Expectations and Experiences of Internet-Based Therapy for Adolescents with TMD Pain

Aims: To investigate expectations and experiences of internet-based therapy (IBT) in adolescents with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain. Methods: Seven adolescents were strategically selected for this study. All patients had received IBT for their TMD pain in a previous randomized controlled trial. One-on-one interviews were conducted in a nonclinical setting. The interviews were semi-structured, following an interview guide with six domains. The recorded interviews were transcribed, and a qualitative inductive content analysis was then performed. Results: Content analysis indicated that the expectations of the adolescents and their experiences of IBT as a treatment for TMD pain can be understood in light of three main categories: (1) To become better; (2) An ambivalent experience; and (3) A personal challenge. The adolescents expressed expectations of less TMD pain after treatment, but also of improvement in general well-being and everyday life. Although their experiences of IBT varied, adolescents described having mixed feelings about treatment and feeling that it was personally challenging. Conclusion: Gained understanding of expectations and experiences is a necessary basis for revising the IBT program to meet the demands of adolescents and to improve treatment adherence. Furthermore, the content of the three categories clarifies the values of adolescents, and this understanding can in turn contribute to the development of new patient-centered treatment programs.

1. Bor W, Dean AJ, Najman J, Hayatbakhsh R. Are child and adolescent mental health problems increasing in the 21st century?A systematic review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2014;48:606–616.

2. Sweden Public Health Agency. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC). WHO: 2018. Report No.: 18065.

3. Sweden Public Health Agency. Why have multiple health complaints increased among children and adolescents in Sweden? Development between 1985 and 2014. WHO: 2018. Report No.: 18023–1.

4. Durbeej N, Sörman K, Norén Selinus E, et al. Trends in childhood and adolescent internalizing symptoms: Results from Swedish population based twin cohorts. BMC Psychol 2019;7:50.

5. Østerås B, Sigmundsson H, Haga M. Pain is prevalent among adolescents and equally related to stress across genders. Scand J Pain 2016;12:100–107.

6. Alfven G, Grillner S, Andersson E. Review of childhood pain highlights the role of negative stress. Acta Paediatr 2019;108:2148–2156.

7. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006;10:287–333.

8. Brattberg G, Thorslund M, Wikman A. The prevalence of pain in a general population. The results of a postal survey in a county of Sweden. Pain 1989;37:215–222.

9. Nilsson IM, List T, Drangsholt M. Prevalence of temporoman-dibular pain and subsequent dental treatment in Swedish adolescents. J Orofac Pain 2005;19:144–150.

10. List T, Wahlund K, Wenneberg B, Dworkin SF. TMD in children and adolescents: Prevalence of pain, gender differences, and perceived treatment need. J Orofac Pain 1999;13:9–20.

11. Nilsson IM, List T, Drangsholt M. Incidence and temporal patterns of temporomandibular disorder pain among Swedish adolescents. J Orofac Pain 2007;21:127–132.

12. Nilsson IM, Drangsholt M, List T. Impact of temporomandibular disorder pain in adolescents: Differences by age and gender. J Orofac Pain 2009;23:115–122.

13. Nilsson IM, List T, Willman A. Adolescents with temporoman-dibular disorder pain—The living with TMD pain phenomenon. J Orofac Pain 2011;25:107–116.

14. LeResche L, Mancl LA, Drangsholt MT, Huang G, Von Korff M. Predictors of onset of facial pain and temporomandibular disorders in early adolescence. Pain 2007;129:269–278.

15. Von Korff M, Resche LL, Dworkin SF. First onset of common pain symptoms: A prospective study of depression as a risk factor. Pain 1993;55:251–258.

16. Grossi ML, Goldberg MB, Locker D, Tenenbaum HC. Reduced neuropsychologic measures as predictors of treatment out-come in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2001;15:329–339.

17. John MT, Miglioretti DL, LeResche L, Von Korff M, Critchlow CW. Widespread pain as a risk factor for dysfunctional tem-poromandibular disorder pain. Pain 2003;102:257–263.

18. Brattberg G. Do pain problems in young school children persist into early adulthood? A 13-year follow-up. Eur J Pain 2004;8:187–199.

19. Nilsson IM, List T. Does adolescent self-reported TMD pain persist into early adulthood? A longitudinal study. Acta Odontol Scand 2020;78:377–383.

20. Wahlund K, List T, Larsson B. Treatment of temporomandibular disorders among adolescents: A comparison between occlu-sal appliance, relaxation training, and brief information. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;61:203–211.

21. Litt MD, Shafer DM, Kreutzer DL. Brief cognitive-behavioral treatment for TMD pain: Long-term outcomes and moderators of treatment. Pain 2010;151:110–116.

22. Wahlund K, Nilsson IM, Larsson B. Treating temporoman-dibular disorders in adolescents: A randomized, controlled, sequential comparison of relaxation training and occlusal ap-pliance therapy. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2015;29:41–50.

23. Wahlund K, Larsson B. Long-term treatment outcome for ad-olescents with temporomandibular pain. Acta Odontol Scand 2018;76:153–160.

