Article Data

  • Views 432
  • Dowloads 42

Original Research

Open Access

Assessment of Somatosensory Function, Pain, and Unpleasantness in Two Surrogate Models of Trigeminal Nerve Damage : A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Crossover Study

  • Rajath Sasidharan Pillai1,2,*,
  • Maria Pigg2,3
  • Thomas List2,4
  • Peter Svensson1,2,5
  • Lene Baad-Hansen1,2

1Section for Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

2 Scandinavian Center for Orofacial Neurosciences (SCON), Aarhus, Denmark

3Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

4Department of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

5Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.2423 Vol.34,Issue 1,March 2020 pp.92-107

Submitted: 07 December 2018 Accepted: 11 March 2019

Published: 30 March 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): Rajath Sasidharan Pillai E-mail: raj.pillai@dent.au.dk

Abstract

Aims: To assess the pain and/or unpleasantness and the somatosensory changes caused by two experimental models of trigeminal nerve damage (topical application of capsaicin and local anesthetics) in healthy participants using extensive evaluation tools. Methods: This double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study included 20 healthy adult participants who underwent three separate sessions of testing. In each session, the psychophysical quantitative sensory testing (QST) and the electrophysiologic electrically evoked trigeminal "nociceptive-specific" blink reflex (nBR) investigations were performed at baseline. Following a 15-minute topical application of 0.1% capsaicin, 5% EMLA, or Vaseline (placebo) agents, the maximum numeric rating scale pain and unpleasantness scores were recorded. Additionally, qualitative sensory testing and somatosensory mapping were performed. The QST and nBR investigations were repeated immediately after each application. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: Capsaicin application was associated with significantly higher pain and unpleasantness scores when compared to EMLA and Vaseline (P < .001), with varied bidirectional somatosensory changes among the participants and significant loss of thermosensory function (P < .030). EMLA application induced loss of thermal and mechanical somatosensory function (P < .030) and a significant reduction in electrically evoked pain scores on nBR investigation (P < .001). No significant changes were seen in the electrophysiologic component of the nBR after any of the applications (P = .922). Conclusion: Topical capsaicin and EMLA application mimicked certain aspects of somatosensory changes seen in trigeminal nerve damage patients and may be used as surrogate models of such changes.


Keywords

blink reflex; capsaicin; EMLA; quantitative sensory testing; trigeminal nerve damage


Cite and Share

Rajath Sasidharan Pillai,Maria Pigg,Thomas List,Peter Svensson,Lene Baad-Hansen. Assessment of Somatosensory Function, Pain, and Unpleasantness in Two Surrogate Models of Trigeminal Nerve Damage : A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Crossover Study. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2020. 34(1);92-107.

References

1. Renton T, Yilmaz Z. Profiling of patients presenting with posttraumatic neuropathy of the trigeminal nerve. J Orofac Pain 2011;25:333–344.

2. Peñarrocha M, Cervelló MA, Martí E, Bagán JV. Trigeminal neuropathy. Oral Dis 2007;13:141–150.

3. Baad-Hansen L, Jensen TS, Svensson P. A human model of intraoral pain and heat hyperalgesia. J Orofac Pain 2003; 17:333–340.

4. Forssell H, Jääskeläinen S, List T, Svensson P, Baad-Hansen L. An update on pathophysiological mechanisms related to idiopathic orofacial pain conditions with implications for management. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42:300–322.

5. Baad-Hansen L, List T, Kaube H, Jensen TS, Svensson P. Blink reflexes in patients with atypical odontalgia and matched healthy controls. Exp Brain Res 2006;172:498–506.

6. Smith JG, Elias LA, Yilmaz Z, et al. The psychosocial and affective burden of posttraumatic neuropathy following injuries to the trigeminal nerve. J Orofac Pain 2013;27:293–303.

7. Pogrel MA, Jergensen R, Burgon E, Hulme D. Long-term outcome of trigeminal nerve injuries related to dental treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:2284–2288.

