Article Data

  • Views 996
  • Dowloads 43

Original Research

Open Access

Combination effect of ultrasound-guided superior cervical ganglion block and standard triptan for migraine attacks

  • Hong Yue1
  • Pengchao Li2
  • Li Yuan3
  • Guang Feng4
  • Liangliang He5,*,

1Department of Pain Management, Peking University Shougang Hospital, 100144 Beijing, China

2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Huguosi TCM Hospital, affiliated with Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100035 Beijing, China

3Department of Acupuncture and Encephalopathy, Beijing Huguosi TCM Hospital, affiliated with Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100035 Beijing, China

4Department of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, Peking University Shougang Hospital, 100144 Beijing, China

5Department of Pain Management, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100053 Beijing, China

DOI: 10.22514/jofph.2025.038 Vol.39,Issue 2,June 2025 pp.193-201

Submitted: 07 January 2025 Accepted: 13 March 2025

Published: 12 June 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Liangliang He E-mail: lianglianghepain@163.com

Abstract

Background: To examine whether the combination of ultrasound (US)-guided superior cervical ganglion (SCG) block with standard triptans has a superior relief of headache as compared to triptans alone for acute migraine. Methods: The retrospective-prospective cohort study enrolled patients presenting with acute migraine. The records of 243 cases receiving standard triptans and an adjunctive US-guided SCG were reviewed, while 230 cases were prospectively enrolled to receive triptan alone for control after age and sex matching in a 1:1.2 ratio. The primary endpoint was sustained headache relief and complete freedom from pain within post-procedural 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included headache relief and freedom from pain at 2 hours, monthly migraine days (MMDs), migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) scores, migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire (MSQ) scores, need for rescue analgesics use and adverse events. Results: Sustained headache relief was observed in 69.5% of cases in the SCG cohort, yielding a superior outcome increased by 21.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 13.1%, 30.4%) (p < 0.001). Overall, SCG block plus triptans had a better effect on headache relief and freedom from pain at post-procedural 2 hours, and sustained freedom from headache within 24 hours compared to triptans alone. At 1-month visit, SCG cohort also showed a greater improvement in MMDs (p < 0.01), MIDAS scores (p = 0.040) and MSQ scores (p = 0.036). No major adverse events were observed. Conclusions: There was a superior therapeutic effectiveness of US-guided SCG block in conjunction with standard triptans for better headache relief up to post-procedural 1 month in acute migraine. It had an adjunctive beneficial effect in functional ability, life quality and possible facilitation of avoiding more adverse events.


Keywords

Superior cervical ganglion; Nerve block; Ultrasound guidance; Headache relief; Monthly migraine days; Migraine disability


Cite and Share

Hong Yue, Pengchao Li, Li Yuan, Guang Feng, Liangliang He. Combination effect of ultrasound-guided superior cervical ganglion block and standard triptan for migraine attacks. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2025. 39(2);193-201.

References

[1] Hervias T. An update on migraine: current and new treatment options. Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants. 2024; 37: 1–7.

[2] Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ. Global epidemiology of migraine and its implications for public health and health policy. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2023; 19: 109–117.

[3] Maeda A, Chikama Y, Tanaka R, Tominaga M, Shirozu K, Yamaura K. Safety and utility of ultrasound-guided superior cervical ganglion block for headaches and orofacial pain: a retrospective, single-center study of 10 patients. JA Clinical Reports. 2023; 9: 21.

[4] Wang Y, Liang J, Fang Y, Yao D, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Burden of common neurologic diseases in Asian countries, 1990–2019: an analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Neurology. 2023; 100: e2141–e2154.

[5] Karsan N. Pathophysiology of migraine. Continuum. 2024; 30: 325–343.

[6] Noseda R, Burstein R. Migraine pathophysiology: anatomy of the trigeminovascular pathway and associated neurological symptoms, cortical spreading depression, sensitization, and modulation of pain. Pain. 2013; 154: S44–S53.

[7] Puledda F, Sacco S, Diener HC, Ashina M, Al-Khazali HM, Ashina S, et al. International headache society global practice recommendations for the acute pharmacological treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia. 2024; 44: 2069669574.

[8] Wei J, Yan L, Liu T, Xu W, Shi Z, Wu T, et al. Cervical sympathectomy reduces neurogenic vasodilation in dura mater of rats. Autonomic Neuroscience. 2011; 162: 10–14.

