Abnormal functional hubs in migraine patients: a resting-state MRI analysis about voxel-wise degree centrality

The purpose was to explore the spatial centrality of the whole brain functional network related to migraine and to investigate the potential functional hubs associated with migraine. 32 migraine patients and 55 healthy controls were recruited and they received resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging voluntarily. Voxel-wise Degree Centrality (DC) was measured across the whole brain, and group differences in DC were compared. False Discovery Rate and permutation test (5000 times) were used for multiple comparisons. Finally, significant differences in functional connectivity (FC) between seeds and other brain regions were further researched by the seed-based approach. The correlation analyses between the changes in the brain function and clinical features were also performed. The results showed that, compared to healthy controls, migraine patients exhibited significantly increased DC in the left anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), slightly increased DC in the right ACC and the right medial superior frontal gyrus (SFG). No significant correlation was found between DC and clinical variables. The seed-based analyses showed that migraine patients showed increased FC between the right SFG and left ACC, decreased FC between the left ACC and left superior temporal gyrus (STG). FC value of the right SFG was positively correlated with the score of migraine-specific quality-of-life questionnaire about role in function-preventive in migraine patients. According to relatively changed DC, we found that migraine patients exhibited specific abnormal intrinsic functional hubs. These findings expand our understanding of functional characteristics of migraine, and may provide new insights into understanding the dysfunction and pathophysiology of migraine patients.

Migraine; Pain; Degree centrality; Functional connectivity; Resting-state fMRI

[1] Headache classification committee of the international headache society (IHS) the international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018; 38: 1–211.

[2] Buse DC, Manack A, Serrano D, Turkel C, Lipton RB. Sociodemographic and comorbidity profiles of chronic migraine and episodic migraine sufferers. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2010; 81: 428–432.

[3] Stovner LJ, Nichols E, Steiner TJ, Abd-Allah F, Abdelalim A, Al-Raddadi RM, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Neurology. 2018; 17: 954–976.

[4] Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ, Vos T, Jensen R, Katsarava Z. Migraine is first cause of disability in under 50s: will health politicians now take notice? The Journal of Headache and Pain. 2018; 19: 17.

[5] Linde M, Gustavsson A, Stovner LJ, Steiner TJ, Barré J, Katsarava Z, et al. The cost of headache disorders in Europe: the Eurolight project. European Journal of Neurology. 2012; 19: 703–711.

[6] Hu X H, Markson L E, Lipton R B, Stewart W F, Berger M L. Burden of migraine in the United States: disability and economic costs. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1999; 159: 813–818.

[7] Raimondo L, Oliveira Ĺ A F, Heij J, Priovoulos N, Kundu P, Leoni R F, et al. Advances in resting state fMRI acquisitions for functional connectomics. Neuroimage. 2021; 243: 118503.

[8] Campbell OL, Weber AM. Monofractal analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging: an introductory review. Human Brain Mapping. 2022; 43: 2693–2706.

[9] Logothetis NK. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature. 2008; 453: 869–878.

[10] Lang S, Duncan N, Northoff G. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery. 2014; 74: 453–465.

[11] Schramm S, Börner C, Reichert M, Baum T, Zimmer C, Heinen F, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in migraine: a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2023; 43: 3331024221128278.

[12] Hranilovich JA, Legget KT, Dodd KC, Wylie KP, Tregellas JR. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of headache: issues, best‐practices, and new directions, a narrative review. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2023; 63: 309–321.

[13] Dai L, Yu Y, Zhao H, Zhang X, Su Y, Wang X, et al. Altered local and distant functional connectivity density in chronic migraine: a resting-state functional MRI study. Neuroradiology. 2021; 63: 555–562.

[14] Zhang Y, Chen H, Zeng M, He J, Qi G, Zhang S, et al. Abnormal whole brain functional connectivity pattern homogeneity and couplings in migraine without aura. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2020; 14: 619839.

[15] Pietrobon D, Moskowitz MA. Pathophysiology of migraine. Annual Review of Physiology. 2013; 75: 365–391.

[16] Vecchia D, Pietrobon D. Migraine: a disorder of brain excitatory—inhibitory balance? Trends in Neurosciences. 2012; 35: 507–520.