8. Fields HL. Pain: An unpleasant topic. Pain 1999;(suppl 6): s61–s69.

9. Enax-Krumova EK, Pohl S, Westermann A, Maier C. Ipsilateral and contralateral sensory changes in healthy subjects after experimentally induced concomitant sensitization and hypoesthesia. BMC Neurol 2017;17:60.

10. Gazerani P, Andersen OK, Arendt-Nielsen L. A human experimental capsaicin model for trigeminal sensitization. Gender-specific differences. Pain 2005;118:155–163.

11. Pigg M, Baad-Hansen L, Svensson P, Drangsholt M, List T. Reliability of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST). Pain 2010;148:220–226.

12. Rolke R, Baron R, Maier C, et al. Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Standardized protocol and reference values. Pain 2006;123:231–243.

13. Svensson P, Baad-Hansen L, Pigg M, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for assessment of somatosensory function in orofacial pain conditions—A taskforce report. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:366–394.

14. Baad-Hansen L, Pigg M, Ivanovic SE, et al. Chairside intraoral qualitative somatosensory testing: Reliability and comparison between patients with atypical odontalgia and healthy con-trols. J Orofac Pain 2013;27:165–170.

15. Kaube H, Katsarava Z, Käufer T, Diener H, Ellrich J. A new method to increase nociception specificity of the human blink reflex. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111:413–416.

16. Perchet C, Frot M, Charmarty A, et al. Do we activate specifically somatosensory thin fibres with the concentric planar electrode? A scalp and intracranial EEG study. Pain 2012;153:1244–1252.

17. Rehberg B, Baars JH, Kotsch J, Koppe P, von Dincklage F. Comparison of trigeminal and spinal modulation of pain and nociception. Int J Neurosci 2012;122:298–304.

18. Zhou P, Chen Y, Zhang J, Wang K, Svensson P. Quantitative sensory testing for assessment of somatosensory function in human oral mucosa: A review. Acta Odontol Scand 2018;76:13–20.

19. Schmelz M. Translating nociceptive processing into human pain models. Exp Brain Res 2009;196:173–178.

20. Agbaje J, De Laat A, Constantinus P, Svensson P, Baad-Hansen L. Agreement between quantitative and qualitative sensory testing of changes in oro-facial somatosensory sensitivity. J Oral Rehabil 2017;44:30–42.

21. Rowbotham MC, Nothaft W, Duan WR, et al. Oral and cutaneous thermosensory profile of selective TRPV1 inhibition by ABT-102 in a randomized healthy volunteer trial. Pain 2011;152:1192–1200.

22. Sikand P, Shimada SG, Green BG, LaMotte RH. Sensory responses to injection and punctate application of capsaicin and histamine to the skin. Pain 2011;152:2485–2494.

23. Petersen KL, Rowbotham MC. A new human experimental pain model: The heat/capsaicin sensitization model. Neuroreport 1999;10:1511–1516.

24. Svensson P, Bjerring P, Arendt-Nielsen L, Kaaber S. Variability of argon laser-induced sensory and pain thresholds on human oral mucosa and skin. Anesth Prog 1991;38:79–83.

25. Naganawa T, Baad-Hansen L, Ando T, Svensson P. Influence of topical application of capsaicin, menthol and local anesthetics on intraoral somatosensory sensitivity in healthy subjects: Temporal and spatial aspects. Exp Brain Res 2015; 233:1189–1199.

26. Nielsen JC, Arendt-Nielsen L, Bjerring P, Svensson P. The analgesic effect of EMLA cream on facial skin. Quantitative evaluation using argon laser stimulation. Acta Derm Venereol 1992;72:281–284.

27. de C Williams AC, Davies HT, Chadury Y. Simple pain rating scales hide complex idiosyncratic meanings. Pain 2000;85:457–463.

28. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975;1:277–299.

