Experiences and Outcomes of Attending a Facial Pain Management Program: A Qualitative Study

Aims: To understand the experiences of patients diagnosed with chronic facial pain (CFP) who attended a specialist facial pain management program (PMP); specifically, to explore how they experienced attending the facial PMP itself and how they felt it impacted their management of CFP. Methods: Qualitative methodology and focus groups were used to gather patients’ views and experiences of attending a facial PMP. Two focus groups were conducted for patients who had all completed the facial PMP. Discussions were recorded and transcribed. Data were then analyzed using thematic analysis to establish key themes relating to participants’ experiences of the facial PMP. Results: Thematic analysis identified three main themes, with numerous subthemes within them. The theme “psychologic change” had subthemes of self-compassion, acceptance, and reflection. The theme “behavioral change” contained subthemes of re-engagement with valued activity, medication, and communication. The theme “structure and process” contained subthemes of concentration, need for one-on-one time with the clinician, meeting others, and not enough time (clinical and nonclinical). Conclusion: Facial PMPs may provide a valuable treatment to support long-term coping and adaptation for patients with CFP. Positive changes to coping include both psychologic and behavioral elements. Further research is necessary to clarify how group-based facial PMPs should be structured and delivered.

chronic facial pain; chronic pain; focus groups; pain management; pain management programme; qualitative; thematic analysis

1. Macfarlane TV, Beasley M, Macfarlane GJ. Self-reported facial pain in UK Biobank Study: Prevalence and associated factors. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2014;5:e2.

2. Zakrzewska JM. Differential diagnosis of facial pain and guidelines for management. Br J Anaesth 2013;111:95–104.

3. Vickers ER, Boocock H. Chronic orofacial pain is associated with psychological morbidity and negative personality changes: A com-parison to the general population. Aust Dent J 2005;50:21–30.

4. Williams AC, Eccleston C, Morley S. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:CD007407.

5. Peters S, Goldthorpe J, McElroy C, et al. Managing chronic orofacial pain: A qualitative study of patients’, doctors’, and dentists’ experiences. Br J Health Psychol 2015;20:777–791.

6. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

7. Sharma S, Breckons M, Brönnimann Lambelet B, et al. Challenges in the clinical implementation of a biopsychosocial model for assessment and management of orofacial pain. J Oral Rehabil 2020;47:87–100.

8. Aggarwal A, Lovell K, Peters S, Javidi H, Joughin A, Goldthorp J. Psychosocial interventions for the management of chronicorofa-cial pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(11):CD008456.

9. Goldthorpe J, Peters S, Lovell K, McGowan L, Aggarwal V. ‘I just wanted someone to tell me it wasn’t all in my mind and do something for me’: Qualitative exploration of acceptability of a CBT based intervention to manage chronic orofacial pain. Br Dent J 2016;220:459–463.

10. British Pain Society. Guidelines for Pain Management Programmes for Adults. An evidence-based review prepared on behalf of the British Pain Society. November 2013.[https://www.britishpainso-ciety.org/static/uploads/resources/files/pmp2013_main_FINAL_ v6.pdf. Accessed 17 May, 2021.

11. Morley S, Eccleston C, Williams A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache. Pain 1999;80:1–13.

12. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation, 1996.

13. Sullivan M, Bishop S, Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995;7:524–532.

14. Nicholas MK. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: Taking pain into account. Eur J Pain 2007;11:153–163.

15. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, ed 4. Ottawa: CAOT Publications, 2005.

16. McCracken LM, Vowles KE, Eccleston C. Acceptance of chronic pain: Component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain 2004;107:159–166.

17. Puchta C, Potter J. Focus Group Practice. London: Sage, 2004.

18. Pini B. Focus groups, feminist research and farm women: Opportunities for empowerment in rural social research. J Rural Stud 2002;18:339–351.

19. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101.

20. Kidd P, Parshall MB. Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qual Health Res 2000;10:293–308.

21. McCracken LM, Eccleston C. Coping or acceptance: What to do about chronic pain? Pain 2003;105:197–204.

22. Purdie F, Morley S. Compassion and chronic pain. Pain 2016;157:2625–2627.

23. Hayes SK, Strosahl K, Wilson KG. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: The Process and Practice of Mindful Change, ed 2. New York: Guilford, 2016.

24. Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage, 2009.