Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the 8-item jaw functional limitation scale
1Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, 70100 Karaman, Turkey
2Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Bingöl University, 12000 Bingöl, Turkey
DOI: 10.22514/jofph.2025.035 Vol.39,Issue 2,June 2025 pp.166-174
Submitted: 02 December 2024 Accepted: 14 February 2024
Published: 12 June 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Nazım Tolgahan Yıldız E-mail: nazimtolgahan@kmu.edu.tr
Background: Considering that temporomandibular disorder (TMD) can negatively affect individuals’ general health and quality of life by limiting orofacial functions, it is important to evaluate jaw-related functional limitations in TMD. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the 8-item Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS-8-TR) in Turkish-speaking TMD patients. Methods: A total of 162 patients with TMD and 114 individuals without TMD participated in the study. Face and content validity were assessed. To confirm the construct validity of the JFLS-8-TR, structural (with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)), convergent (with pain severity and maximum mouth opening (MMO), Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI) and the Turkish version of the 20-item JFLS (JFLS-20-TR)) and known-group validity were analyzed. Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to examine internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Results: Both content and face validity were met. The acceptable model fit indices based on CFA confirmed the structural validity of the JFLS-8-TR. Robust associations between the JFLS-8-TR score and pain intensity (r = 0.92), MMO (r = −0.87) and scores on the FAI (r = 0.89), OHIP-14 (r = 0.86) and JFLS-20-TR (r = 0.96) supported the convergent validity (p < 0.05). The JFLS-8-TR was able to discriminate between individuals with and without TMD, indicating that it has known-group validity (p < 0.05). The internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.93) of the JFLS-8-TR were excellent. Conclusions: The JFLS-8-TR is a valid, reliable and useful instrument for a more practical assessment of functional limitations in the masticatory system in Turkish-speaking TMD patients.
Functional limitation; Masticatory system; Psychometric; Reliability; Validity; Temporomandibular disorder; Questionnaire
Nazım Tolgahan Yıldız,Hikmet Kocaman,Hasan Bingöl. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the 8-item jaw functional limitation scale. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2025. 39(2);166-174.
[1] Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP, et al; International RDC/TMD Consortium Network, International association for Dental Research; Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group, International Association for the Study of Pain. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and orofacial pain special interest group†. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2014; 28: 6–27.
[2] Yıldız NT, Kocaman H, Bingöl H. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the 20-item jaw functional limitation scale. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2025; 41: 377–389.
[3] Chung J, Lobbezoo F, van Selms MKA, Chattrattrai T, Aarab G, Mitrirattanakul S. Physical, psychological and socio-demographic predictors related to patients’ self-belief of their temporomandibular disorders’ aetiology. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2021; 48: 109–123.
[4] Valesan LF, Da-Cas CD, Réus JC, Denardin ACS, Garanhani RR, Bonotto D, et al. Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2021; 25: 441–453.
[5] Yıldız NT, Kocaman H, Bingöl H. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the oral behaviors checklist. Oral Diseases. 2024; 30: 4014–4023.
[6] Ohrbach R, Larsson P, List T. The jaw functional limitation scale: development, reliability, and validity of 8-item and 20-item versions. Journal of Orofacial Pain. 2008; 22: 219–230.
[7] Oliveira-Souza AIS, Sales LRDV, Coutinho ADF, Armijo Olivo S, de Oliveira DA. Oral health quality of life is associated to jaw function and depression in patients with myogenous temporomandibular dysfunction. CRANIO®. 2023; 41: 518–528.
[8] Xu L, He Y, Fan S, Cai B, Fang Z, Dai K. Validation of a Chinese version of the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale in relation to the diagnostic subgroup of temporomandibular disorders. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2020; 47: 1–8.
[9] Ohrbach R, Granger C, List T, Dworkin S. Preliminary development and validation of the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2008; 36: 228–236.
[10] Tedin Ng FN, Kadir K, Yusof ZYM. Reliability and validity of the Malaysian English version of the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorder (M-English DC/TMD). Healthcare. 2022; 10: 329.
[11] Fetai A, Dedic B, Lajnert V, Spalj S. To what extent are the characteristics of painful temporomandibular disorders predictors of self-reported limitations in jaw function? CRANIO®. 2023; 41: 290–297.
[12] Polat S, Polat N, Cetioglu A. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: assessment instruments (Turkish). 2016. Available at: https://inform-iadr.com/index.php/tmd-assessmentdiagnosis/dc-tmd-translations/ (Accessed: 08 December 2023).
[13] Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2010; 63: 737–745.
[14] Floyd FJ, Widaman KF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment. 1995; 7: 286–299.
[15] Shirali G, Shekari M, Angali KA. Assessing reliability and validity of an instrument for measuring resilience safety culture in sociotechnical systems. Safety and Health at Work. 2018; 9: 296–307.
[16] Yıldız NT, Kocaman H, Yıldırım H. Predictors of the masticatory muscle activity during chewing in patients with myogenous temporomandibular disorder. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2023; 27: 6547–6558.
[17] Arikan H, Citaker S, Ucok C. Psychometric properties of the fonseca anamnestic index (FAI) for temporomandibular disorders: Turkish version, responsiveness, reliability, and validity study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2024; 46: 1408–1415.
[18] Yap AU, Zhang MJ, Lei J, Fu KY. Diagnostic accuracy of the short-form Fonseca anamnestic index in relation to the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022; 128: 977–983.
[19] Gałczyńska-Rusin M, Pobudek-Radzikowska M, Czajka-Jakubowska A. Polish language adaptation and validation of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index for individuals with temporomandibular disorders. Dental and Medical Problems. 2024; 61: 705–711.
[20] Balci N, Alkan N, Gurgan CA. Psychometric properties of a Turkish version of the oral health impact profile-14. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2017; 20: 19–24.
[21] Yıldız NT, Alkan A, Külünkoğlu BA. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of mandibular function impairment questionnaire. CRANIO®. 2024; 42: 160–170.
[22] Dalawi I, Isa MR, Chen XW, Azhar ZI, Aimran N. Development of the Malay Language of understanding, attitude, practice and health literacy questionnaire on COVID-19 (MUAPHQ C-19): content validity & face validity analysis. BMC Public Health. 2023; 23: 1131.
[23] Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiology and Health Services. 2017; 26: 649–659.
[24] Brown TA. Specification and interpretation of CFA models. In Little TD (ed.) Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (pp. 88–130). 2nd edn. Guilford Press: New York, USA. 2015.
[25] Bingol H, Gunel MK, Asena Sel S, Burc E, Fidan H. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the KIDSCREEN-27 for individuals with cerebral palsy. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2023; 130: 317–339.
[26] Calixtre LB, Oliveira AB, Alburquerque-Sendín F, Armijo-Olivo S. What is the minimal important difference of pain intensity, mandibular function, and headache impact in patients with temporomandibular disorders? Clinical significance analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Musculoskeletal Science & Practice. 2020; 46: 102108.
[27] Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2017; 16: 346.
[28] Kim HK, Kim ME. Disturbed sleep may be a core risk factor for jaw functional limitation in patients with painful temporomandibular disorders. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2021; 48: 1013–1024.
Science Citation Index (SCI)
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)
BIOSIS Previews
Scopus: CiteScore 3.1 (2024)
Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)
Top