Article Data

  • Views 385
  • Dowloads 63

Original Research

Open Access

Can the Measurement of Jaw-Opening Forces Assist in the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders?

  • Jithendra Ratnayake1,*,
  • Guangzhao Guan1
  • Ajith Polonowita1
  • Kai Chun Li1
  • Andrew R. Gray2
  • J. Neil Waddell1
  • Carolina Loch1
  • Paul A. Brunton1

1Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

2Biostatistics Unit Office of the Dean, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.2587 Vol.34,Issue 3,September 2020 pp.199-205

Submitted: 15 August 2019 Accepted: 26 November 2019

Published: 30 September 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): Jithendra Ratnayake E-mail: jithendra.ratnayake@otago.ac.nz

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the effectiveness of a novel jaw-opening–force measuring device as a screening tool to aid in the diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Methods: Symptomatic TMD patients (n = 58) and control TMD-free participants (n = 56) were screened by an oral medicine specialist according to the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD). TMD patients were divided into three subcategories based on TMD symptoms (myofascial pain, disc displacement, and both combined). Jaw-opening forces were measured in both groups with an adjustable head device connected to a 1,000-N–load cell. Seven attempts were recorded at 10-second intervals by a data-capturing system. The geometric mean force values were obtained after discarding the first and last attempts. Results: TMD-free participants had greater jaw-opening forces than TMD patients both without and with adjustments for age, sex, height, and weight (both P < .001). The geometric mean ± standard deviation values for TMD patients were 18.5 ± 1.62 N and 47.7 ± 1.53 N for TMD-free participants. Differences in jaw-opening forces among the three TMD subcategories were not statistically significant; however, patients with disc displacement (23.7 ± 1.46 N) had greater jaw forces than patients with myofascial pain (17.0 ± 1.74 N) and both myofascial pain and disc displacement (17.0 ± 1.56 N). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that differences in jaw-opening forces could be used as a diagnostic tool for TMD. Future studies should explore the potential of this device to measure improvement in jaw-opening forces following TMD treatment.

Keywords

diagnostic tool; jaw-opening forces; myofascial pain; temporomandibular disorders; temporomandibular joint

Cite and Share

Jithendra Ratnayake,Guangzhao Guan,Ajith Polonowita,Kai Chun Li,Andrew R. Gray,J. Neil Waddell,Carolina Loch,Paul A. Brunton. Can the Measurement of Jaw-Opening Forces Assist in the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders?. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2020. 34(3);199-205.

References

1. Tjakkes GH, Reinders JJ, Tenvergert EM, Stegenga B. TMD pain: The effect on health related quality of life and the influence of pain duration. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010;8:46.

2. Bitiniene D, Zamaliauskiene R, Kubilius R, Leketas M, Gailius T, Smirnovaite K. Quality of life in patients with temporo-mandibular disorders. A systematic review. Stomatologija 2018;20:3–9.

3. Fan WY, Tiang N, Broadbent JM, Thomson WM. Occurrence, associations, and impacts of nocturnal parafunction, daytime parafunction, and temporomandibular symptoms in 38-year-old individuals. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2019;33:254–259.

4. Mense S. The pathogenesis of muscle pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2003;7:419–425.

5. Maixner W, Diatchenko L, Dubner R, et al. Orofacial pain prospective evaluation and risk assessment study—The OPPERA study. J Pain 2011;12(11 suppl):T4–T11.e1–e2.

6. Smith SB, Maixner DW, Greenspan JD, et al. Potential genetic risk factors for chronic TMD: Genetic associations from the OPPERA case control study. J Pain 2011;12(11 suppl):T92–T101.

7. Slade GD, Ohrbach R, Greenspan JD, et al. Painful temporo-mandibular disorder: Decade of discovery from OPPERA studies. J Dent Res 2016;95:1084–1092.

8. Harper DE, Schrepf A, Clauw DJ. Pain mechanisms and centralized pain in temporomandibular disorders. J Dent Res 2016;95:1102–1108.

9. McNeill C. Management of temporomandibular disorders: Concepts and controversies. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77: 510–522.

10. Okeson JP. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion, ed 7. St Louis: Mosby, 2014.

11. Polonowita AD, Thomson WM, Thorburn DN. Clinical efficacy of a simplified approach to managing chronic temporomandibular disorders: Evidence from a 1-year case series. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2019;128:227–234.

12. Koolstra JH, van Eijden TM. Biomechanical analysis of jaw-closing movements. J Dent Res 1995;74:1564–1570.

13. Pruim GJ, de Jongh HJ, Ten Bosch JJ. Forces acting on the mandible during bilateral static bite at different bite force levels.J Biomech 1980;13:755–763.

14. Waltimo A, Könönen M. A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adults. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101:171–175.

15. de Abreu RA, Pereira MD, Furtado F, Prado GP, Mestriner W, Jr, Ferreira LM. Masticatory efficiency and bite force in individuals with normal occlusion. Arch Oral Biol. 2014;59:1065–1074.

16. Sharkey P, Boyle DK, Orchardson R, McGowan DA. Jaw opening forces in human subjects. Br Dent J 1984;156:89–92.

17. Bolt KJ, Orchardson R. Relationship between mouth-opening force and facial skeletal dimensions in human females. Arch Oral Biol 1986;31:789–793.

18. Hara K, Tohara H, Wada S, Iida T, Ueda K, Ansai T. Jaw-opening force test to screen for dysphagia: preliminary results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:867–874.

19. Brunton PA, Loch C, Waddell JN, Bodansky HJ, Hall R, Gray A. Estimation of jaw-opening forces in adults. Orthod Craniofac Res 2018;21:57–62.

20. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: Recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:6–27.

21. Gray RJ, Davies SJ, Quayle AA. A clinical approach to tem-poromandibular disorders. 1. Classification and functional anatomy. Br Dent J 1994;176:429–435.

22. Gray R, Al-Ani Z. Temporomandibular Disorders: A Problem-Based Approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.

23. Greene CS. The etiology of temporomandibular disorders: Implications for treatment. J Orofac Pain 2001;15:93–105.

24. Slade GD, Fillingim RB, Sanders AE, et al. Summary of findings from the OPPERA prospective cohort study of incidence of first-onset temporomandibular disorder: Implications and future directions. J Pain 2013;14(12 suppl):T116–T124.

25. Bagis B, Ayaz EA, Turgut S, Durkan R, Özcan M. Gender difference in prevalence of signs and symptoms of temporo-mandibular joint disorders: A retrospective study on 243 consecutive patients. Int J Med Sci 2012;9:539–544.

26. Manfredini D, Chiappe G, Bosco M. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis I diagnoses in an Italian patient population. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:551–558.

27. Bayat M, Abbasi AJ, Noorbala AA, Mohebbi SZ, Moharrami M, Yekaninejad MS. Oral health–related quality of life in patients with temporomandibular disorders: A case-control study considering psychological aspects. Int J Dent Hyg 2018;16:165–170.

28. John MT, Reissmann DR, Schierz O, Wassell RW. Oral health-related quality of life in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2007;21:46–54.

29. Magnusson T, Egermarki I, Carlsson GE. A prospective investigation over two decades on signs and symptoms of tem-poromandibular disorders and associated variables. A final summary. Acta Odontol Scand 2005;63:99–109.

30. Kohno S, Matsuyama T, Medina RU, Arai Y. Functional-rhythmical coupling of head and mandibular movements. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:161–167.

31. Muto T, Kanazawa M. Positional change of the hyoid bone at maximal mouth opening. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;77:451–455.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top