24. Trautmann E, Kröner-Herwig B. A randomized controlled trial of Internet-based self-help training for recurrent headache in childhood and adolescence. Behav Res Ther 2010;48:28–37.

25. Stinson JN, Luca NJ, Jibb LA. Assessment and management of pain in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pain Res Manag 2012;17:391–396.

26. Palermo TM, Law EF, Fales J, Bromberg MH, Jessen-Fiddick T, Tai G. Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral treatment for adolescents with chronic pain and their parents: A randomized controlled multicenter trial. Pain 2016;157:174–185.

27. Lindfors E, Hedman E, Magnusson T, Ernberg M, Gabre P. Patient experiences of therapeutic jaw exercises in the treatment of masticatory myofascial pain: A qualitative study. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2017;31:46–54.

28. Nicholas MK, Asghari A, Sharpe L, et al. Cognitive exposure versus avoidance in patients with chronic pain: Adherence matters. Eur J Pain 2014;18:424–437.

29. Voerman JS, Remerie S, Westendorp T, et al. Effects of a guided Internet-delivered self-help intervention for adolescents with chronic pain. J Pain 2015;16:1115–1126.

30. Aggarwal VR, Fu Y, Main CJ, Wu J. The effectiveness of self-management interventions in adults with chronic orofacial pain: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Eur J Pain 2019;23:849–865.

31. Burnard P. A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Educ Today 1991;11:461–466.

32. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2008;62:107–115.

33. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: Recommendations of the international RDC/TMD consortium network* and orofacial pain special in-terest group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:6–27.

34. Nilsson IM, Willman A. Treatment seeking and self-construct-ed explanations of pain and pain management strategies among adolescents with temporomandibular disorder pain. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2016;30:127–133.

35. Stinson JN, Lalloo C, Harris L, et al. iCanCope with pain: User-centred design of a web- and mobile-based self-management program for youth with chronic pain based on identified health care needs. Pain Res Manag 2014;19:257–265.

36. Constantino MJ, Arnkoff DB, Glass CR, Ametrano RM, Smith JZ. Expectations. J Clin Psychol 2011;67:184–192.

37. Crushell E, Rowland M, Doherty M, et al. Importance of parental conceptual model of illness in severe recurrent abdominal pain. Pediatrics 2003;112:1368–1372.

38. Guite JW, Kim S, Chen CP, et al. Pain beliefs and readiness to change among adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain and their parents before an initial pain clinic evaluation. Clin J Pain 2014;30:27–35.

39. Risling T, Martinez J, Young J, Thorp-Froslie N. Evaluating pa-tient empowerment in association with ehealth technology: Scoping review. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e329.

40. Logan DE, Conroy C, Sieberg CB, Simons LE. Changes in willingness to self-manage pain among children and adolescents and their parents enrolled in an intensive interdisciplinary pediatric pain treatment program. Pain 2012;153:1863–1870.

41. Lenhard F, Vigerland S, Engberg H, Hallberg A, Thermaenius H, Serlachius E. “On my own, but not alone”—Adolescents’ experiences of internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. PLoS One 2016;11:e0164311.

42. Kanstrup M, Jordan A, Kemani MK. Adolescent and parent experiences of acceptance and commitment therapy for pediatric chronic pain: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Children (Basel) 2019;6:101.

43. Wilhelmsen M, Lillevoll K, Risør MB, et al. Motivation to persist with internet-based cognitive behavioural treatment using blended care: A qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry 2013;13:296.

44. Cormier S, Lavigne GL, Choinière M, Rainville P. Expectations predict chronic pain treatment outcomes. Pain 2016;157:329–338.

45. Goldstein AP. Patient’s expectancies and non-specific therapy as a basis for (un) spontaneous remission. J Clin Psychol 1960;16:399–403.

46. Noble LM, Douglas BC, Newman SP. What do patients expect of psychiatric services? A systematic and critical review of empirical studies. Soc Sci Med 2001;52:985–998.

47. Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: A systematic review. Lancet 2001;357:757–762.

48. Goossens ME, Vlaeyen JW, Hidding A, Kole-Snijders A, Evers SM. Treatment expectancy affects the outcome of cognitive-behavioral interventions in chronic pain. Clin J Pain 2005;21:18–26.

49. Horvath P. Treatment expectancy as a function of the amount of information presented in therapeutic rationales. J Clin Psychol 1990;46:636–642.

50. Bensing JM, Verheul W. The silent healer: The role of communication in placebo effects. Patient Educ Couns 2010;80:293–299.

51. Finniss DG, Benedetti F. Mechanisms of the placebo response and their impact on clinical trials and clinical practice. Pain 2005;114:3–6.

52. Polit DF, Beck CT. Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. Int J Nurs Stud 2010;47:1451–1458.

53. Firestone WA. Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research. Educ Res 1993;22:16–23.

54. Misco T. The frustrations of reader generalizability and grounded theory: Alternative considerations for transferability. J Res Pract 2007;3:1–11.

55. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry, ed 1. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1985.

56. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, ed 3. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 2001.

57. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:105–112.

58. Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res 1999;34:1189–1208.