Article Data

  • Views 151
  • Dowloads 49

Original Research

Open Access

Association between malocclusion and temporomandibular joint disorders: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study

  • Zhouqiang Wu1,2,†
  • Sen Wang1,†
  • Chang Liu1
  • Zhiyi Zhao1
  • Yan Feng1
  • Yue Shan1
  • Wen Li1,*,
  • Mengjie Wu1,*,

1Department of Orthodontics, Stomatology Hospital, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine & Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases of Zhejiang Province & Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Research of Zhejiang Province & Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, 310006 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

2Department of Orthodontics, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, 610000 Chengdu, Sichuan, China

DOI: 10.22514/jofph.2026.062 Vol.40,Issue 5,September 2026 pp.74-82

Submitted: 09 April 2026 Accepted: 15 June 2026

Published: 12 September 2026

*Corresponding Author(s): Wen Li E-mail: ewen74@zju.edu.cn
*Corresponding Author(s): Mengjie Wu E-mail: wumengjie@zju.edu.cn

† These authors contributed equally.

PDF (11.49 MB) View Full-text

Abstract

Background: Although malocclusion and temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) frequently co-occur in clinical practice, controversy persists regarding whether this overlap reflects a pathophysiological causal relationship or incidental concurrence. This study aimed to investigate the potential association between malocclusion and TMD using a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. Methods: Bidirectional two-sample MR was performed to evaluate the potential causal relationship between malocclusion and TMD. Summary statistics for malocclusion were obtained from the FinnGen consortium, while TMD datasets were obtained from the FinnGen consortium and an independent genome-wide association study (GWAS) of the UK Biobank (UKB). To account for multiple comparisons, a Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold of 0.00625 was applied. The strength of the instrumental variables (IVs) was assessed using F-statistics. Causal inference was conducted using multiple MR methods, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), maximum likelihood estimation, MR-Egger regression, weighted median (WM), and penalized weighted median analyses. Sensitivity analyses were performed using Cochran’s Q test for heterogeneity, MR-Egger intercept analysis, Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier (MR-PRESSO) global outlier assessment, and iterative leave-one-out validation. Results: Convergent evidence from IVW, WM, and penalized weighted median estimators suggested potential causal effects of distal bite, deep bite, and open bite on TMD susceptibility. After Bonferroni correction, deep bite remained significantly associated with TMD. The mean F-statistics for the IVs ranged from 22.23 to 23.62 across malocclusion types, indicating adequate instrument strength. Reverse MR analysis using 130 TMD-related Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) showed no evidence supporting a causal effect of TMD on malocclusion. Conclusions: This MR study provides evidence that several malocclusion types, including distal bite, deep bite, and open bite, are potentially causally associated with TMD, with deep bite showing the strongest association.

Keywords

Malocclusion; Temporomandibular joint disorders; Mendelian randomization

Cite and Share

Zhouqiang Wu, Sen Wang, Chang Liu, Zhiyi Zhao, Yan Feng, Yue Shan, Wen Li, Mengjie Wu. Association between malocclusion and temporomandibular joint disorders: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2026; 40(5): 74-82. doi: 10.22514/jofph.2026.062

References

[1] Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP, et al.; International RDC/TMD Consortium Network, International Association for Dental Research; Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group, International Association for the Study of Pain. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2014; 28: 6–27.

[2] Valesan LF, Da-Cas CD, Réus JC, Denardin ACS, Garanhani RR, Bonotto D, et al. Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2021; 25: 441–453.

[3] Warzocha J, Gadomska-Krasny J, Mrowiec J. Etiologic factors of temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of literature containing diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) and research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD) from 2018 to 2022. Healthcare. 2024; 12: 575.

[4] Tervahauta E, Närhi L, Pirttiniemi P, Sipilä K, Näpänkangas R, Tolvanen M, et al. Prevalence of sagittal molar and canine relationships, asymmetries and midline shift in relation to temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in a Finnish adult population. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2022; 80: 470–480.

[5] Ispir NG, Toraman M. The relationship of masseter muscle thickness with face morphology and parafunctional habits: an ultrasound study. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2022; 51: 20220166.

[6] Almaqrami BS, Alhammadi MS, Tang B, Alyafrusee ES, Hua F, He H. Three‑dimensional morphological and positional analysis of the temporomandibular joint in adults with posterior crossbite: a cross‑sectional comparative study. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2021; 48: 666–677.

