Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Quantitative pupillometry as a marker of autonomic dysregulation in vestibular migraine
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, 06170 Ankara, Türkiye
2Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, 06170 Ankara, Türkiye
3Department of Neurology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, 06170 Ankara, Türkiye
4Department of Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ege University, 35100 Izmir, Türkiye
DOI: 10.22514/jofph.2026.053 Vol.40,Issue 4,July 2026 pp.110-119
Submitted: 01 December 2025 Accepted: 24 March 2026
Published: 12 July 2026
*Corresponding Author(s): Gulce Kirazli E-mail: gulce.kirazli@ege.edu.tr
Background: Vestibular migraine (VM) has been associated with altered central sensory processing; however, objective measures of autonomic involvement remain insufficiently characterized. Quantitative pupillometry enables standardized assessment of both static and dynamic pupil responses. This study compared pupillary parameters between patients with VM and healthy controls under controlled illumination conditions. Methods: Seventy participants were enrolled, including 40 patients diagnosed with VM according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) criteria, and 30 age- and sex-matched controls. Bilateral pupillometry was performed using an automated infrared system under scotopic, mesopic, low photopic, high photopic, and resting light conditions. Static pupil diameter and dynamic parameters (including constriction amplitude, latency, duration, velocity, and dilation metrics) were recorded. Between-group comparisons were conducted using parametric or nonparametric tests, as appropriate based on the data distribution. Results: No significant differences were observed between groups in mean pupil diameter across illumination conditions (all p > 0.05). Dynamic pupillary parameters also did not differ significantly between the study groups. However, both groups demonstrated mild right-to-left asymmetry in static measurements, with a statistically significant interocular difference observed in the VM group under high-photopic conditions (p = 0.001). Dynamic asymmetries were minimal and not clinically meaningful. Conclusions: Interictal static and dynamic pupillary parameters did not differ significantly between patients with VM and healthy controls. Although minor light-dependent asymmetries were observed, their clinical significance remains uncertain. Further studies incorporating longitudinal designs and multimodal autonomic assessments are warranted to clarify the relationship between autonomic function and VM.
Vestibular migraine; Quantitative pupillometry; Autonomic function; Pupillary light reflex
Gokce Saygi Uysal,Zulkuf Kucuktag,Aykut Ozdogan,Mevlut Yilmaz,Tuba Kuz Teksut,Gulce Kirazli. Quantitative pupillometry as a marker of autonomic dysregulation in vestibular migraine. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2026. 40(4);110-119.
[1] Ashina M. Migraine. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020; 383: 1866–1876.
[2] GBD 2016 Headache Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Neurology. 2018; 17: 954–976.
[3] Amiri P, Kazeminasab S, Nejadghaderi SA, Mohammadinasab R, Pourfathi H, Araj-Khodaei M, et al. Migraine: a review on its history, global epidemiology, risk factors, and comorbidities. Frontiers in Neurology. 2022; 12: 800605.
[4] Formeister EJ, Rizk HG, Kohn MA, Sharon JD. The epidemiology of vestibular migraine: a population-based survey study. Otology & Neurotology. 2018; 39: 1037–1044.
[5] Lempert T, Olesen J, Furman J, Waterston J, Seemungal B, Carey J, et al. Vestibular migraine: diagnostic criteria. Journal of Vestibular Research. 2012; 22: 167–172.
[6] Andreou AP, Edvinsson L. Mechanisms of migraine as a chronic evolutive condition. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 2019; 20: 117.
[7] Molaee Z, Smith RA, Maksemous N, Griffiths LR. Genetic insights into hemiplegic migraine: whole exome sequencing highlights vascular pathway involvement via association analysis. Genes. 2025; 16: 895.
[8] Sutherland HG, Albury CL, Griffiths LR. Advances in genetics of migraine. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 2019; 20: 72.
[9] Rogawski MA. Common pathophysiologic mechanisms in migraine and epilepsy. Archives of Neurology. 2008; 65: 709–714.
[10] Mantegazza M, Cestèle S. Pathophysiological mechanisms of migraine and epilepsy: similarities and differences. Neuroscience Letters. 2018; 667: 92–102.
[11] Grangeon L, Lange KS, Waliszewska-Prosół M, Onan D, Marschollek K, Wiels W, et al.; European Headache Federation School of Advanced Studies (EHF-SAS). Genetics of migraine: where are we now? The Journal of Headache and Pain. 2023; 24: 12.
[12] Neumann N, Fullana MA, Radua J, Brandt T, Dieterich M, Lotze M. Common neural correlates of vestibular stimulation and fear learning: an fMRI meta-analysis. Journal of Neurology. 2023; 270: 1843–1856.
[13] Bouisset N, Phylactou P, Duport A. The vestibular system in pain and embodiment: cortical overlap, modulatory potential, and therapeutic perspectives. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2025; 19: 1661515.
[14] Iyengar S, Johnson KW, Ossipov MH, Aurora SK. CGRP and the trigeminal system in migraine. Headache. 2019; 59: 659–681.
[15] Rogawski MA, Löscher W. The neurobiology of antiepileptic drugs. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2004; 5: 553–564.
[16] Silberstein SD. Topiramate in migraine prevention: a 2016 perspective. Headache. 2017; 57: 165–178.
[17] Charles A. The pathophysiology of migraine: implications for clinical management. The Lancet Neurology. 2018; 17: 174–182.
[18] Pietrobon D, Moskowitz MA. Pathophysiology of migraine. Annual Review of Physiology. 2013; 75: 365–391.
[19] Villar-Martinez MD, Goadsby PJ. Vestibular migraine: an update. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2024; 37: 252–263.
