Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Sensitivity, specificity and prevalences—comparison of four screening tests for temporomandibular disorders
1CMD-Zentrum Berlin, 13187 Berlin, BE, Germany
2Department of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, BE, Germany
3MESANTIS 3D DENTAL-RADIOLOGICUM, Bumann-Academy, 13187 Berlin, BE, Germany
DOI: 10.22514/jofph.2025.069 Vol.39,Issue 4,December 2025 pp.100-121
Submitted: 22 May 2025 Accepted: 11 July 2025
Published: 12 December 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Axel Bumann E-mail: ab@bumann-academy.com
Background: This prospective clinical study investigates whether functionally compensated but clinically inapparent temporomandibular disorder (TMD) findings can be detected in individuals without pre-existing medical conditions. Methods: A total of 200 participants (10–50 years) without a medical history were examined using screening methods: Craniomandibular Disorders (CMD)-Short Finding, CMD-Screening, Preventive Manual Structural Analysis (PMSA), and Preventive Structural Stress Screening (PSSS). The Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Axis I served as the reference standard. Five diagnoses were analyzed based on prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, 95% confidence intervals, and p-values (McNemar, Cochran Q). Results: TMD findings were detectable. PMSA and PSSS always produced identical results (p = 1.000), differing significantly from CMD-Short Finding for arthralgia and disc displacement (p < 0.001), and from CMD-Screening for myogenic pain (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between PMSA/PSSS and CMD-Screening for arthralgia (p = 0.528) or CMD-Short Finding for myogenic pain (p = 0.490). Not all tests achieved a 70% sensitivity and a 95%specificity. The most important results are summarized here: arthralgia (0.0%–15.0%) by PMSA/PSSS (sensitivity 96.00% [79.65–99.90], specificity 96.57% [92.69–98.73], p = 0.125); myogenic pain (34.5%–49.5%) by CMD-Screening (excluding digastric muscle: sensitivity 84.15% [74.42–91.28], specificity 100.00% [96.92–100.00], p < 0.001) and by PMSA/PSSS (including digastric muscle: sensitivity 98.02% [93.03–99.76], specificity 100.00% [96.34–100.00], p = 0.500); disc displacement (14.5%–20.5%) by CMD-Short Finding (sensitivity 100.00% [85.18–100.00], specificity 96.61%[92.77–98.75], p = 0.031); degenerative joint disease and disc displacement without reduction with limited opening showed very low prevalence (0.0%–1.0%), which results in limiting reliability. Conclusions: TMD findings were detectable in asymptomatic individuals. PMSA and PSSS were the most suitable screening tools. The results support the need for regular screening, and further studies. Clinical Trial Registration: DRKS00035175, https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00035175, retrospectively registered.
Temporomandibular disorder; Screening; Sensitivity; Specificity
Maria Ertl,Florian Beuer,Axel Bumann. Sensitivity, specificity and prevalences—comparison of four screening tests for temporomandibular disorders. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2025. 39(4);100-121.
[1] LeResche L. Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: implications for the investigation of etiologic factors. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine. 1997; 8: 291–305.
[2] Slade GD, Ohrbach R, Greenspan JD, Fillingim RB, Bair E, Sanders AE, et al. Painful temporomandibular disorder: decade of discovery from OPPERA studies. Journal of Dental Research. 2016; 95: 1084–1092.
[3] Bumann A, Lotzmann U. The role of dentistry in a multidisciplinary diagnostic approach (English edition). Georg Thieme Verlag: Stuttgart. 2000.
[4] Munich regional court: Judgment of 18 January 2017—3 U 5039/13. 2017. Available at: https://www.iww.de/quellenmaterial/id/206105 (Accessed: 28 December 2022). (In German)
[5] Hamm Regional Court: Judgment of 4 July 2014—26 U 131/13. 2014. Available at: https://openjur.de/u/707874.html (Accessed: 28 December 2022). (In German)
[6] Scientific statement by the German society of dentistry and oral medicine. Clinical Functional Analysis. 2003. Available at: https://www.dgzmk.de/web/suite-dgzmk/klinische-funktionsanalyse?p_p_id=56_INSTANCE_YV9D1rKHI9fz&p_p_lifecycle=0&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&p_p_col_id=column-1&#p_56_INSTANCE_YV9D1rKHI9fz (Accessed: 28 December 2022). (In German)
[7] Civil Code. Book 2: Law of obligations (sections 241–853), section 8: individual obligations (sections 433–853), title 8: service contracts and similar contracts (sections 611–630h), subtitle 2: treatment contracts (sections 630a–630h), duty to inform (section 630e), 26 February 2013. 2013. Available at: https://dejure.org/gesetze/BGB/630e.html (Accessed: 28 January 2023). (In German)
[8] Maxim LD, Niebo R, Utell MJ. Screening tests: a review with examples. Inhalation Toxicology. 2014; 26: 811–828.
[9] S3 guideline of the German Society for General and Family Medicine (DEGAM). “Care of patients with chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysis in general practice”, AWMF registration number 053-0482019. 2019. Available at: https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/053-048 (Accessed: 08 January 2023). (In German)
[10] Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Månsson M, Tammela TLJ, Zappa M, Nelen V, et al.; ERSPC investigators. A 16-yr follow-up of the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. European Urology. 2019; 76: 43–51.
