Article Data

  • Views 2186
  • Dowloads 104

Original Research

Open Access

Exploration of a pain assessment tool on burning mouth syndrome

  • Takumi Shimura1,†
  • Tatsuki Itagaki1,*,†,
  • Ken-ichiro Sakata1
  • Takuya Asaka1
  • Masayuki Shinohara1
  • Sadasuke Hayata1
  • Ikuya Miyamoto1

1Oral Diagnosis and Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hokkaido University, 060-8586 Sapporo, Japan

DOI: 10.22514/jofph.2025.060 Vol.39,Issue 3,September 2025 pp.183-190

Submitted: 07 March 2025 Accepted: 04 June 2025

Published: 12 September 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Tatsuki Itagaki E-mail: titagaki@den.hokudai.ac.jp

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Background: Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic orofacial pain disorder. The etiology and pathophysiology of BMS remain unclear; multiple factors may interact in complex ways. There is a need for simpler and more cost-effective BMS evaluation criteria. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire version 2 (SF-MPQ-2) in patients with BMS and develop a subscale based on factor analysis of the results to classify patients per their symptoms. Methods: Several factors such as patient characteristics (age, sex, smoking habit, and medical history), the SF-MPQ-2 (original: eleven-point rating scale and modified: four-point rating scale), and the numerical rating scale (NRS) of BMS were examined and analyzed. Results: In total, 38 patients were enrolled. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.93 (0.88–0.96) and 0.83 (0.74–0.90) for the SF-MPQ-2 (original) and SF-MPQ-2 (Modified), respectively. Only the correlation between the NRS and the SF-MPQ-2 (Modified) reached statistical significance. These results showed that the SF-MPQ-2 (Modified) were more reliable than the SF-MPQ-2 (Original). Factor analysis led to classification into three new factors. Conclusions: SF-MPQ-2 was useful for BMS. In current clinical practice, the modified questionnaire may yield similar or better results, and a more precise treatment strategy can be pursued by classifying responses according to the proposed subscales and examining treatment effects.


Keywords

Burning mouth syndrome (BMS); The short form of the McGill pain questionnaire version 2 (SF-MPQ-2); Oral dysesthesia; Research diagnostic criteria


Cite and Share

Takumi Shimura,Tatsuki Itagaki,Ken-ichiro Sakata,Takuya Asaka,Masayuki Shinohara,Sadasuke Hayata,Ikuya Miyamoto. Exploration of a pain assessment tool on burning mouth syndrome. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2025. 39(3);183-190.

References

[1] International Classification of Orofacial Pain, 1st edition (ICOP). Cephalalgia. 2020; 40: 129–221.

[2] Russo M, Crafa P, Guglielmetti S, Franzoni L, Fiore W, Di Mario F. Burning mouth syndrome etiology: a narrative review. Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases. 2022; 31: 223–228.

[3] Mao F, Cai L, Pan D, Huang M, Wang Q, Chen Q, et al. Burning mouth syndrome may essentially be related to psychoneuroimmunology: mechanism hypothesis. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2025; 52: 199–207.

[4] Femminella GD, Canfora F, Musella G, Di Tella GS, Ugga L, Pecoraro G, et al. Cognitive profile in burning mouth syndrome versus mild cognitive impairment: a comparative study. Oral Diseases. 2025; 31: 611–632.

[5] De Lima-Souza RA, Pérez-de-Oliveira ME, Normando AGC, Louredo BVR, Mariano FV, Farag AM, et al. Clinical and epidemiological profile of burning mouth syndrome patients following the International Headache Society classification: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2024; 137: 119–135.

[6] Dalirsani Z, Amirchaghmaghi M, Semnani MM, Talebi M, Hashemy SI, Shakeri MT, et al. Comparison of salivary opiorphin in burning mouth syndrome and healthy subjects and its correlation with psychiatric disorders. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research. 2024; 10: e934.

[7] Lv K, Lu Y, Shen C, Yao Y, Chen T, Yao H. Studies on burning mouth syndrome in the past 20 years: a bibliometric and visualised analysis. International Dental Journal. 2025; 75: 426–438.

[8] Currie CC, Ohrbach R, De Leeuw R, Forssell H, Imamura Y, Jaaskelainen SK, et al. Developing a research diagnostic criteria for burning mouth syndrome: results from an international Delphi process. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2021; 48: 308–331.

[9] Itagaki T, Nakamura K, Tanabe T, Shimura T, Nakai Y, Sakata SI, et al. Rikkosan’s short-term analgesic effect on burning mouth syndrome: a single-arm cohort study. Biomedicines. 2024; 12: 1013.

[10] Zhang Q, Li X, Wang Z, Shen S, Wang J, Chen J, et al. A pilot study of the relationship between salivary microbial characteristics and endocrine and immune function in patients with burning mouth syndrome. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2024; 29: 11.

[11] Jang S, Kim JE, Lee YH, Jung W. Changes in salivary biomarkers of burning mouth syndrome patients after clonazepam treatment. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2024; 38: 111–118.

[12] Wu S, Li L, Wang X, Yan Z. Saliva and tongue microbiota in burning mouth syndrome: an exploratory study of potential roles. Oral Diseases. 2024; 30: 5370–5378.

[13] Fernández‐Agra M, González‐Serrano J, De Pedro M, Virto L, Caponio VCA, Ibáñez‐Prieto E, et al. Salivary biomarkers in burning mouth syndrome: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Oral Diseases. 2023; 29: 2600–2613.

[14] Scribante A, Pellegrini M, Pulicari F, Ghizzoni M, Modugno FP, Spadari F. Pain assessment in oral medicine through its different dimensions: a comprehensive review. Dentistry Journal. 2023; 11: 246.

[15] Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Revicki DA, Harding G, Coyne GS, Peirce-Sandner S, et al. Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2). Pain. 2009; 144: 35–42.

[16] Meissner JE. McGill-Melzack pain questionnaire. Nursing. 1980; 10: 50–51.

[17] Melzack R. The short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain. 1987; 30: 191–197.

[18] Adelmanesh F, Jalali A, Attarian H, Farahani B, Ketabchi SM, Arvantaj A, et al. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity measures of expanded and revised version of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2) in Iranian patients with neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain. Pain Medicine. 2012; 13: 1631–1636.

[19] Maruo T, Nakae A, Maeda L, Takahashi-Narita K, Morris S, Yokoe M, et al. Translation and reliability and validity of a Japanese version of the revised Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2). Pain Research. 2013; 28: 43–53.

[20] Safdar S, Friedlmeier W, Matsumoto D, Yoo SH, Kwantes CT, Kakai H, et al. Variations of emotional display rules within and across cultures: a comparison between Canada, USA, and Japan. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. 2009; 41: 1–10.

[21] Sato Boku A, Kimura H, Tokura T, Umemura E, Miyauchi T, Ito M, et al. Evaluation of patients suffered from burning mouth syndrome and persistent idiopathic facial pain using Japanese version PainDETECT questionnaire and depression scales. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2021; 16: 131–136.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus: CiteScore 3.1 (2024)

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Top