29. Gazerani P, Pedersen NS, Staahl C, Drewes AM, Arendt-Nielsen L. Subcutaneous Botulinum toxin type A reduces capsaicin-induced trigeminal pain and vasomotor reactions in human skin. Pain 2009;141:60–69.

30. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 2012;9:671–675.

31. Baad-Hansen L, List T, Jensen TS, Leijon G, Svensson P. Blink reflexes in patients with atypical odontalgia. J Orofac Pain 2005;19:239–247.

32. Costa YM, Baad-Hansen L, Bonjardim LR, Conti PCR, Svensson P. Reliability of the nociceptive blink reflex evoked by electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve in humans. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:2453–2463.

33. von Dincklage F, Koppe P, Kotsch J, Baars JH, Rehberg B. Investigation of threshold and magnitude criteria of the nociceptive blink reflex. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121:945–949.

34. Katsarava Z, Ellrich J, Diener HC, Kaube H. Optimized stimulation and recording parameters of human ‘nociception specific’ blink reflex recordings. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113:1932–1936.

35. Ellrich J, Treede RD. Characterization of blink reflex interneurons by activation of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls in man. Brain Res 1998;803:161–168.

36. Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health 1994;11:3–11.

37. Ohrbach R. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Assessment Instruments. https://ubwp.buffalo. edu/rdc-tmdinternational/. Accessed 9 May, 2019.

38. Bartlett MS. The use of transformations. Biometrics 1947;3: 39–52.

39. Baad-Hansen L, Pigg M, Ivanovic SE, et al. Intraoral somato-sensory abnormalities in patients with atypical odontalgia—A controlled multicenter quantitative sensory testing study. Pain 2013;154:1287–1294.

40. Lu S, Baad-Hansen L, List T, Zhang Z, Svensson P. Somatosensory profiling of intraoral capsaicin and menthol in healthy subjects. Eur J Oral Sci 2013;121:29–35.

41. Rolke R, Magerl W, Campbell KA, et al. Quantitative sensory testing: A comprehensive protocol for clinical trials. Eur J Pain 2006;10:77–88.

42. Krumova EK, Westermann A, Maier C. Quantitative sensory testing: A diagnostic tool for painful neuropathy. Future Neurol 2010;5:721–733.

43. Maier C, Baron R, Tölle TR, et al. Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Somatosensory abnormalities in 1236 patients with different neuropathic pain syndromes. Pain 2010;150:439–450.

44. Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing dat, ed 2. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2002.

45. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: Recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:6–27.

46.

Frot M, Feine JS, Bushnell MC. Sex differences in pain perception and anxiety. A psychophysical study with topical capsaicin. Pain 2004;108:230–236.

47. Baumann TK, Simone DA, Shain CN, LaMotte RH. Neurogenic hyperalgesia: The search for the primary cutaneous afferent fibers that contribute to capsaicin-induced pain and hyperalgesia. J Neurophysiol 1991;66:212–227.

48. Kilo S, Schmelz M, Koltzenburg M, Handwerker HO. Different patterns of hyperalgesia induced by experimental inflammation in human skin. Brain 1994;117:385–396.

49. Koltzenburg M, Lundberg LE, Torebjörk HE. Dynamic and static components of mechanical hyperalgesia in human hairy skin. Pain 1992;51:207–219.

50. LaMotte RH, Shain CN, Simone DA, Tsai EF. Neurogenic hyperalgesia: Psychophysical studies of underlying mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 1991;66:190–211.

51. Mohammadian P, Andersen OK, Arendt-Nielsen L. Correlation between local vascular and sensory changes following tissue inflammation induced by repetitive application of topical cap-saicin. Brain Res 1998;792:1–9.

52. Simone DA, Sorkin LS, Oh U, et al. Neurogenic hyperalgesia: Central neural correlates in responses of spinothalamic tract neurons. J Neurophysiol 1991;66:228–246.