[17] Weiller C, May A, Limmroth V, Jüptner M, Kaube H, Schayck RV, et al. Brain stem activation in spontaneous human migraine attacks. Nature Medicine. 1995; 1: 658–660.

[18] Akerman S, Holland PR, Goadsby PJ. Diencephalic and brainstem mechanisms in migraine. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2011; 12: 570–584.

[19] Porreca F. Chronic pain and medullary descending facilitation. Trends in Neurosciences. 2002; 25: 319–325.

[20] Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013; 33: 629–808.

[21] Büsch D, Hagemann N, Bender N. The dimensionality of the Edinburgh handedness inventory: an analysis with models of the item response theory. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition. 2010; 15: 610–628.

[22] Chang H, Jensen MP, Yang C, Lai Y. Migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire chinese version 2.1 (MSQv2.1-C): psychometric evaluation in patients with migraine. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2019; 17: 108.

[23] Speck RM, Yu R, Ford JH, Ayer DW, Bhandari R, Wyrwich KW. Psychometric validation and meaningful within‐patient change of the migraine‐specific quality of life questionnaire version 2.1 electronic patient-reported outcome in patients with episodic and chronic migraine. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2021; 61: 511–526.

[24] Martin BC, Pathak DS, Sharfman MI, Adelman JU, Taylor F, Kwong WJ, et al. Validity and reliability of the migraine‐specific quality of life questionnaire (MSQ Version 2.1). Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2000; 40: 204–216.

[25] Heller GZ, Manuguerra M, Chow R. How to analyze the visual analogue scale: myths, truths and clinical relevance. Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 2016; 13: 67–75.

[26] Liu X, Duyn JH. Time-varying functional network information extracted from brief instances of spontaneous brain activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013; 110: 4392–4397.

[27] Satterthwaite TD, Elliott MA, Gerraty RT, Ruparel K, Loughead J, Calkins ME, et al. An improved framework for confound regression and filtering for control of motion artifact in the preprocessing of resting-state functional connectivity data. NeuroImage. 2013; 64: 240–256.

[28] Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. NeuroImage. 2005; 26: 839–851.

[29] Cordes D, Haughton V M, Arfanakis K, Carew J D, Turski P A, Moritz C H, et al. Frequencies contributing to functional connectivity in the cerebral cortex in “resting-state” data. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2001; 22: 1326–1333.

[30] Zuo X, Ehmke R, Mennes M, Imperati D, Castellanos FX, Sporns O, et al. Network centrality in the human functional connectome. Cerebral Cortex. 2012; 22: 1862–1875.

[31] Hou J, Zhao M, Zhang W, Song L, Wu W, Wang J, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity abnormalities in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and their healthy first-degree relatives. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience. 2014; 39: 304–311.

[32] Yan C, Craddock RC, Zuo X, Zang Y, Milham MP. Standardizing the intrinsic brain: towards robust measurement of inter-individual variation in 1000 functional connectomes. NeuroImage. 2013; 80: 246–262.

[33] Takeuchi H, Taki Y, Nouchi R, Sekiguchi A, Hashizume H, Sassa Y, et al. Degree centrality and fractional amplitude of low-frequency oscillations associated with Stroop interference. NeuroImage. 2015; 119: 197–209.

[34] Luo X, Guo L, Dai X J, Wang Q, Zhu W, Miao X, et al. Abnormal intrinsic functional hubs in alcohol dependence: evidence from a voxelwise degree centrality analysis. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. 2017; 13: 2011–2020.

[35] Chao-Gan Y, Yu-Feng Z. DPARSF: a Matlab toolbox for “pipeline” data analysis of resting-state fMRI. Frontiers in System Neuroscience. 2010; 4: 13.

[36] Glickman ME, Rao SR, Schultz MR. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2014; 67: 850–857.

[37] Chen C, Witte M, Heemsbergen W, Herk MV. Multiple comparisons permutation test for image based data mining in radiotherapy. Radiation Oncology. 2013; 8: 293.

[38] Korthauer K, Kimes PK, Duvallet C, Reyes A, Subramanian A, Teng M, et al. A practical guide to methods controlling false discoveries in computational biology. Genome Biology. 2019; 20: 118.

