Functional stabilization and neuromuscular adaptation in active condylar hyperplasia: a comparative cohort study

Background: Active unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) is a progressive mandibular growth disorder characterized by facial asymmetry, occlusal alteration, and mandibular deviation. Although single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomog-raphy (SPECT/CT) is widely used to assess condylar hyperactivity, little is known about the clinical and neuromuscular adaptations occurring during the observation period before definitive treatment. This study evaluated whether conservative functional stabilization is associated with adaptive clinical and neuromuscular changes during this period. Methods: This prospective comparative observational cohort study included 49 patients with active unilateral condylar hyperplasia confirmed by SPECT/CT. Thirty-seven patients received full-time orthopedic stabilization with a rigid mandibular intraoral orthosis, whereas 12 were managed by observation alone. Clinical outcomes included pain intensity, maximum mouth opening, and mandibular midline deviation. Surface electromyography (sEMG) was performed at baseline and after approximately 3 months. SPECT/CT examinations were obtained at baseline and follow-up (mean, approximately 14 months). Within-group and between-group comparisons, effect sizes, percentage changes, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: Orthopedic stabilization significantly improved mandibular midline deviation, maximum mouth opening, and neuromuscular function. Composite resting sEMG activity decreased, whereas functional muscle recruitment increased in the treated cohort. In contrast, the observation cohort demonstrated increased resting muscle activity with minimal functional changes. Significant between-group differences were observed for resting and functional sEMG outcomes. SPECT/CT metabolic changes were also detected, but were less consistent and clinically informative than the documented clinical and neuromuscular adaptations. Conclusions: Full-time orthopedic stabilization was associated with measurable clinical and neuromuscular adaptation during the observation period preceding definitive treatment. These findings support functional stabilization as a conservative approach that may promote a more favorable neuromuscular and biomechanical environment while treatment decisions are being made. SPECT/CT findings should be interpreted as complementary semiquantitative observations rather than definitive indicators of growth modification.

Unilateral condylar hyperplasia; SPECT/CT; Surface electromyography; Orthopedic stabilization; Temporomandibular joint; Mandibular asymmetry

[1] Obwegeser HL, Makek MS. Hemimandibular hyperplasia—hemimandibular elongation. Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery. 1986; 14: 183–208.

[2] Wolford LM, Movahed R, Perez DE. A classification system for conditions causing condylar hyperplasia. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014; 72: 567–595.

[3] Gateno J, Coppelson KB, Kuang T, Poliak CD, Xia JJ. A better understanding of unilateral condylar hyperplasia of the mandible. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2021; 79: 1122–1132.

[4] Ergezen E, Salyut A, Akdeniz SS, Çubuk S. Characterizing the unseen: clinical and radiographic perspectives on unilateral condylar hyperplasia. Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2025; 126: 102129.

[5] Beltran J, Zaror C, Moya MP, Netto HD, Olate S. Diagnosis and treatment in unilateral condylar hyperplasia. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12: 1017.

[6] Pravallika A, Menon CS, Sham ME, Archana S, Mathews S. Condylar hyperplasia: case report and literature review. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2023; 22: 916–926.

[7] Karssemakers LHE, Nolte JW, Rehmann C, Raijmakers PG, Becking AG. Diagnostic performance of SPECT-CT imaging in unilateral condylar hyperplasia. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2023; 52: 199–204.

[8] Karssemakers LHE, Besseling LMP, Schoonmade LJ, Su N, Nolte JW, Raijmakers PG, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of bone SPECT and SPECT/CT imaging in the diagnosis of unilateral condylar hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2024; 52: 447–453.

[9] De Schepper S, Gnanasegaran G, De Vos W, Van de Casteele E, Dickson JC, Van den Wyngaert T. From SPECT/CT towards absolute quantification?—the case of unilateral condylar hyperplasia of the mandible. EJNMMI Physics. 2024; 11: 74.

[10] Anzola LK, Venegas N, Jaramillo MC, Moreno S, Hinojosa M, Amador E, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of bone SPECT techniques in differentiating unilateral and bilateral condylar hyperplasia. Diagnostics. 2024; 14: 2548.

[11] Ghawsi S, Aagaard E, Thygesen TH. High condylectomy for the treatment of mandibular condylar hyperplasia: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2016; 45: 60–71.

[12] Riechmann M, Gellrich NC, Kress B, Schmidt C, Schröder C, Neff A. Clinical practice guideline: condylar hyperplasia of the mandible—diagnosis and treatment. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2024; 121: 816–823.

[13] Bi R, Abotaleb BM, Bai X, Cao K, Chen G, Cheng J, et al. Expert consensus on treatment of condylar hyperplasia and secondary dento-maxillofacial deformities. International Journal of Oral Science. 2026; 18: 45.

[14] Busse JW, Casassus R, Carrasco-Labra A, Durham J, Mock D, Zakrzewska JM, et al. Management of chronic pain associated with temporomandibular disorders: a clinical practice guideline. The BMJ. 2023; 383: e076227.