[9] D’Agnano D, Cernigliaro F, Ferretti A, Lo CS, Correnti E, Terrin G, et al. The role of the autonomic nervous system in epilepsy and migraine: a narrative review. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience. 2024; 23: 128.

[10] Gazerani P, Cairns BE. Dysautonomia in the pathogenesis of migraine. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2018; 18: 153–165.

[11] Arslan D, Unal CI. Interactions between the painful disorders and the autonomic nervous system. Agriculture. 2022; 34: 155–165.

[12] von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. International Journal of Surgery. 2014; 12: 1495–1499.

[13] Lau CI, Wang YF. 2022 Taiwan guidelines for acute treatment of migraine. Acta Neurologica Taiwanica. 2022; 31: 89–113.

[14] Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013; 33: 629–808.

[15] Headache classification committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) the international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018; 38: 1–211.

[16] Farrar JT, Young JJ, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001; 94: 149–158.

[17] Hung PH, Fuh JL, Wang SJ. Validity, reliability and application of the Taiwan version of the migraine disability assessment questionnaire. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2006; 105: 563–568.

[18] Rendas-Baum R, Bloudek LM, Maglinte GA, Varon SF. The psychometric properties of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQ) in chronic migraine patients. Quality of Life Research. 2013; 22: 1123–1133.

[19] Kirkpatrick K, Khan MH, Deng Y, Shah KB. A review of stellate ganglion block as an adjunctive treatment modality. Cureus. 2023; 15: e35174.

[20] Singh H, Rajarathinam M. Stellate ganglion block beyond chronic pain: a literature review on its application in painful and non-painful conditions. Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology. 2024; 40: 185–191.

[21] Yu B, Hou S, Xing Y, Jia Z, Luo F. Ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block for the treatment of migraine in elderly patients: a retrospective and observational study. Headache. 2023; 63: 763–770.

[22] Hou J, Pu S, Xu X, Lu Z, Wu J. Real-time ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block for migraine: an observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022; 22: 78.

[23] Deng JJ, Zhang CL, Liu DW, Huang T, Xu J, Liu QY, et al. Treatment of stellate ganglion block in diseases: its role and application prospect. World Journal of Clinical Cases. 2023; 11: 2160–2167.

[24] Mo K, Qian L, Tian J, Liao J, Tan F, Kong W, et al. Ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion blockade—patient positioning is everything: a case report demonstrating the efficacy of a modified out-of-plane approach. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2024; 17: 1288484.

[25] Boljanovic J, Milisavljevic M, Latas M, Puskas L, Bogosavljevic N, Vujacic M, et al. Arterial supply and morphological characteristics of sympathetic neurons in the human superior cervical ganglion. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2024; 18: 1372180.

[26] Oliveira LB, Batista S, Prestes MZ, Bocanegra-Becerra JE, Rabelo NN, Bertani R, et al. Stellate ganglion block in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a promising protective measure against vasospasm? World Neurosurgery. 2024; 182: 124–131.

[27] Harris CL, Hamid B, Rosenquist RW, Schultz-Stubner SH. Ganglionic local opioid application (GLOA) for treatment of chronic headache and facial pain. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 2006; 31: 460–462.

[28] Burch R. Acute treatment of migraine. Continuum. 2024; 30: 344–363.

[29] Harder HJ. Treatment of migrain blanche and ophthalmique with blocks of the superior cervical ganglion. A positive study on 84 patients (author’s transl). Anaesthesist. 1981; 30: 1–9.

[30] Moon S, Lee J, Jeon Y. Bilateral stellate ganglion block for migraine: a case report. Medicine. 2020; 99: e20023.

[31] Cady RK, Saper J, Dexter K, Cady RJ, Manley HR. Long-term efficacy of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study for repetitive sphenopalatine blockade with bupivacaine vs. saline with the Tx360 device for treatment of chronic migraine. Headache. 2015; 55: 529–542.

[32] Viva MG, Sveva V, Ruggiero M, Fai A, Savina A, Perrone R, et al. Efficacy and accuracy of ultrasound guided injections in the treatment of cervical facet joint syndrome: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13: 5290.

[33] Moon S, Ko M, Kim S, Kim H, Oh D. Superior cervical sympathetic ganglion block under ultrasound guidance promotes recovery of abducens nerve palsy caused by microvascular ischemia. Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 2019; 20: 211–214.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus: CiteScore 3.1 (2024)

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Top