[20] Yamanaka G, Hayashi K, Morishita N, Takeshita M, Ishii C, Suzuki S, et al. Experimental and clinical investigation of cytokines in migraine: a narrative review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24: 8343.
[21] Perini F, D’Andrea G, Galloni E, Pignatelli F, Billo G, Alba S, et al. Plasma cytokine levels in migraineurs and controls. Headache. 2005; 45: 926–931.
[22] Edvinsson L. The trigeminovascular pathway: role of CGRP and CGRP receptors in migraine. Headache. 2017; 57: 47–55.
[23] Edvinsson L, Warfvinge K. Recognizing the role of CGRP and CGRP receptors in migraine and its treatment. Cephalalgia. 2019; 39: 366–373.
[24] Couper KN, Blount DG, Riley EM. IL-10: the master regulator of immunity to infection. Journal of Immunology. 2008; 180: 5771–5777.
[25] Li Y, Wang Y, Chen M, Jiang R, Ju Y. Eye movement abnormalities during different periods in patients with vestibular migraine. Journal of Pain Research. 2023; 16: 3583–3590.
[26] Wei HL, Zhou X, Chen YC, Yu YS, Guo X, Zhou GP, et al. Impaired intrinsic functional connectivity between the thalamus and visual cortex in migraine without aura. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 2019; 20: 116.
[27] Chen Z, Liu Y, Lin C, Li Z, Shan J, Duan Z, et al. Aberrant cerebral blood flow and functional connectivity in patients with vestibular migraine: a resting-state ASL and fMRI study. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 2024; 25: 84.
[28] Mathôt S. Pupillometry: psychology, physiology, and function. Journal of Cognition. 2018; 1: 16.
[29] Messina R, Rocca MA, Goadsby PJ, Filippi M. Insights into migraine attacks from neuroimaging. The Lancet Neurology. 2023; 22: 834–846.
[30] Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 6th edn. Pearson: Boston, MA, USA. 2013.
[31] Zieliński G. Getting to know pain effect sizes-guidelines for effect size and sample size in global pain research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2026; 107: 726–733.
[32] Miglis MG. Migraine and autonomic dysfunction: which is the horse and which is the jockey? Current Pain and Headache Reports. 2018; 22: 19.
[33] Gazerani P, Cairns BE. Dysautonomia in the pathogenesis of migraine. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2018; 18: 153–165.
[34] McGee S. Evidence-based physical diagnosis. 3rd edn. Elsevier: Philadelphia. 2012.
[35] Joshi S, Gold JI. Pupil size as a window on neural substrates of cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2020; 24: 466–480.
[36] Zou X, He J, Zhou M, Zhao F, Tian X, Xu X, et al. Photophobia and visual triggers in vestibular migraine. Neurology and Therapy. 2024; 13: 1191–1201.
[37] Qubty W, Patniyot I. Migraine pathophysiology. Pediatric Neurology. 2020; 107: 1–6.
[38] Kavuncu SK, Nalçacıoğlu P, Güneş NH, Özkoyuncu D, Kara C. A shift of the pupillary balance towards the parasymphathetic system in migraine patients with aura. Archives of Neuropsychiatry. 2022; 59: 268–273.
[39] Harle DE, Wolffsohn JS, Evans BJ. The pupillary light reflex in migraine. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2005; 25: 240–245.
[40] Yang Y, Xu H, Deng Z, Cheng W, Zhao X, Wu Y, et al. Functional connectivity and structural changes of thalamic subregions in episodic migraine. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 2022; 23: 119.
[41] Ceriani CEJ. Vestibular migraine pathophysiology and treatment: a narrative review. Current Pain and Headache Reports. 2024; 28: 47–54.
[42] Halberstadt AL, Balaban CD. Anterograde tracing of projections from the dorsal raphe nucleus to the vestibular nuclei. Neuroscience. 2006; 143: 641–654.
[43] King S, Priesol AJ, Davidi SE, Merfeld DM, Ehtemam F, Lewis RF. Self-motion perception is sensitized in vestibular migraine: pathophysiologic and clinical implications. Scientific Reports. 2019; 9: 14323.
[44] Kirsch V, Keeser D, Hergenroeder T, Erat O, Ertl-Wagner B, Brandt T, et al. Structural and functional connectivity mapping of the vestibular circuitry from human brainstem to cortex. Brain Structure and Function. 2016; 221: 1291–1308.
[45] Noseda R, Jakubowski M, Kainz V, Borsook D, Burstein R. Cortical projections of functionally identified thalamic trigeminovascular neurons: implications for migraine headache and its associated symptoms. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2011; 31: 14204–14217.
[46] Filippov IV, Williams WC, Frolov VA. Very slow potential oscillations in locus coeruleus and dorsal raphe nucleus under different illumination in freely moving rats. Neuroscience Letters. 2004; 363: 89–93.
[47] Devilbiss DM, Page ME, Waterhouse BD. Locus ceruleus regulates sensory encoding by neurons and networks in waking animals. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2006; 26: 9860–9872.
[48] Bednarczuk NF, Bonsu A, Ortega MC, Fluri AS, Chan J, Rust H, et al. Abnormal visuo-vestibular interactions in vestibular migraine: a cross sectional study. Brain. 2019; 142: 606–616.
[49] Wurthmann S, Naegel S, Roesner M, Nsaka M, Scheffler A, Kleinschnitz C, et al. Sensitized rotatory motion perception and increased susceptibility to motion sickness in vestibular migraine: a cross-sectional study. European Journal of Neurology. 2021; 28: 2357–2366.
[50] Gufoni M, Casani AP. “The pupillary (hippus) nystagmus”: a possible clinical hallmark to support the diagnosis of vestibular migraine. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12: 1957.
Top