[39] Bullmore E, Sporns O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2009; 10: 186–198.

[40] Sporns O. The human connectome: a complex network. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2011; 1224: 109–125.

[41] Li Z, Liu M, Lan L, Zeng F, Makris N, Liang Y, et al. Altered periaqueductal gray resting state functional connectivity in migraine and the modulation effect of treatment. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6: 20298.

[42] van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O. Network hubs in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2013; 17: 683–696.

[43] Achard S, Salvador R, Whitcher B, Suckling J, Bullmore E. A resilient, low-frequency, small-world human brain functional network with highly connected association cortical hubs. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2006; 26: 63–72.

[44] Buckner RL, Sepulcre J, Talukdar T, Krienen FM, Liu H, Hedden T, et al. Cortical hubs revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity: mapping, assessment of stability, and relation to Alzheimer’s disease. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2009; 29: 1860–1873.

[45] Zamora-López G, Zhou C, Kurths J. Cortical hubs form a module for multisensory integration on top of the hierarchy of cortical networks. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics. 2010, 4: 1.

[46] Crossley NA, Mechelli A, Scott J, Carletti F, Fox PT, McGuire P, et al. The hubs of the human connectome are generally implicated in the anatomy of brain disorders. Brain. 2014; 137: 2382–2395.

[47] Zuo X, Xing X. Test-retest reliabilities of resting-state FMRI measurements in human brain functional connectomics: a systems neuroscience perspective. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2014; 45: 100–118.

[48] Cai F, Gao L, Gong H, Jiang F, Pei C, Zhang X, et al. Network centrality of resting-state fMRI in primary angle-closure glaucoma before and after surgery. PLOS ONE. 2015; 10: e0141389.

[49] Liu W, Liu H, Wei D, Sun J, Yang J, Meng J, et al. Abnormal degree centrality of functional hubs associated with negative coping in older Chinese adults who lost their only child. Biological Psychology. 2015; 112: 46–55.

[50] Sato JR, Salum GA, Gadelha A, Vieira G, Zugman A, Picon FA, et al. Decreased centrality of subcortical regions during the transition to adolescence: a functional connectivity study. NeuroImage. 2015; 104: 44–51.

[51] Zhuang Y, Zhou F, Gong H. Intrinsic functional plasticity of the sensorimotor network in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: evidence from a centrality analysis. PLOS ONE. 2015; 10: e0130524.

[52] Di Martino A, Zuo X, Kelly C, Grzadzinski R, Mennes M, Schvarcz A, et al. Shared and distinct intrinsic functional network centrality in Autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry. 2013; 74: 623–632.

[53] Baliki MN, Chialvo DR, Geha PY, Levy RM, Harden RN, Parrish TB, et al. Chronic pain and the emotional brain: specific brain activity associated with spontaneous fluctuations of intensity of chronic back pain. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2006; 26: 12165–12173.

[54] Devinsky O, Morrell MJ, Vogt BA. Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain. 1995; 118: 279–306.

[55] Carter CS, Macdonald AM, Botvinick M, Ross LL, Stenger VA, Noll D, et al. Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2000; 97: 1944–1948.

[56] Critchley HD, Wiens S, Rotshtein P, Öhman A, Dolan RJ. Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nature Neuroscience. 2004; 7: 189–195.

[57] Zhang L, Zhang Y, Zhao Z. Anterior cingulate cortex contributes to the descending facilitatory modulation of pain via dorsal reticular nucleus. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2005; 22: 1141–1148.

[58] Goldstein RZ, Alia-Klein N, Tomasi D, Carrillo JH, Maloney T, Woicik PA, et al. Anterior cingulate cortex hypoactivations to an emotionally salient task in cocaine addiction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009; 106: 9453–9458.

[59] Russo A, Tessitore A, Giordano A, Corbo D, Marcuccio L, De Stefano M, et al. Executive resting-state network connectivity in migraine without aura. Cephalalgia. 2012; 32: 1041–1048.