53. Carpenter SE, Lynn B. Vascular and sensory responses of human skin to mild injury after topical treatment with capsaicin. Br J Pharmacol 1981;73:755–758.

54. Simone DA, Ochoa J. Early and late effects of prolonged topical capsaicin on cutaneous sensibility and neurogenic vasodilatation in humans. Pain 1991;47:285–294.

55. Caterina MJ, Schumacher MA, Tominaga M, Rosen TA, Levine JD, Julius D. The capsaicin receptor: A heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway. Nature 1997;389:816–824.

56. Callsen MG, Moller AT, Sorensen K, Jensen TS, Finnerup NB. Cold hyposensitivity after topical application of capsaicin in humans. Exp Brain Res 2008;191:447–452.

57. Okazawa M, Inoue W, Hori A, Hosokawa H, Matsumura K, Kobayashi S. Noxious heat receptors present in coldsensory cells in rats. Neurosci Lett 2004;359:33–36.

58. Kobayashi K, Fukuoka T, Obata K, et al. Distinct expression of TRPM8, TRPA1, and TRPV1 mRNAs in rat primary afferent neurons with aδ/c-fibers and colocalization with trk receptors. J Comp Neurol 2005;493:596–606.

59. Linte RM, Ciobanu C, Reid G, Babes A. Desensitization of cold- and menthol-sensitive rat dorsal root ganglion neurones by inflammatory mediators. Exp Brain Res 2007;178:89–98.

60. Gierthmühlen J, Maier C, Baron R, et al. Sensory signs in complex regional pain syndrome and peripheral nerve injury. Pain 2012;153:765–774.

61. Kothari SF, Baad-Hansen L, Oono Y, Svensson P. Somatosensory assessment and conditioned pain modulation in temporomandibular disorders pain patients. Pain 2015; 156:2545–2555.

62. Pappagallo M, Oaklander AL, Quatrano-Piacentini AL, Clark MR, Raja SN. Heterogenous patterns of sensory dysfunction in postherpetic neuralgia suggest multiple pathophysiologic mechanisms. Anesthesiology 2000;92:691–698.

63. Jääskeläinen SK. Pathophysiology of primary burning mouth syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2012;123:71–77.

64. de Tommaso M, Sardaro M, Pecoraro C, et al. Effects of the remote C fibres stimulation induced by capsaicin on the blink reflex in chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 2007;27:881–890.

65. Arendt-Nielsen L, Bjerring P. Laser-induced pain for evaluation of local analgesia: A comparison of topical application (EMLA) and local injection (lidocaine). Anesth Analg 1988;67:115–123.

66. Svensson P, Bjerring P, Arendt-Nielsen L, Kaaber S. Hypoalgesic effect of EMLA and lidocaine gel applied on human oral mucosa: Quantitative evaluationby sensory and pain thresholds to argon laser stimulation. Anesth Prog 1992; 39:4–8.

67. Bjerring P, Arendt-Nielsen L. Depth and duration of skin an-algesia to needle insertion after topical application of EMLA cream. Br J Anaesth 1990;64:173–177.

68. Ellrich J, Katsarava Z, Przywara S, Kaube H. Is the R3 component of the human blink reflex nociceptive in origin? Pain 2001;91:389–395.

69. Komiyama O, Wang K, Svensson P, Arendt-Nielsen L, De Laat A. Correlation and cluster analysis of sensory, pain, and reflex thresholds to various stimulus modalities in symptomfree subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:2016–2022.

70. Janal MN, Glusman M, Kuhl JP, Clark WC. On the absence of correlation between responses to noxious heat, cold, electrical and ischemie stimulation. Pain 1994;58:403–411.

71. Neziri AY, Curatolo M, Nüesch E, et al. Factor analysis of responses to thermal, electrical, and mechanical painful stimuli supports the importance of multi-modal pain assessment. Pain 2011;152:1146–1155.



Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top