[11] Adedinsewo DA, Pollak AW, Phillips SD, Smith TL, Svatikova A, Hayes SN, et al. Cardiovascular disease screening in women: leveraging artificial intelligence and digital tools. Circulation Research. 2022; 130: 673–690.
[12] Rukat H, Kielbassa AM. The Periodontal Screening Index (PSI)—A tool for early periodontal diagnosis. ZWR-Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt. 2004; 113: 271–275. (In German)
[13] Bavarian association of statutory health insurance dentists. Periodontal care concept – concept for the treatment of periodontal disease in persons insured under statutory health insurance. 2017. Available at: https://www.kzbv.de/par-versorgungskonzept.1191.de.html (Accessed: 08 January 2023). (In German)
[14] Ottl P, Peroz I, Lange M. CMD screening. 2020. Available at: https://www.dgfdt.de/documents/266840/22655647/CMD-Screening+2020/9546df75-5798-4a84-871d-2d16742e38bc (Accessed: 21 January 2021).
[15] Maghsudi M. An investigation into the validity and diagnostic significance of Krogh-Poulson’s “small functional analysis” as a screening test for craniomandibular dysfunction. [doctoral thesis]. Hamburg: Clinic and polyclinic for dental, oral, and maxillofacial diseases, university medical center Hamburg-Eppendorf. 2000. (In German)
[16] Ahlers MO, Jakstat HA. Identifying patients with functional disorders. Zahnmedizin up2date. 2008; 2: 143–155. (In German)
[17] Ahlers MO, Jakstat HA. CMD screening using the “CMD-Short Finding”. ZWR-Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt. 2015; 124: 102–106. (In German)
[18] Ahlers MO, Jakstat HA. Clinical functional analysis, manual structural analysis, interdisciplinary diagnostics. Stomatology Edu Journal. 2014; 1: 144. (In German)
[19] Bumann A, Zukorlic H, Christ C, Petrov L. Medical and forensic requirements for routine functional analysis in daily orthodontics. Kieferorthopädie. 2020; 34: 397–408. (In German)
[20] Bumann A, Zukorlic H, Christ C, Petrov L. Cloud-based app for functional diagnostics. 2020. Available at: https://epaper.zwp-online.info/epaper/9261/export-article/16 (Accessed: 28 January 2023). (In German)
[21] Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2014; 28: 6–27.
[22] Ohrbach R, Gonzalez Y, List T, Michelotti A, Schiffman E. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) clinical examination protocol. 2014. Available at: www.rdc-tmdinternational.org (Accessed: 07 August 2020).
[23] Rauch A, Hahnel SF, Schierz O. Development of an instructional movie illustrating a standardized clinical examination on patients with TMD symptoms. GMS Journal for Medical Education. 2020; 37: Doc39.
[24] Asendorf A, Möllenkamp J, Schierz O, Rauch A, Asendorf T, Rammelsberg P, et al. Interexaminer reliability of the German version of the DC/TMD. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2021; 48: 28–34.
[25] Steenks M, Türp J, de Wijer A. Reliability and validity of the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders axis I in clinical and research settings: a critical appraisal. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2018; 32: 7–18.
[26] Schiffman E, Ohrbach R. Critical commentary 2: reliability and validity of the DC/TMD axis I. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2018; 32: 22–24.
[27] Ertl M. Comparison of four CMD screening methods in anamnestically asymptomatic patients [doctoral thesis]. Berlin: Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin. 2025. (In German)
[28] Bumann A. CMD curriculum. 2018. Available at: https://viz.de/cmd-curriculum-list/ (Accessed: 11 August 2023).
[29] Federal statistics office: population by age group. 2025. Available at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Bevoelkerungsstand/Tabellen/liste-altersgruppen.html (Accessed: 03 January 2023). (In German)
[30] Helkimo M. Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1974; 32: 255–267.
[31] Hirsch C. Craniomandibular dysfunction (CMD) in children and adolescents—prevalence, impairments, and influences on physical development [doctoral thesis]. Halle: Martin-Luther-Universität. 2003. (In German)
[32] Lipton J, Ship J, Larach-Robinson D. Estimated prevalence and distribution of reported orofacial pain in the United States. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1993; 124: 115–121.
[33] Agerberg G, Inkapööl I. Craniomandibular disorders in an urban Swedish population. Journal of Craniomandibular Disorders. 1990; 4: 154–164.
[34] Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. Journal of Craniomandibular Disorders. 1992; 6: 301–355.
[35] Türp JC, Schindler HJ. Screening for temporomandibular disorders: a sensible approach? Der Schmerz. 2020; 34: 13–20. (In German)
[36] Türp JC, Schindler HJ. Fishing for patients…? Der Schmerz. 2020; 34: 438. (In German)
[37] The Radiation Protection Act (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 1966), as amended by the announcement of 3 January 2022 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 15) and the announcement of 27 June 2017. 2017. Available at: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/strlschg/ (Accessed: 28 December 2022). (In German)
[38] Reißmann DR, John MT, Schierz O, Hirsch C. An abbreviated version of RDC/TMD. Der Schmerz. 2009; 23: 618-–627. (In German)
[39] Parthier R. Fundamentals of measurement technology for all technical disciplines and industrial engineers. 4th edition. Vieweg + Teubner Verlag: Wiesbaden. 2001. (In German)
Science Citation Index (SCI)
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)
BIOSIS Previews
Scopus: CiteScore 3.1 (2024)
Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)
Top