Evaluation of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders for the Recognition of an Anterior Disc Displacement with Reduction

The aim of this Focus Article is to review critically the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) for the recognition of an anterior disc displacement with reduction (ADDR) in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). This evaluation is based upon the experience gained through the careful analysis of mandibular movement recordings of hundreds of patients and controls with or without an ADDR. Clinically, it is a challenge to discriminate between the two most prevalent internal derangements of the TMJ: ADDR and symptomatic hypermobility. It is due to the very nature of these derangements that they both show clicking on opening and closing (reciprocal clicking), making reciprocal clicking not a distinguishing feature between these disorders. However, there is a difference in timing of their opening and closing clicks. Unfortunately, it is not feasible to use this difference in timing clinically to distinguish between the two internal derangements, because it is the amount of mouth opening at the time of the clicking which is clinically noted, not the condylar translation. Two other criteria proposed by the RDC/TMD for the recognition of an ADDR are the 5-mm difference in mouth opening at the time of the opening and closing clicks, and the detection of joint sounds on protrusion or laterotrusion in case of non- reciprocal clicking. These, however, run the risk of false-positive or negative results and therefore have no great diagnostic value. Instead, it is recommended that the elimination of clicking on protrusive opening and closing be examined in order to distinguish ADDRs from symptomatic hypermobility.

anterior disc displacement; clinical examination; mandibular movement recordings; RDC/TMD; temporomandibular joint

1. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6: 301–355.

2. De Leeuw R. Orofacial Pain. Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management. Chicago: Quintessence, 2008.

3. Stegenga B, de Bont LGM. TMJ disc derangements. In: Laskin DM, Green CS, Hylander WL (eds). TMDs: An Evidence-Based Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment. Chicago: Quintessence, 2006:125–136.

4. Könönen M, Waltimo A, Nystrom M. Does clicking in adolescence lead to painful temporomandibular joint locking? Lancet 1996;347:1080–1081.

5. Magnusson T, Egermark I, Carlsson GE. A longitudinal epidemiologic study of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders from 15 to 35 years of age. J Orofac Pain 2000;14:310–319.

6. Huddleston Slater JJR, Lobbezoo F, Chen YJ, Naeije M. A comparative study between clinical and instrumental methods for the recognition of internal derangements with a clicking sound on condylar movement. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:138–147.

7. Huddleston Slater JJR, Lobbezoo F, Van Selms MK, Naeije M. Recognition of internal derangements. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:851–854.

8. Schiffman EL, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. The revised research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Methods used to establish and validate revised Axis I diagnostic algorithms. J Orofac Pain (in press).

9. Anderson G, Gonzalez Y, Ohrbach R, et al. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Future directions. J Orofac Pain (in press).

10. Huddleston Slater JJ, Lobbezoo F, Onland-Moret NC, Naeije M. Anterior disc displacement with reduction and symptomatic hypermobility in the human temporomandibular joint: Prevalence rates and risk factors in chil- dren and teenagers. J Orofac Pain 2007;21:55–62.

11. Kalaykova S, Naeije M, Huddleston Slater JJ, Lobbezoo F. Is condylar position a predictor for functional signs of TMJ hypermobility? J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:349–355.

12. Kalaykova S, Naeije M, Lobbezoo F. Short-term time course of anterior disc displacement with reduction [abstract]. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:59.

13. Naeije M, Van der Weijden JJ, Megens CC. OKAS-3D: Optoelectronic jaw movement recording system with six degrees of freedom. Med Biol Eng Comput 1995;33: 683–688.

14. Kohno S. Analyse der Kondylenbewegung in der Sagittalebene. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1972;27:739–743.

15. Pröschel PA, Feng H, Ohkawa S, Ott R, Hofmann M. Untersuchung zur Interpretation des Bewegungsverhaltens kondylärer Punkte. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1993;48:323–326.

16. Yatabe M, Zwijnenburg A, Megens CC, Naeije M. The kinematic center: A reference for condylar movements. J Dent Res 1995;74:1644–1648.

17. Naeije M. Measurement of condylar motion: A plea for the use of the condylar kinematic centre. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:225–230.

18. Huddleston Slater JJR, Lobbezoo F, Naeije M. Mandibular movement characteristics of an anterior disc displacement with reduction. J Orofac Pain 2002;16:135–142.

19. Mauderli AP, Lundeen HC. Condylar movement record- ings for analyzing TMJ derangement. J Craniomandib Disord 1988;2:119–127.

20. Palla S, Krebs M, Gallo LM. Jaw tracking and temporomandibular joint animation. In: McNeill C (ed). Science and Practice of Occlusion. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997:365–378.

21. Koolstra JH, van Eijden TM. Dynamics of the human masticatory muscles during a jaw open-close movement. J Biomech 1997;30:883–889.

22. Huddleston Slater JJR, Visscher CM, Lobbezoo F, Naeije

M. The intra-articular distance within the TMJ during free and loaded closing movements. J Dent Res 1999;78: 1815–1820.

23. Gallo LM, Svoboda A, Palla S. Reproducibility of temporomandibular joint clicking. J Orofac Pain 2000;14: 293–302.

24. Farrar WB. Characteristics of the condylar path in internal derangements of the TMJ. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39: 319–323.

25. Dijkstra PU, de Bont LG, Stegenga B, Boering G. Temporomandibular joint mobility assessment: A comparison between four methods. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22: 439–444.

26. Naeije M. Local kinematic and anthropometric factors related to the maximum mouth opening in healthy individuals. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:534–539.