[60] Tessitore A, Russo A, Conte F, Giordano A, De Stefano M, Lavorgna L, et al. Abnormal connectivity within executive resting‐state network in migraine with Aura. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2015; 55: 794–805.

[61] Yu Y, Zhao H, Dai L, Su Y, Wang X, Chen C, et al. Headache frequency associates with brain microstructure changes in patients with migraine without aura. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 2021; 15: 60–67.

[62] Xue T, Yuan K, Cheng P, Zhao L, Zhao L, Yu D, et al. Alterations of regional spontaneous neuronal activity and corresponding brain circuit changes during resting state in migraine without aura. NMR in Biomedicine. 2013; 26: 1051–1058.

[63] Louter MA, Pijpers JA, Wardenaar KJ, van Zwet EW, van Hemert AM, Zitman FG, et al. Symptom dimensions of affective disorders in migraine patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2015; 79: 458–463.

[64] Song T, Cho S, Kim W, Yang KI, Yun C, Chu MK. Anxiety and depression in probable migraine: a population-based study. Cephalalgia. 2017; 37: 845–854.

[65] Wu M, Yang Y, Chen Y. The effect of anxiety and depression on the risk of irritable bowel syndrome in migraine patients. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2017; 44: 342–345.

[66] Peres MFP, Mercante JPP, Tobo PR, Kamei H, Bigal ME. Anxiety and depression symptoms and migraine: a symptom-based approach research. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 2017; 18: 37.

[67] Zhang M, Liu Y, Zhao M, Tang W, Wang X, Dong Z, et al. Depression and anxiety behaviour in a rat model of chronic migraine. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 2017; 18: 27.

[68] Pujol J, López A, Deus J, Cardoner N, Vallejo J, Capdevila A, et al. Anatomical variability of the anterior cingulate gyrus and basic dimensions of human personality. NeuroImage. 2002; 15: 847–855.

[69] Bluhm R L, Miller J, Lanius R A, Osuch E A, Boksman K, Neufeld R W, et al. Spontaneous low-frequency fluctuations in the BOLD signal in schizophrenic patients: anomalies in the default network. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2007; 33: 1004–1012.

[70] Briggs RG, Khan AB, Chakraborty AR, Abraham CJ, Anderson CD, Karas PJ, et al. Anatomy and white matter connections of the superior frontal gyrus. Clinical Anatomy. 2020; 33: 823–832.

[71] Petrovic P, Kalso E, Petersson KM, Ingvar M. Placebo and opioid analgesia—imaging a shared neuronal network. Science. 2002; 295: 1737–1740.

[72] Kupers RC, Gybels JM, Gjedde A. Positron emission tomography study of a chronic pain patient successfully treated with somatosensory thalamic stimulation. Pain. 2000; 87: 295–302.

[73] Lieberman MD, Jarcho JM, Berman S, Naliboff BD, Suyenobu BY, Mandelkern M, et al. The neural correlates of placebo effects: a disruption account. NeuroImage. 2004; 22: 447–455.

[74] Wiech K, Ploner M, Tracey I. Neurocognitive aspects of pain perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2008; 12: 306–313.

[75] Schwedt TJ, Chong CD, Chiang C, Baxter L, Schlaggar BL, Dodick DW. Enhanced pain-induced activity of pain-processing regions in a case-control study of episodic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2014; 34: 947–958.

[76] Cheng S, Xu G, Zhou J, Qu Y, Li Z, He Z, et al. A multimodal meta-analysis of structural and functional changes in the brain of tinnitus. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2020; 14: 28.

[77] Liu Y, Lv H, Zhao P, Liu Z, Chen W, Gong S, et al. Neuroanatomical alterations in patients with early stage of unilateral pulsatile tinnitus: a voxel-based morphometry study. Neural Plasticity. 2018; 2018: 1–7.

[78] Schankin CJ, Maniyar FH, Chou DE, Eller M, Sprenger T, Goadsby PJ. Structural and functional footprint of visual snow syndrome. Brain. 2020; 143: 1106–1113.

[79] Xu Z G, Xu J J, Chen Y C, Hu J, Wu Y, Xue Y. Aberrant cerebral blood flow in tinnitus patients with migraine: a perfusion functional MRI study. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 2021; 22: 61.