Article Data

  • Views 248
  • Dowloads 26

Original Research

Open Access Special Issue

Translation, cultural adaptation, and preliminary data evaluation of the Standardized Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism (STAB) and BruxScreen in Turkey

  • Berk Bilgen1,*,
  • Mehmet Berk Kaffaf2
  • Pınar Şeşen2
  • Sina Saygılı1
  • Ayşenur Özcan-Sezgin1
  • Süleyman Çağatay Dayan3
  • Hanefi Kurt4
  • Olcay Şakar1
  • Frank Lobbezoo5,6,†
  • Daniele Manfredini7,†

1Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, 34116 Istanbul, Türkiye

2Department of Prosthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Kent University, 34433 Istanbul, Türkiye

3Department of Dental Services, Vocational School of Health Services, Istanbul Cerrahpaşa University-Cerrahpasa, 34098 Istanbul, Türkiye

4Vocational School of Health Services, Istanbul Bilgi University, 34387 Istanbul, Türkiye

5Department of Orofacial Pain and Dysfunction, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands

6Department of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö, Sweden

7Department of Medical Biotechnologies, School of Dentistry, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy

DOI: 10.22514/jofph.2026.024 Vol.40,Issue 2,March 2026 pp.94-104

Submitted: 06 September 2025 Accepted: 30 October 2025

Published: 12 March 2026

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Comprehensive Approach to Patients with Orofacial Pain)

*Corresponding Author(s): Berk Bilgen E-mail: berk.bilgen@istanbul.edu.tr

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Background: The Standardized Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism (STAB) and Bruxism Screener (BruxScreen) are instruments developed to support the structured evaluation of bruxism across clinical and research settings. For effective use in different populations, translation, cultural adaptation, and preliminary data collection are essential. This study aimed to translate the STAB and BruxScreen into Turkish and evaluate their comprehensibility, feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary clinical applicability. Methods: Translation and cultural adaptation of both instruments into Turkish were performed according to original developers’ guidelines. A panel of 12 experts in prosthodontics and/or orofacial pain supervised the process. Independent forward and backward translations were conducted and pilot-tested using the “Three-Step Test Interview” among patients, dentists, and dental students. Additionally, preliminary data were collected using selected components of both instruments to explore their clinical utility. Results: Both instruments were translated and culturally adapted. Pilot testing confirmed the face validity and demonstrated high levels of comprehensibility, feasibility, and acceptability across participant groups. Preliminary data collected from patients supported the instruments’ applicability and initial clinical utility within the Turkish population. Conclusions: The Turkish versions of both instruments appear to be valid and feasible tools for standardized bruxism assessment. The observed alignment between the outcomes of both instruments underscores their complementary nature and supports their combined use. Their integration may enhance the multidimensional evaluation of bruxism and contribute to international efforts aimed at refining and harmonizing assessment protocols across populations.


Keywords

STAB; BruxScreen; Bruxism; Bruxism assessment; Bruxism tool; Translation; Cultural adaptation


Cite and Share

Berk Bilgen,Mehmet Berk Kaffaf,Pınar Şeşen,Sina Saygılı,Ayşenur Özcan-Sezgin,Süleyman Çağatay Dayan,Hanefi Kurt,Olcay Şakar,Frank Lobbezoo,Daniele Manfredini. Translation, cultural adaptation, and preliminary data evaluation of the Standardized Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism (STAB) and BruxScreen in Turkey. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2026. 40(2);94-104.

References

[1] Colonna A, Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Bracci A, Pollis M, Val M, et al. Standardised Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism: translation, cultural adaptation and pilot testing in Italy. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2025; 52: 144–150.

[2] Manfredini D, Ahlberg J, Aarab G, Bender S, Bracci A, Cistulli PA, et al. Standardised Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2024; 51: 29–58.

[3] Manfredini D, Ahlberg J, Aarab G, Bracci A, Durham J, Emodi-Perlman A, et al. The development of the Standardised Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism (STAB): an international road map. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2024; 51: 15–28.

[4] Bracci A, Lobbezoo F, Colonna A, Bender S, Conti PCR, Emodi-Perlman A, et al. Research routes on awake bruxism metrics: implications of the updated bruxism definition and evaluation strategies. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2024; 51: 150–161.

[5] Manfredini D, Ahlberg J, Lobbezoo F. Bruxism definition: past, present, and future—What should a prosthodontist know? Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022; 128: 905–912.

[6] Bracci A, Lobbezoo F, Häggman-Henrikson B, Colonna A, Nykänen L, Pollis M, et al. Current knowledge and future perspectives on awake bruxism assessment: expert consensus recommendations. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11: 5083.

[7] Manfredini D, Ahlberg J, Lavigne GJ, Svensson P, Lobbezoo F. Five years after the 2018 consensus definitions of sleep and awake bruxism: an explanatory note. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2024; 51: 623–624.

