sunden B, Gerschman JA, Koukounas E. Temporomandibular disorders: Part II. A comparison of psychologic profiles in Australian and Finnish patients. J Orofac Pain 1997;11:147–157.

12. Turner JA, Dworkin SF, Mancl L, Huggins KH, Truelove EL. The roles of beliefs, catastrophizing, and coping in the functioning of patients with temporomandibular disorders. Pain 2001;92:41–51.

13. Epker J, Gatchel RJ, Ellis E III. A model for predicting chronic TMD: Practical application in clinical settings. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:1470–1475.

14. McCreary CP, Clark GT, Oakley ME, Flack V. Predicting response to treatment for temporomandibular disorders. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:161–169.

15. Turner JA, Dworkin SF. Screening for psychosocial risk factors in patients with chronic orofacial pain: Recent advances. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:1119–1125.

16. Gerstner GE, Clark GT, Goulet JP. Validity of a brief questionnaire in screening asymptomatic subjects from subjects with tension-type headaches or temporomandibular disorders. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;22: 235–242.

17. Melzack R. The McGill pain questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975;1:277–299.

18. Undt G, Murakami K, Clark GT, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the JPF-questionnaire for German-speaking patients with functional temporomandibular joint disorders. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006;34:226–233.

19. Beck A. Depression: Clinical, Experimental, and Theoretical aspects. New York: Harper and Row, 1967.

20. Spielberger C, Gorsuch R, Tushene R. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychology, 1970.

21. Goulet JP, Clark GT, Flack VF, Changriu L. The reproducibility of muscle and joint tenderness detection methods and maximum mandibular movement measurement for the temporomandibular system. J Orofac Pain 1998;12:17–26.

22. Goulet JP, Clark GT, Flack VF. Reproducibility of examiner performance for muscle and joint palpation in the temporomandibular system following training and calibration. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993;21:72–77.

23. Okeson JP. Long-term treatment of disk-interference disorders of the temporomandibular joint with anterior repositioning occlusal splints. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60: 611–616.

24. Agerberg G, Carlsson GE. Late results of treatment of functional disorders of the masticatory system. A follow- up by questionnaire. J Oral Rehabil 1974;1:309–316.

25. Kamisaka M, Yatani H, Kuboki T, Matsuka Y, Minakuchi H. Four-year longitudinal course of TMD symptoms in an adult population and the estimation of risk factors in relation to symptoms. J Orofac Pain 2000; 14:224–232.

26. Turk DC, Rudy TE, Sorkin BA. Neglected topics in chronic pain treatment outcome studies: Determination of success. Pain 1993;53:3–16.

27. Turk DC, Rudy TE. Neglected topics in the treatment of chronic pain patients: Relapse, noncompliance, and adherence enhancement. Pain 1991;44:5–28.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top