[7] Gomes SG, Custodio W, Faot F, Cury AA, Garcia RC. Chewing side, bite force symmetry, and occlusal contact area of subjects with different facial vertical patterns. Brazilian Oral Research. 2011; 25: 446–452.

[8] Farré-Guasch E, Aliberas JT, Spada NF, de Vries R, Schulten EAJM, Lobbezoo F. The role of inflammatory markers in temporomandibular myalgia: a systematic review. The Japanese Dental Science Review. 2023; 59: 281–288.

[9] Sfondrini MF, Bolognesi L, Bosco M, Gandini P, Scribante A. Skeletal divergence and condylar asymmetry in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD): a retrospective study. BioMed Research International. 2021; 2021: 8042910.

[10] Cifter ED. Effects of occlusal plane inclination on the temporomandibular joint stress distribution: a three dimensional finite element analysis. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2022; 2022: 2171049.

[11] Almpani K, Tran H, Ferri A, Hung M. Assessment of condylar anatomy and degenerative changes in temporomandibular joint disorders—a scoping review. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2023; 13: 764–780.

[12] Jiang L, Zheng Z, Fang H, Yang J. A generalized linear mixed model association tool for biobank-scale data. Nature Genetics. 2021; 53: 1616–1621.

[13] Burgess S, Davey Smith G, Davies NM, Dudbridge F, Gill D, Glymour MM, et al. Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations: update for summer 2023. Wellcome Open Research. 2023; 4: 186.

[14] Sanderson E, Glymour MM, Holmes MV, Kang H, Morrison J, Munafò MR, et al. Mendelian randomization. Nature Reviews Methods Primers. 2022; 2: 6.

[15] Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2015; 44: 512–525.

[16] Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock PC, Burgess S. Consistent estimation in Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genetic Epidemiology. 2016; 40: 304–314.

[17] Verbanck M, Chen CY, Neale B, Do R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nature Genetics. 2018; 50: 693–698.

[18] Sonnesen L, Bakke M, Solow B. Malocclusion traits and symptoms and signs of temporomandibular disorders in children with severe malocclusion. European Journal of Orthodontics. 1998; 20: 543–559.

[19] Jiang Y, Wang Y, Wang T, Liu D, Lin C, Wang J, et al. Orthodontic camouflage treatment of a hyperdivergent adolescent patient with anterior open bite and TMD: a case report. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 629.

[20] de Paiva Bertoli FM, Bruzamolin CD, de Almeida Kranz GO, Losso EM, Brancher JA, de Souza JF. Anxiety and malocclusion are associated with temporomandibular disorders in adolescents diagnosed by RDC/TMD. A cross-sectional study. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2018; 45: 747–755.

[21] Da-Cas CD, Valesan LF, Nascimento LPD, Denardin ACS, Januzzi E, Fernandes G, et al. Risk factors for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of cohort studies. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2024; 138: 502–515.

[22] Hysa E, Lercara A, Cere A, Gotelli E, Gerli V, Paolino S, et al. Temporomandibular disorders in immune-mediated rheumatic diseases of the adult: a systematic review. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2023; 61: 152215.

[23] Felsenthal N, Zelzer E. Mechanical regulation of musculoskeletal system development. Development. 2017; 144: 4271–4283.

[24] Xiao M, Ni S. Different effects of abnormal mechanical stress on temporomandibular joint cartilage, subchondral bone, and discs. Frontiers in Physiology. 2025; 16: 1539342.

[25] Wu M, Wu S, Chen W, Li YP. The roles and regulatory mechanisms of TGF-β and BMP signaling in bone and cartilage development, homeostasis and disease. Cell Research. 2024; 34: 101–123.

[26] Tabeian H, Betti BF, Dos Santos Cirqueira C, de Vries TJ, Lobbezoo F, Ter Linde AV, et al. IL-1β damages fibrocartilage and upregulates MMP-13 expression in fibrochondrocytes in the condyle of the temporomandibular joint. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20: 2260.

JOFPH Volume 40 Issue 5 cover
Current Issue

Vol.40, Issue 5, 12 September 2026

Table of contents
All Issues

Submission Turnaround Time

Top