[8] Verhoeff MC, Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Bender S, Bracci A, Colonna A, et al. Updating the bruxism definitions: report of an international consensus meeting. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2025; 52: 1335–1342.

[9] Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Raphael KG, Wetselaar P, Glaros AG, Kato T, et al. International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: report of a work in progress. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2018; 45: 837–844.

[10] Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Glaros AG, Kato T, Koyano K, Lavigne GJ, et al. Bruxism defined and graded: an international consensus. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2013; 40: 2–4.

[11] Manfredini D, Ahlberg J, Aarab G, Bracci A, Durham J, Ettlin D, et al. Towards a Standardized Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism (STAB)-overview and general remarks of a multidimensional bruxism evaluation system. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2020; 47: 549–556.

[12] Manfredini D, Ahlberg J, Wetselaar P, Svensson P, Lobbezoo F. The bruxism construct: from cut-off points to a continuum spectrum. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2019; 46: 991–997.

[13] Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Verhoeff MC, Aarab G, Bracci A, Koutris M, et al. The Bruxism Screener (BruxScreen): development, pilot testing and face validity. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2024; 51: 59–66.

[14] Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Nykänen L, Manfredini D, Verhoeff MC. Let’s start using the BruxScreen to perform the still-needed psychometric tests. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2025; 52: 121–122.

[15] Mungia R, Lobbezoo F, Funkhouser E, Glaros A, Manfredini D, Ahlberg J, et al. Dental practitioner approaches to bruxism: preliminary findings from the national dental practice-based research network. CRANIO®. 2025; 43: 480–488.

[16] Näsänen J, Karaharju-Suvanto T, Lobbezoo F, Verhoeff MC, Lappalainen OP, Nykänen L. Self-assessed competence in relation to bruxism among undergraduate dental students in Finland. CRANIO®. 2026; 44: 160–170.

[17] Fricton V, Larkin N, Sangalli L, Prodoehl J, Rayens WS, Fricton J. Confidence in diagnosing and treating temporomandibular disorders among dental students and faculty following implementation of the revised standards 2-24k: a cross-sectional study. CRANIO®. 2026; 44: 249–262.

[18] Şahin T. Bruxism awareness and self-assessment in dental clinical students: a questionnaire-based study. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 1223.

[19] Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Verhoeff MC, Bracci A, Nykänen L, Manfredini D. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Standardized Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism (STAB) and the Bruxism Screener (BruxScreen): a 12-step guideline. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2024; 51: 67–73.

[20] Suhonen R, Stolt M, Papastavrou E. Individualized care: theory, measurement, research and practice. 1st edn. Springer: Cham. 2018.

[21] De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. 1st edn. Cambridge University Press: USA. 2011.

[22] Ohrbach R, Markiewicz MR, McCall WD III. Waking-state oral parafunctional behaviors: specificity and validity as assessed by electromyography. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2008; 116: 438–444.

[23] Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP, et al.; International RDC/TMD Consortium Network, International association for Dental Research; Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group, International Association for the Study of Pain. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2014; 28: 6–27.

[24] Cigdem Karacay B, Sahbaz T. Investigation of the relationship between probable sleep bruxism, awake bruxism and temporomandibular disorders using the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Dental and Medical Problems. 2023; 60: 601–608.

[25] Ohrbach R, Bjorner J, Jezewski M, John MT, Lobezzo F. Guidelines for establishing cultural equivalency of instruments. 2013. Available at: https://ubwp.buffalo.edu/rdc-tmdinternational/wp-content/uploads/sites/58/2017/01/Guidelines-for-Translation-and-Cultural-Equivalency-of-Instruments-2013_05_118608.pdf (Accessed: 01 September 2025).

[26] Wetselaar P, Wetselaar-Glas MJM, Katzer LD, Ahlers MO. Diagnosing tooth wear, a new taxonomy based on the revised version of the Tooth Wear Evaluation System (TWES 2.0). Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2020; 47: 703–712.

[27] Grossi ML, Filho RT. Letter to the editor regarding the Bruxism Screener questionnaire (BruxScreen). Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2024; 51: 2237–2238.

[28] Ozdemir H, Alper Z, Uncu Y, Bilgel N. Health literacy among adults: a study from Turkey. Health Education Research. 2010; 25: 464–477.

[29] Donnarumma V, Ohrbach R, Simeon V, Lobbezoo F, Piscicelli N, Michelotti A. Association between waking-state oral behaviours, according to the oral behaviors checklist, and TMD subgroups. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2021; 48: 996–1003.

[30] Omezli MM, Torul D, Varer Akpinar C. Temporomandibular disorder severity and its association with psychosocial and sociodemographic factors in Turkish adults. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23: 34.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top