[15] Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP, et al.; International RDC/TMD Consortium Network, International Association for Dental Research; Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group, International Association for the Study of Pain. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group^†. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2014; 28: 6–27.

[16] Orzeszek S, Waliszewska-Prosol M, Ettlin D, Seweryn P, Straburzynski M, Martelletti P, et al. Efficiency of occlusal splint therapy on orofacial muscle pain reduction: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23: 180.

[17] Zhang Y, Zhang H, Liu R, Jin S, Huo T, Wei H, et al. The efficacy of treatments for temporomandibular disorders with occlusal splints versus other conservative therapies: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2025; 139: 509–520.

[18] Singh BP, Singh N, Jayaraman S, Kirubakaran R, Joseph S, Muthu MS, et al. Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2024; 9: CD012850.

[19] Kelemen K, König J, Czumbel M, Szabó B, Hegyi P, Gerber G, et al. Additional splint therapy has no superiority in myogenic temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2024; 68: 12–19.

[20] Musa M, Awad R, Izeldin S, Zhao Y, Wu H, Wang L, et al. Quantitative and qualitative condylar changes following stabilization splint therapy in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders with and without skeletal lateral mandibular asymmetry: a cone beam computed tomographic study. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 363.

[21] von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLOS Medicine. 2007; 4: e296.

[22] Gay T, Rendell J, Majoureau A, Maloney FT. Estimating human incisal bite forces from the electromyogram/bite-force function. Archives of Oral Biology. 1994; 39: 111–115.

[23] Dorosz T, Mańko A, Ginszt M. Use of surface electromyography to evaluate effects of therapeutic methods on masticatory muscle activity in patients with temporomandibular disorders: a narrative review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13: 920.

[24] Chan BH, Leung YY. SPECT bone scintigraphy for the assessment of condylar growth activity in mandibular asymmetry: is it accurate? International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2018; 47: 470–479.

[25] Cisneros GJ, Kaban LB. Computerized skeletal scintigraphy for assessment of mandibular asymmetry. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1984; 42: 513–520.

[26] Henderson MJ, Wastie ML, Bromige M, Selwyn P, Smith A. Technetium-99m bone scintigraphy and mandibular condylar hyperplasia. Clinical Radiology. 1990; 41: 411–414.

[27] Gray RJ, Horner K, Testa HJ, Lloyd JJ, Sloan P. Condylar hyperplasia: correlation of histological and scintigraphic features. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 1994; 23: 103–107.

[28] Ahmed MMS, Shi D, Al-Somairi MAA, Alhashimi N, Almashraqi AA, Musa M, et al. Three dimensional evaluation of the skeletal and temporomandibular joint changes following stabilization splint therapy in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders and mandibular deviation: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23: 18.

[29] Higginson JA, Bartram AC, Banks RJ, Keith DJW. Condylar hyperplasia: current thinking. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. 2018; 56: 655–662.

[30] Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Colombo A, Ciusa V. An electromyographic investigation of masticatory muscles symmetry in normo-occlusion subjects. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2000; 27: 33–40.

[31] Ferrario VF, Sforza C. Coordinated electromyographic activity of the human masseter and temporalis anterior muscles during mastication. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 1996; 104: 511–517.

[32] Ferrario VF, Tartaglia GM, Maglione M, Simion M, Sforza C. Neuromuscular coordination of masticatory muscles in subjects with two types of implant-supported prostheses. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2004; 15: 219–225.

[33] Sforza C, Tartaglia GM, Solimene U, Morgun V, Kaspranskiy RR, Ferrario VF. Occlusion, sternocleidomastoid muscle activity, and body sway: a pilot study in male astronauts. CRANIO®. 2006; 24: 43–49.

[34] Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A III, D’Addona A, Barbini E. Electromyographic activity of human masticatory muscles in normal young people. Statistical evaluation of reference values for clinical applications. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1993; 20: 271–280.

[35] Castroflorio T, Bracco P, Farina D. Surface electromyography in the assessment of jaw elevator muscles. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2008; 35: 638–645.

[36] Castroflorio T, Farina D, Bottin A, Piancino MG, Bracco P, Merletti R. Surface EMG of jaw elevator muscles: effect of electrode location and inter-electrode distance. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2005; 32: 411–417.

[37] Zieliński G, Gawda P. Surface electromyography in dentistry—past, present and future. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13: 1328.

[38] Sivakanthan T, Steinbacher DM. Bilateral TMJ changes secondary to unilateral condylar hyperplasia. FACE. 2025; 6: 70–73.

[39] López DF, Botero JR, Muñoz JM, Cardenas-Perilla RA. Mandibular and temporomandibular morphologic characteristics of patients with suspected unilateral condylar hyperplasia: a CT study. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2020; 25: 61–68.

[40] Sun R, Sun L, Sun Z, Li G, Zhao Y, Ma X, et al. A three-dimensional study of hemimandibular hyperplasia, hemimandibular elongation, solitary condylar hyperplasia, simple mandibular asymmetry and condylar osteoma or osteochondroma. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019; 47: 1665–1675.